Jump to content

Mark Reynolds just put the umpires on blast. More to come


Greg

Recommended Posts

iWFP8ZKa4w0u8.gif

Even though his K's can be frustrating, I love Mark. Always gives 100% effort, always cheering on his teammates, and you can tell he wants to win really badly. That's part of the reason I want him to turn it around so badly, because you can tell he really wants to help the team make the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Even though his K's can be frustrating, I love Mark. Always gives 100% effort, always cheering on his teammates, and you can tell he wants to win really badly. That's part of the reason I want him to turn it around so badly, because you can tell he really wants to help the team make the playoffs.
Gotta agree. Everyone has been hard on Reynolds this season, but for me at least, I've felt kind of bad when ripping him. He obviously cares a LOT about playing well and more importantly, winning.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though his K's can be frustrating, I love Mark. Always gives 100% effort, always cheering on his teammates, and you can tell he wants to win really badly. That's part of the reason I want him to turn it around so badly, because you can tell he really wants to help the team make the playoffs.

Dang straight. I love seeing this from Mark. Everyone on the board obviously loves this team to death, seeing that reciprocated makes me a fan of Reynolds.

LOVE those post-game comments. My thoughts and sentiments to a 'T'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we know Mark is going to be lighter in the wallet after that. Does this crew expand the strike zone on him for the rest of the series?

I don't know, Corn. I wouldn't necessarily assume so, and I'll tell you why. The umpires look really bad here, overturning a call that they had right in the first place. What's more, I have to think that on some level, Bud Selig and company will be embarrassed at having to fine Reynolds for his outburst, knowing that he was right, and knowing that the umpires look like buffoons. If the umps "go after" Reynolds in the next 2 games, it could make an already embarrassing situation for both the umpires and Selig even worse. If I were Selig, I wouldn't want any part of that potential mockery in the next 2 games. I wouldn't be surprised if he has a brief chat with the umps tonight or tomorrow, and reminds them that they are professionals, and that he doesn't want to see them making an already bad situation even worse by targeting Reynolds.

We'll see what happens.

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, Corn. I wouldn't necessarily assume so, and I'll tell you why. The umpires look really bad here, overturning a call that they had right in the first place. What's more, I have to think that on some level, Bud Selig and company will be embarrassed at having to fine Reynolds for his outburst, knowing that he was right, and knowing that the umpires look like buffoons. If the umps "go after" Reynolds in the next 2 games, it could make an already embarrassing situation for both the umpires and Selig even worse. If I were Selig, I wouldn't want any part of that potential mockery in the next 2 games. I wouldn't be surprised if he has a brief chat with the umps tonight or tomorrow, and reminds them that they are professionals, and that he doesn't want to see them making an already bad situation even worse by targeting Reynolds.

We'll see what happens.

.

Yup. It's the smart thing for MLB to do. If they fine Reynolds or anyone else, then the issue won't die and it lingers in the headlines. If they just let it go, it'll die and in a week everyone will forget about it. But, that's if they're smart they'll let this thing die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Selig sucks. Period. The guy is stuck in the stone age. And his lackey Joe Torre isn't helping the sport either. This sport NEEDS instant replay. Game of inches. Get the right calls. Period.

The umpires should only really be there to speed the game along. Instant replay will be there to keep them in line. The umpires union is screwing this sport to high hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Win or lose this team has my heart.. My respect level for Mark Reynolds is at a all time high, the guy wants to win, just like all of us on this board. It's hard enough to beat the tigers let alone with the umps even against us. I just wish we could make playoffs and shove right in the rest of the worlds face, cause right now fellas it looks like its us(orioles) against the rest of the league.. We will overcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...