Jump to content

Orioles Trade Targets?


Nite

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
In all honesty, the rays have EXACTLY what we need.

Joyce is the lefty bat/obp guy we desperately need on this team at the top of the order and price is the ace pitcher we need to become a true WS contender.

I wonder what type of package it would take to get both?

Maybe bundy + e-rod + berry + a lesser prospect + money?

Would that be enough? Something to consider possibly....

Not even close. It will take two of Bundy/Harvey/KG ...Feidman is not an idiot.

What KG is doing right now is exactly why you do not trade him, Bundy or KG.

Thankfully our GM seems to get that.

To be a contender means you have to get in the playoffs. Once your there talent helps but there is an element of luck and getting hot at the right time. You do not piss away your future on that. You keep it and make sure you get multiple shots at that championship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article from NY Daily News regarding Yankee targets

The Phillies ?have been sniffing around, they?re sellers,? the executive said, so, as one potential example, maybe the Yanks can convince them to do a ?06 repeat.

Wouldn?t Cliff Lee be a rotation upgrade? Would a package of low-ceiling minor-leaguers be enough if the Yanks eat the $50 million or so left on Lee?s contract? A.J. Burnett has less money coming, but maybe fits into the same sort of mold, though the executive said he believes Burnett ultimately will be dealt to Baltimore, near where Burnett lives.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/mccarron-flawed-yankees-spend-victory-weak-al-east-article-1.1864245?utm_content=buffer663a1&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=NYDailyNewsTw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article from NY Daily News regarding Yankee targets

The Phillies ?have been sniffing around, they?re sellers,? the executive said, so, as one potential example, maybe the Yanks can convince them to do a ?06 repeat.

Wouldn?t Cliff Lee be a rotation upgrade? Would a package of low-ceiling minor-leaguers be enough if the Yanks eat the $50 million or so left on Lee?s contract? A.J. Burnett has less money coming, but maybe fits into the same sort of mold, though the executive said he believes Burnett ultimately will be dealt to Baltimore, near where Burnett lives.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/mccarron-flawed-yankees-spend-victory-weak-al-east-article-1.1864245?utm_content=buffer663a1&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=NYDailyNewsTw

Cliff Lee must have a right to refuse being traded to certain teams. I believe his wife was treated badly by Yankee fans. Thus, he didn't consider them when he was a FA. He may not want to be a Yankee still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Article from NY Daily News regarding Yankee targets

The Phillies ?have been sniffing around, they?re sellers,? the executive said, so, as one potential example, maybe the Yanks can convince them to do a ?06 repeat.

Wouldn?t Cliff Lee be a rotation upgrade? Would a package of low-ceiling minor-leaguers be enough if the Yanks eat the $50 million or so left on Lee?s contract? A.J. Burnett has less money coming, but maybe fits into the same sort of mold, though the executive said he believes Burnett ultimately will be dealt to Baltimore, near where Burnett lives.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/baseball/yankees/mccarron-flawed-yankees-spend-victory-weak-al-east-article-1.1864245?utm_content=buffer663a1&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=NYDailyNewsTw

Pretty certain the ship has sailed with Burnett, 37 year old with a 3.83 ERA. Gausman is our big pitching upgrade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've been hearing that living near Baltimore is a factor for AJ for years and years. And it never is.

According to MLBTR:

  • A.J. Burnett wants to stay with the Phillies, MLB.com’s Todd Zolecki writes. “I’m not a guy who looks for an out or wants to get out because things aren’t going the right way,” says Burnett. “If that happens, then it happens, but I’m not looking to move on. This is my team.” Burnett has a limited no-trade clause, and says he isn’t sure how he would respond if the Phillies asked him to waive it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to MLBTR:
  • A.J. Burnett wants to stay with the Phillies, MLB.com’s Todd Zolecki writes. “I’m not a guy who looks for an out or wants to get out because things aren’t going the right way,” says Burnett. “If that happens, then it happens, but I’m not looking to move on. This is my team.” Burnett has a limited no-trade clause, and says he isn’t sure how he would respond if the Phillies asked him to waive it.

Yeah...don't know what it is, but I just get the feeling that Burnett has no desire to pitch for the O's. I just can't believe that its OPACY. The stadium in Philly is a bit of a bandbox as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thankfully our GM seems to get that.

To be a contender means you have to get in the playoffs. Once your there talent helps but there is an element of luck and getting hot at the right time.

You do not piss away your future on that. You keep it and make sure you get multiple shots at that championship

Right and I keep seeing these threads or posts asking if we can put together a package to get the Rays players. Why? We should deplete our system to build up a division rival?

It's not whether the Rays will trade within the division it's will we, risking our future to build up a team in a better bargaining position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...don't know what it is, but I just get the feeling that Burnett has no desire to pitch for the O's. I just can't believe that its OPACY. The stadium in Philly is a bit of a bandbox as well.

It might be something simple as not liking to pitch in the AL East.

