Jump to content

Pressbox: Position battles


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Paul does a nice job of outlining the ST battles.

1) Lefty Lough vs righty Reimold for the last OF spot and leadoff vs lefties.

Lough is out for options. Reimold is on a minor league contract. Bet on Lough to start the season.

2) Starting pitching. Ubaldo has to beat out one of the O's top five starters or go to pen. Bet on the pen.

3) Pen. Matusz vs Webb vs Garcia vs Verrett for one spot. Bet on a trade or two. Or maybe someone to the DL.

http://www.pressboxonline.com/2015/02/12/2015-orioles-spring-training-preview-position-battles

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

On 3) Pen, I think it could play out slightly differently.

Britton

O'Day

Hunter

Wright

Brach

that's 5 I have "in"

If a starter is traded or Gausman is optioned, that opens things up a lot.

So the Matusz vs Webb vs Garcia vs Verrett battle could be for 2 spots, which makes a huge difference.

I'm not as down on Matusz as most, and I really want to keep the flame-throwing Garcia if he looks good in ST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3) Pen, I think it could play out slightly differently.

Britton

O'Day

Hunter

Wright

Brach

that's 5 I have "in"

If a starter is traded or Gausman is optioned, that opens things up a lot.

So the Matusz vs Webb vs Garcia vs Verrett battle could be for 2 spots, which makes a huge difference.

I'm not as down on Matusz as most, and I really want to keep the flame-throwing Garcia if he looks good in ST.

I don't see the O's trading a starter. I think DD and Buck know they were lucky last year to dodge injuries to the starters. It probably will not happen again this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading Matusz would open things up without us having to give up a starter. I would accept a bag of balls at this point. Then we could go with Garcia plus Miguel in the bullpen along with the five guys mentioned by ven6 and a rotation of Tillman, Chen, Norris, Ubaldo, Gausman.

If Ubaldo really stinks in the spring that could also force our hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading Matusz would open things up without us having to give up a starter. I would accept a bag of balls at this point. Then we could go with Garcia plus Miguel in the bullpen along with the five guys mentioned by ven6 and a rotation of Tillman, Chen, Norris, Ubaldo, Gausman.

If Ubaldo really stinks in the spring that could also force our hand.

I like that DD and Buck keep all their options open. Performance, injury, etc. can all decide how this needs to go and we don't have to make any decision at all until going north. Maybe Matusz looks great and they showcase him for a trade for more than a bag of balls. Maybe the Rule 5s show a lot less than what we think. DD and Buck will likely play it all the way out to get the best possible mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading Matusz would open things up without us having to give up a starter. I would accept a bag of balls at this point. Then we could go with Garcia plus Miguel in the bullpen along with the five guys mentioned by ven6 and a rotation of Tillman, Chen, Norris, Ubaldo, Gausman.

If Ubaldo really stinks in the spring that could also force our hand.

Not sure if anyone would give up a bag of balls for him.

Maybe if the O's bought the bag of balls, for say a million dollars...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Webb is going to make the team. He's a good regular season pitcher and a great fit for our defense. Proven 7th inning guy who we owe guaranteed money too. With the off days at the beginning of the year I could see us use Gausman and Gonzo's options and carry 8 relievers for the first 2 weeks.

Tillman

Chen

Norris

Ubaldo

1. Britton

2. O'day

3. Hunter

4. Brach

5. Matusz

6. W.Wright

7. Webb

8. Verrett/Garcia

When we need a starter we have 3 options. Give back the rule 5 guy. Trade Webb. Trade Matusz. I wonder if Webb would clear waivers with his salary because he is not an MLB minimum guy? That could be an option as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if anyone would give up a bag of balls for him.

Maybe if the O's bought the bag of balls, for say a million dollars...

Jeremy Guthrie had done far less in the majors than Matusz. That being said, he was selected off waivers. We were able to trade Troy Patton and his 1.2M salary for Nick Hundley, and Patton has way less value than Patton did IMO, despite the salary. I would have liked a deal like Lough and Matusz for Dom Brown, but that isn't going to happen (nor should it at this point with Snider on board). I could see us getting a bag of balls for him or something for Webb/Hunter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Webb is going to make the team. He's a good regular season pitcher and a great fit for our defense. Proven 7th inning guy who we owe guaranteed money too. With the off days at the beginning of the year I could see us use Gausman and Gonzo's options and carry 8 relievers for the first 2 weeks.

Tillman

Chen

Norris

Ubaldo

1. Britton

2. O'day

3. Hunter

4. Brach

5. Matusz

6. W.Wright

7. Webb

8. Verrett/Garcia

When we need a starter we have 3 options. Give back the rule 5 guy. Trade Webb. Trade Matusz. I wonder if Webb would clear waivers with his salary because he is not an MLB minimum guy? That could be an option as well.

IMO the problem with your plan is that Gausman and Gonzo are much better pitchers than Matusz and Webb. Buck is going to want to keep the more talented pitchers on the major league 25 man roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paul does a nice job of outlining the ST battles.

1) Lefty Lough vs righty Reimold for the last OF spot and leadoff vs lefties.

Lough is out for options. Reimold is on a minor league contract. Bet on Lough to start the season.

2) Starting pitching. Ubaldo has to beat out one of the O's top five starters or go to pen. Bet on the pen.

