Jump to content

This is nothing compared to 1969


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1969 was in the World Series, ditto 1979 which was another extremely bitter loss. WADR to Frobby, who I doubt followed , and hung on, every game of 1969, unlike 2014, this one stings a lot more. I'd much rather lose in the World Series than this, but we don't get to make that decision.

P.S. I was in second grade in 1969, and I'd bet most fans here were not born yet ;)

I was I still can't believe we lost to the Mets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well there is a board for that. Most of us have come here to discuss the Os and try to get over the loss. Those of us who are not Ravens fans don't want to hear about how "it's football season, go Ravens." I'm just saying, if you wanna talk Ravens, there's a place for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Colts losing to Joe Willy Namath and the Jets was much more horrific in that same year!! I can still see Earl Morrall not even seeing a wide open Jimmy Orr on that flea flicker play in the first half....Good grief!!

I agree but that was so questionable how he didn't even look Orr's way as the primary receiver and Shula had called that play I have always wondered if the rumors that the mob had threatened Earl's family weren't true as how often did he ever do anything that inexplicable before or after as he was a smart QB ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree but that was so questionable how he didn't even look Orr's way as the primary receiver and Shula had called that play I have always wondered if the rumors that the mob had threatened Earl's family weren't true as how often did he ever do anything that inexplicable before or after as he was a smart QB ?

Bubba Smith always said in interviews years later that he thought that the game had been fixed. Dont know, but there were lots of strange things, like that ball that bounced off Tom Mitchell in the end zone for an interception, that flea flicker and Shula waiting forever to put in Unitas.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me say, I've been traveling overseas and didn't see the last two games, or much of the first two. And while I'm annoyed to lose to a team I KNOW in my heart isn't as good as us, in four games no less, I've lived through far worse postseason disasters, especially watching the 1969 loss to the Mets. 45 years and that still stings beyond belief. This season, on the other hand, was a great one that I will look back on fondly despite the rout by the Royals. And wait 'till next year!

I wasn't even close to being alive for the Mets loss. The loss to the Royals blows hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't even close to being alive for the Mets loss. The loss to the Royals blows hard.

Right same here. Heck at 27, I've never witnessed so much as a pennant. I understand where Frobby is coming from but this one really hurts. I really thought especially after sweeping the Tigers we could win the pennant:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bubba Smith always said in interviews years later that he thought that the game had been fixed. Dont know, but there were lots of strange things, like that ball that bounced off Tom Mitchell in the end zone for an interception, that flea flicker and Shula waiting forever to put in Unitas.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Yeah Tom Mitchell was so wide open in the end zone that Earl could have lobbed it left handed for a td yet he threw it like a rocket hitting him in the shoulder pad and richocheting up in the air for an easy pick. Bad luck? Looked suspicius to me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1969, 1971, 1979, 1982 and 1996 were all worse than this year.
Might as well throw in 1997 when we went wire-to-wire and Armando Benitez handed two games to the Indians, who would reach the WS for their first time since "some guy" named Bob Feller pitched for them. I was in Toronto for the game when we clinched the '97 division title.

'71 was the Clemente Series, and I remember little beyond that. The bigger heartbreak to me that time was Bob Short skipping town weeks before with the Senators. To this day, "We are Family" still infuriates me from 1979, my freshman semester at MD. 1982 was one day after my mother died, and my father and I went to the Friday night DH to try to feel normal. Perspective on that, baseball seemed way more inconsequential that year. 1996, I was driving back from my godmother's funeral in SC, when I heard about he who must not be named reaching over the fence in Game 1.Game 5, 1996 ALCS was probably the last game I went to with my father.

Ranking them?

1979

1997

2014.. then the rest

So having said all that, are we supposed to get some solace from this year by comparing it to other disappointments?

Well, it's not working for me. Sorry to say.

Give this a few years to see if the soreness recedes as does those other years that burn only when you really think back on them. I've seen the Orioles in the Series, my son hasn't. He's only known two postseasons in his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right same here. Heck at 27, I've never witnessed so much as a pennant. I understand where Frobby is coming from but this one really hurts. I really thought especially after sweeping the Tigers we could win the pennant:

Heck, I would have taken a competitive ALCS at this point. Losing four games in a row to end the season is very hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please take the Ravens comments to the Ravens board. We aren't all Ravens fans.

I'll take the high road......

A majority of us who were raised in Baltimore are just as much Ravens fans as we are Orioles fans, and we will hopefully find some solace for our Orioles pain in Ravens success. May you find the same in whatever football team you follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My father was from Baltimore (which is why I'm an O's fan in Iowa), and he could hardly speak of the '69 series or the Jets' Super Bowl win without getting visibly upset. Growing up, those were simply not mentioned in casual conversation when he was around.

