Jump to content

Some O's tidbits from Keith Law's chat yesterday


ChaosLex

Recommended Posts

Is Chris Tillman a # 4 pitcher at this point? Looked to have turned the corner finally...How do you view him?

I think he'll be more than that with a full 2013 season.

Jason Hammel -- I believe he has a year left of club control. Would a two or three year deal be something that Hammel and the O's should look into? Or revisit it at some point next year?

Depends on his knee. Would certainly extend him a year or two if that checks out.

How did Schoop look to you in the AFL?

Good. I'm a big fan. Don't think he's a SS long term but I think he'll hit and have easy power.

You have mentioned several times (here and on Twitter) that the Orioles need to make some major roster moves to have a chance to contend in 2013. I agree and, other than SP, 1B, 2B & LF, what would you address? Thanks.

I'd try to use Hardy to fill one or more of those holes, sliding Machado to his natural position at short. I'd also want to move Jones to left and get a better defender in center. I wouldn't spend a dime on the bullpen.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Agree with everything he said except for the last part. I think that moving Jones to LF, I'm guessing for us to get Bourn, and then trading Hardy (who is one of our best players) to try to fill other holes makes us worse.

Agree with Tillman and Hammel though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the GG was a joke, AJ can stay in center. I'm very high on Tillman and Schoop. Hammel needs to give us a full year before I'd decide anything.

I like the idea of moving Hardy. A lot of folks get butt hurt when that gets mentioned but we have to upgrade the offense somewhere. If a good 3B bat can be acquired in trade (I said if) then I'd move Manny to SS. We don't have to... nothing against JJ... but it's a possibility. If Mark comes back, and we know several other players aren't going anywhere, it doesn't leave too many places to add a bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally have no desire to tamper with the left side of our infield. Hardy has been a 7 WAR player over his two years here (3.5 WAR/yr), and Machado played at a 4.5 WAR/yr pace as a green rookie who had just turned 20 years old. The left side of the infield was virtually impregnable for the last two months, unlike anything I've seen since Brooks and Belanger were at their stations. I'm not changing anything about that. The fact that Hardy had a down year offensively and that Machado will one day be our SS doesn't change my opinion one iota.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the GG was a joke, AJ can stay in center. I'm very high on Tillman and Schoop. Hammel needs to give us a full year before I'd decide anything.

I like the idea of moving Hardy. A lot of folks get butt hurt when that gets mentioned but we have to upgrade the offense somewhere. If a good 3B bat can be acquired in trade (I said if) then I'd move Manny to SS. We don't have to... nothing against JJ... but it's a possibility. If Mark comes back, and we know several other players aren't going anywhere, it doesn't leave too many places to add a bat.

I wouldn't object to moving Hammel. Send him, Arrieta, and Strop somewhere so we can get the big bat we need. I don't know what we could get for that, or what's available though. I'm not expecting Pujols.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with moving Hardy to fill holes is that it creates a huge one at 3B, which is possibly the hardest one to fill in MLB.

Yup. You don't move Hardy until Schoop is ready. As much as I hate Hardy's low-OBP offensive skill set, I don't think it's a significant problem if he moves down in the order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the GG was a joke, AJ can stay in center. I'm very high on Tillman and Schoop. Hammel needs to give us a full year before I'd decide anything.

I like the idea of moving Hardy. A lot of folks get butt hurt when that gets mentioned but we have to upgrade the offense somewhere. If a good 3B bat can be acquired in trade (I said if) then I'd move Manny to SS. We don't have to... nothing against JJ... but it's a possibility. If Mark comes back, and we know several other players aren't going anywhere, it doesn't leave too many places to add a bat.

Who is the 3B that you want to acquire that makes our left side better with Manny at short then it is now with Manny and JJ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with everything he said except for the last part. I think that moving Jones to LF, I'm guessing for us to get Bourn, and then trading Hardy (who is one of our best players) to try to fill other holes makes us worse.

Agree with Tillman and Hammel though.

Hardy's one of our best defenders (second best behind Wieters, although if Reynolds and Machado could keep up their defense from the final 6 weeks or so for a whole season, they would be up there). Hardy is also one of our worst hitters. I don't think he's one of our best players, although it depends on your definition. Either way, the return for him would determine whether or not trading him would make us worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hardy's one of our best defenders (second best behind Wieters, although if Reynolds and Machado could keep up their defense from the final 6 weeks or so for a whole season, they would be up there). Hardy is also one of our worst hitters. I don't think he's one of our best players, although it depends on your definition. Either way, the return for him would determine whether or not trading him would make us worse.

His value to the Orioles is one of the highest on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally have no desire to tamper with the left side of our infield. Hardy has been a 7 WAR player over his two years here (3.5 WAR/yr), and Machado played at a 4.5 WAR/yr pace as a green rookie who had just turned 20 years old. The left side of the infield was virtually impregnable for the last two months, unlike anything I've seen since Brooks and Belanger were at their stations. I'm not changing anything about that. The fact that Hardy had a down year offensively and that Machado will one day be our SS doesn't change my opinion one iota.

I think it's very difficult for a GM to blow up something that worked well enough to propel a bad team to the playoffs. Or at least be a major cog in propelling a formerly bad team into the playoffs. Hardy does have some surplus value that could be turned into some nice assets, but I have a hard time seeing that happen. There's value in keeping Hardy and using the money you're saving there (paying $7M for $15M+ in value) to improve in other areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is the 3B that you want to acquire that makes our left side better with Manny at short then it is now with Manny and JJ?