3) Pen. Matusz vs Webb vs Garcia vs Verrett for one spot. Bet on a trade or two. Or maybe someone to the DL.

http://www.pressboxonline.com/2015/02/12/2015-orioles-spring-training-preview-position-battles

1) I thought Lough was going to be pretty close to a lock anyway since he's a great defender and really heated up in the second half. The fact that he is out of options makes him a slam dunk imo.

2) I would like to see Ubaldo start in the pen as well, but since he is our highest paid pitcher I don't see it happening unless he is awful in ST.

3) My money would be on Garcia to make the club if he does well in ST. The simple fact that he throws 100 is enticing enough to give him a try. We saw how that worked out for Britton last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that DD and Buck keep all their options open. Performance, injury, etc. can all decide how this needs to go and we don't have to make any decision at all until going north. Maybe Matusz looks great and they showcase him for a trade for more than a bag of balls. Maybe the Rule 5s show a lot less than what we think. DD and Buck will likely play it all the way out to get the best possible mix.

I think this is a really good point. Like a lot of others, I'm a bit frustrated that we A) tendered Matusz a contract and B) haven't moved him, especially after signing Wesley Wright. All that said, there's a lot of merit to flexibility throughout spring training; at present, we're looking at a glut of pitchers with potential (not only the six starters for five spots, but also the numerous bullpen options we have), but that could easily be thinned out by injuries and ineffectiveness. In a perfect world, one of the rule V guys impresses and we're able to keep him, while dealing a more expensive bullpen piece (either Matusz or, less likely, Webb) for a respectable return. However, both of these guys could get into camp and struggle, and we'll just send them back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Roch mentions in today's post, the roster structure gets a bit more complicated if Wieters can't play behind the plate.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2015/02/wondering-about-wieters-if-he-isnt-ready-to-catch.html

Carrying the equivalent of a third catcher would complicate Showalter's roster construction. Who's the odd man out in this scenario?

For the sake of argument, let's say that Wieters is the designated hitter, Alejandro De Aza is the left fielder, Travis Snider is the right fielder and Chris Davis is the first baseman after serving the final game of his suspension. Delmon Young and Steve Pearce are extra outfielders and Ryan Flaherty is the utility infielder. The winner of the backup catcher competition completes the four-man bench.

How does David Lough fit into this equation?

There's no way that Young and Pearce fail to make the club, and Showalter needs a utility infielder and backup catcher. Flaherty isn't a lock - Paul Janish is considered a plus defender at shortstop and he's spent parts of six seasons in the majors - but he's the favorite heading into camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO, finding a trade partner for Matuzs and DeAza is the best possible scenario. I would look to move both of those guys for minor league depth. A decent prospect or two for the future, without further complication of the roster. Just my two cents.

Why would you trade DeAza when he is most likely the starting LF?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • The missed third strike on Justin Turner in the 8th inning was one of the worst calls I've seen. He got lucky with the pitch clock strikeout to Devers but Baker gets out of that inning without giving up a run if that's called correctly. 
    • This is a pretty broad leap from signing Frazier, or trading Lopez, leading to Grayson being in in a mid-relief role. 
    • 1: I literally said, "there is big downside risk obviously." 2: Vick improved his passing in his early 30s before I think he got hurt and lost his starting job.  Lamar could do the same, which would counteract his loss of athleticism.  A ton of other quarbacks that improved in their late 20s early 30s.  Geno Smith wasn't a starter until he was, at age 33.  Alex Smith had worse accuracy numbers than Lamar for the first 5 years of his career before he figured it out.  You speak in absolutes as if you know exactly what's going to happen in the future with Lamar. 3: In 2029 you might be looking at backup qbs with 20 million salaries.  He'll still be tradeable if you really want to walk from him.  If you think he should be tradeable now then he'll likely be tradeable in 4-5 years. 4: Maybe we have different definitions of baggage, but when I think baggage, I think Aaron Rodgers going on darkness retreats and keeping the Packers in contract limbo for like 5 straight years.  Or Russell Wilson's office and plane ride antics.  Or Deshaun Watson.  Or Myles Garrett when he swung his helmet.  Lamar is negotiating a contract.  Poorly?  maybe, but that's not really baggage.
    • Not disagreeing with you it’s just a team that would likely trade for Urias would be “contending”.  Those types of teams just don’t trade away pitching. They don’t. So we’re looking at a prospect return, when right now we need MLB immediate help. 
    • Totally agree. The guy is a buffoon pure and simple. Might actually be WORSE than his father. I am starting to feel like this team will not be sold and we will be stuck w/ mediocrity for decades more to come. Prove me wrong John! Extend Adley and Gunnar and sign some bigger free agents next off season.
    • We desperately need Grayson to pitch his way into our rotation so that we can bump Wells to the pen. We might be better with Voth in the rotation over Wells right now because we need MR/SU help bad. 
    • I know that they played the same positions last year at Fenway, but I almost wonder if it would make more sense to just leave Hays in LF and Santander in RF (when he's in the OF) regardless of stadium. I get the logic of Hays covering more ground, but there is an adjustment to how the ball comes off the bat and I wonder if the overall defense throughout the course of the season would be improved if they consistently get the same looks, playing the same positions. Ultimately, it probably doesn't matter, but just me wondering. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...