For me, I was just a little kid in '69 and '70, so the '71 series is the first I really remember watching, so that one stings for me a bit.

But the '79 series was the worst. To be up 3-1, and then blow it--all with the media openly rooting for the Pirates and all that 'We Are Family' junk. To this day I hate that song. They played it at my wedding (it was a song my wife's family plays at all family occasions) and I recall refusing to dance to it, though I also recall she eventually talked me into going out with her family and being a good sport about it.

But I hated it. Every second of that stupid Sister Sledge song. Still hate it. Always will. All because of that stupid 1979 World Series. So yeah, today's not so bad, considering. At last there's no theme song to torture us for the next 35 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Back to Nick, he’s one of my 5-6 favorite Orioles of all time, even though you wouldn’t put him in the 5-6 best.  Just tremendously steady and reliable.  And, he came along during a really dark period for the Orioles as well as their minor league system.  I used to refer to him as “the Boy Who Lived” because he was the only decent player our farm system produced over a 7-8 year period. I’ll never forget that shot of him on the field after the O’s clinched the AL East, taking in the scene with a tear in his eye.  That’s more memorable to me than any of the great things he did on the field.   I will make every effort to be at his induction ceremony, even though I know his acceptance speech is likely to be forgettable.  Because I’ll never forget his importance to the franchise.    
    • Honestly, if you are asking me what I would do. I play Mateo more right now because he is outperforming Urias. I would also, give Mayo some time in RF at AAA. And I would leave Holliday down at AAA as well. I wouldn't feel rushed to make a move right now and I would probably reevaluate things some time in June. I would not recall Holliday until he has had at least 60 days (2 months time at AAA) and he would have to be mashing at that time and shown that he has worked on the things that they have asked him.  I would not bring up Mayo until he has had adequate time to adjust to the OF. To answer your question, I would not bring up Mayo to play 3B. It creates an unnecessary problem for you both now and later. If the O's are not planning to trade Mayo (which I hope they don't), the most likely scenario is that he is going to move out of the infield because his defense is not good enough. Lastly, if by June/ early July Santander hasn't picked it up, then I would give Mayo or Kjerstad a serious look in RF. The reason that I say RF for Mayo is that he has a very strong arm and pretty decent mobility for a guy his size, but I don't think that the glove is good enough for the INF at a high level in the Major Leagues. I also, wouldn't expect Mayo/Holliday/Cowser/Kjerstad to put up an .800+ OPS in their first go round in the Major Leagues. I don't think that is a realistic expectation at all for a guy making the jump for the first time.
    • Many of Tiger’s injuries were due to circumstances fully within his control.   Just sayin’.
    • I think it is as simple as that they believe until Holliday gets sorted out and returns, his bat on the bench and as a part-time starter makes them a bit better team than their other roster alternatives. Given that you have Santander in the last year of his deal and Mullins and Hays in their last two seasons, you don't really have the long-term outfield depth that would tempt you to move him for a short-term bullpen fix. He likely goes back to Norfolk when Holliday comes up, depending on injuries, if Cowser hits a major slump, how he plays in the part-time role, etc, etc, but they are willing to sacrifice some of his AAA playing time and development to be better in the short term. I don't have a problem with that.
    • Now we’re on to Mateo.  Nope.  My turn to ask the question.   If Mayo comes up and is average defensively at 3B and puts up an .800+ OPS at 3B and Westburg continues to hit and plays 2B what do you do with Holliday short term and long term? ”Last scenario, if he does great on both sides of the ball, what do you do with Holliday for the rest of this season and long term?”
    • No, I don't have Holliday penciled into the HOF. I never said that. What I said is that I believe in his talent. I don't think that many people got it wrong in his evaluation.  I also don't believe that Mayo's defense is anywhere close to good enough to be an All-star caliber 3B. But I do believe that is possible (maybe even very for Westburg). I'm not sure that professional sports is a meritocracy. In that the more talent/ability that you have, the more opportunities that you will get. That probably explains why Holliday got the first crack at the Bigs over Norby (and even Mayo to a degree).  Last thing, right now Mateo is performing best at the other INF spot (second best). Do you want him to stay/get more playing time right now?
    • They will be cautious with Holliday now.  I am sure they would hate to have to send him down a second time.  I'm thinking mid-season for Holliday if all goes well in Norfolk.  If he struggles down there, which isn't out of the realm of possibility, it could be delayed further.  Mayo is destroying the ball and should get the call next.  There is a spot for him at third with Westburg moving to second. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...