Here's the criteria:

1) JJ is 30, so the team would have to be fairly close to competing now

2) They'd have to have a fairly large hole at short

3) They need to match up with a hole on the Oriole roster

Who is that? Boston? Detroit, maybe? Arizona? I don't know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • How can you not be romantic about baseball? This seems slightly poetic. I enjoyed reading, and correlated your experience in the stands back to what I watch in Game 1 on MASN.  It was also pretty cool to hear Jim Palmer give you a shout out in Game 2 of the series on Live TV.
    • I am not worried.  It just doesn’t remotely meet the eye test.  He has been great in the field . I can think of at least 3 outstanding plays he has made and not any that I thought he should have gotten but didn’t. Meanwhile Holliday is 3 OAA and I can’t think of an outstanding play and can think of a number I thought he should have made. 
    • Nicely stated Roy. Every since I was 9 years old and saw the O's vs. the Tokyo Giants in Tokyo in 1971, I've been infected with the Orange/Black virus. There is no cure and I don't want one. You and I sat at the lunch table with Jim Palmer at the 1970 World Series Champs reunion, and its still one of my enduring baseball memories. You said I looked like Carlton Fisk! I was at all 3 games in this Angels series, right behind the O's dugout. I got to see all our boys, and just simply love to watch this team play. And in true baseball fashion, the one game on paper we should have dominated (GRod vs. 8+ ERA Channing), we end up down 7-0 and lose. But watching Gunnar's homers, his electric triple, and he made a fantastic play today on a ball that went under Westburg's glove, Adley do Adley things, Cowser, holy crap. Kimbrel v. Trout with bases loaded, bottom of 9th, 2 outs, down by 2? That was fun. Next game Trout bats leadoff and torches a GRod fastball for a homer to the opposite field.  An observation.... If you didn't know anything about the team, and you only watched game 1 batting practice, you'd think Cowser and O'Hearn were the studs of the team. Mountcastle was taking BP with the reserves and he put on a show as well.  Home after 3 straight days watching this O's team, so jealous of the Balt fans in Balt that get to see the team with regularity. It's a special bunch.
    • emmett16 is right. Uppercut swings produce a lot of groundouts because the bat is not on the same plane as the ball for very long. The best swing stays on the same plane as the ball for a longer time. This will produce contact that creates backspin on the ball which makes it carry. That Ted Williams book is one of the best hitting books ever written.
    • I have to admit. I'm an addict. I'm an addict not of booze or drugs. I'm an addict for baseball .... It's still THE game for me and I love almost any team sport. But for me, when it's great, it's still the greatest game of them all. I hate to say it, but when my team wins ...it's like a hit of crack or coke and I have never and will never try those drugs. This one is a better high anyway. It's an adrenaline rush for me. It comes from my heart and soul. Like the other night in Anaheim I sat transfixed on the game. I dont need to look at the silly shell games on a scoreboard, nor hear what the players favorite singer is.. or eat a lot of junk, but I DO have to have my bag of peanuts. The Orioles were clinging to a one run lead, when, with the bases loaded, Mike Trout stepped up to the plate...a single and the game is tied...an extra base hit and the Orioles lose. Our pitcher Craig Kimbrel had to throw a strike to one of the all time greats, and somehow, someway, Trout looked at a third strike and the Orioles won. I lept into the air as if I had a million dollars on the game. I never bet on sports, but this was a better high than winning any bet anyway. Because it is pure and it comes from my deep place of caring when the 'Birds' win. Today in Anaheim, another nail biter, the game was in the ninth with two out and a runner on first. Suddenly the runner broke for second and catcher James McCann threw a strike to second base. Gunnar Henderson covering, made the tag and the ump called the runner out. And the game ended that way. Bang Bang. Personally I thought it was a blown call, but after review the call was upheld and the Orioles won another nail biter. I dont watch many other games, but every night I hit the crack pipe" of baseball. It's my addiction. I also love watching fantastic performers. Mookie Betts is an electric ballplayer . can do anything at the plate and in the field. The Orioles' Henderson is a must see ballplayer like Betts is. On Wednesday he hit a home run, a double, a single, drove in 3 runs got hit by a pitch , stole a base and made two game saving plays in the field. Baseball is a team sport but it's also watching the brilliant, mesmerizing individual performances. It's watching the best players in the world do what I think is the most difficult thing in sports , hit a baseball, throw a baseball, and field a baseball. It's hard to do. Anyway,it's still just April and it's a long, long season. Bryant Gumble once had a great line about the difference between football and baseball. He said "Baseball, is a never ending romance, but football is a one night stand." Yep, I'm an addict, a baseball junkie, and I make no apologies for it. I'll never go to rehab for my baseball addiction. I don't NEED to be cured. And I never will be. Jim Bouton said it best in "Ball Four" his great book. "In all the years you grip a baseball...you suddenly remember, it's really the other way around" Exactly.
    • Especially when you factor in the DL Hall trade too.  Suarez and Wells get bumped to the pen only if Bradish and Means are effective starters a decent part of the season.  Would the O's promote Povich or McDermott to pitch relief?  My guess is not anytime soon, but I dunno. A trade would for one or two arms would be best, but trading for good relief pitching is only harder now because so many teams can make the playoffs.  
    • But O'Hearn's numbers are inflated because he never bats against lefties, plus he's trash in the outfield.  If Santander's hitting does not improve this season of course you don't give him a QO, but that's unlikely.  He'll probably pick it up as the weather heats up.  Plus Tony plays at least a decent RF and can play first base too.   Like others have said, should the O's offer Santander a QO?  Maybe -- it depends on how he performs and how Kjerstad and Stowers perform.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...