Or maybe he likes hitting. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would you guys think about kicking the tires on Dan Uggla? It's looking increasingly like the Braves could outright him, similar to Mark Reynolds last season. He has a pretty decent track record of hitting, although he's been pretty mediocre to bad the last 1.5 years. He's got reverse splits over his career, so platooning him with Flash vs. LHP wouldn't really do much for us, but it's an interesting scenario nonetheless. Worst case scenario we release him if he doesn't work out. Maybe he would allow us to send Schoop back down to work on some stuff at AAA (I'm on the fence as to whether I want him here for the full season or not) and save his service clock. Anyone know what the deal with him is? A lot of his ratios, save FB/HR looked fairly consistent with his career norms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What would you guys think about kicking the tires on Dan Uggla? It's looking increasingly like the Braves could outright him, similar to Mark Reynolds last season. He has a pretty decent track record of hitting, although he's been pretty mediocre to bad the last 1.5 years. He's got reverse splits over his career, so platooning him with Flash vs. LHP wouldn't really do much for us, but it's an interesting scenario nonetheless. Worst case scenario we release him if he doesn't work out. Maybe he would allow us to send Schoop back down to work on some stuff at AAA (I'm on the fence as to whether I want him here for the full season or not) and save his service clock. Anyone know what the deal with him is? A lot of his ratios, save FB/HR looked fairly consistent with his career norms.

I'd much rather run Schoop out there. Not interested in Uggla. Our defense would take a huge hit. Also, I'd have very little interest in a guy who's getting himself suspended by his own team while in first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...don't know what it is, but I just get the feeling that Burnett has no desire to pitch for the O's. I just can't believe that its OPACY. The stadium in Philly is a bit of a bandbox as well.

AJ doesn't want to play here? What would give you that impression? Is the fact he passed on us at least twice despite having a home in Monkton?

:)

But yet...people keep bring up this overrated pitcher...who cares....you would think the guy was Walter Johnson:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ doesn't want to play here? What would give you that impression? Is the fact he passed on us at least twice despite having a home in Monkton?

:)

But yet...people keep bring up this overrated pitcher...who cares....you would think the guy was Walter Johnson:)

Who's over rating him? It was never about that. It was about looking at our depth of young pitching and having a bridge to them.

Bottom line: I'd still prefer one year of Burnett, who has pitched better after a slow start, to three more years of Jimenez. Even if he tanks the rest of the year, with the emergence of Gausman, Burnett or any other short term option would have been a better bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Hopefully, if they have to trade Gunnar it's with a year and a half of control instead of a rental to maximize the return.
    • Gunnar would be the main one at this point. It's going to take the Witt contract plus, but he's the kind of player that you can build around on a 10 year deal.   There's a plenty of other options but I'd rather start with him. If he's not interested then you move on...all depending on what ownership will go for as well.
    • Just look at the Braves. Stuck with all those players and in 2nd place.
    • In a traditional/historical sense, Gunnar would more likely reside in the 3, 4 or 5 spots in the lineup. But this new-age baseball that we have seen evolve over the last few years does seem to place more of a priority on getting your best hitters the most ABs. As others have mentioned, look at Soto in his career, look at Ohtani, etc. But what hasn't been mentioned (that I've seen, maybe I missed it) is that this new era of baseball also shows us that a sub .200 hitter can be successful in the leadoff spot when they mash like Schwarber does for the Phils. I think it's just as likely that Hyder keeps penciling in Gunnar in the top spot because Gunnar feels comfortable there but also because of his ability to set the table for the rest of the lineup to start the game. That is really what the leadoff guy's job is to do. He's lead off with a homer what, five times this year? That's five games where the O's were on the board just one batter into their turn to hit. For a younger lineup like the O's have now, I think it's extremely important that they use whatever advantage they think they have as early in the game as possible. We've seen them struggle to score runs early in a lot of the games this year. They don't ever seem to lay down but battling from behind is not the ideal position to be, especially at the frequency that has been so far this year. I suspect that increased pressure may eventually catch up with them. So, yeah, if Gunnar is their best power hitter but also gives the team the best opportunity to score early, I'm fine with him hitting first in the order even if it means fewer guys on base when he's at the plate.   
    • Hell my Golden Retriever could call a better game than last night. Trouble is, you'd have a lot of spit balls! 
    • I think Kyle Gibson has it right: The more I hear about the robot umps, the less I like the idea but I think technology should be used and replay would be good.  Should be very easy and very fast…ala tennis.
    • There is something to what Roy says. Overall in MLB this year: vs a starter 1st time through the order, all MLB teams OPS .694 vs a starter 2nd time through the order, all MLB teams OPS .694 vs a starter 3rd time through the order, all MLB teams OPS .755 [4th time and beyond, only 114 plate appearances in all of MLB this year:  .725] So it is expected that you will do your best work the 3rd time through the order vs a starter, and will be a bit worse off the first time through. The Orioles on the season (keep in mind we are a way better than average offense so our overall #s should in general be better than the MLB average): 1st time:  .658 OPS  2nd time:  .817 OPS 3rd time:  .816 OPS 4th+ (7 plate appearances): 1.572 OPS So we are a very slow starting team, so far this year.   We have a well above average offense that is actually significantly below average the first time through the order vs a starter. I don't know why this is... but so far it has been the case.   I'll not that before the Seattle series the numbers were even more extreme, we OPSed just .615 1TTTO when I looked it up last week.   Maybe with time this will even out, but the point is, Roy isn't imagining things.   At the start of the game, we are a below average MLB offense this year and as the game progresses we get way above average.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...