Jump to content

2016 Offseason Redo


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1. Trumbo trade good insurance for Davis, made sense I'd do it since you gave up nothing;

2. Sign Davis for less;

3. Do not sign Alvarez, Kim, or Gallardo, but sign Zimmerman (which is what I advocated at the time);

4. sign O'Day as that was good sign;

5. Work hard to lock up Manny;

6. Do not offer QA to Wieters (Disclaimer: At the time I assumed he would turn it down also, so I can't get on DD about that)

7. Sign Fowler

Got to hope Zimmermann's MRI goes well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Sign Chris Carter to DH

2. Trade for Adam Lind to play 1B

3. Keep Miguel Gonzalez if he passed the physical

4. Take a look at any FA's who didn't require compensation (Happ/Kazmir/Cespedes)

5. Not resigned O'Day or Davis. No compensation offer for Wieters

6. Not traded Clevenger for Trumbo

7. Not signed Gallardo

8. Re-signed Steve Pearce to play LF/1B

With the benefit of hindsight, you'd rather have Clevenger, Pearce, Carter, Lind (and comp pick) over Trumbo, Davis, and Wieters?

Lind has an 64 OPS+ and has been on base 30 times. Davis has walked 25 times.

With no clear improvements to the pitching, that's way too much offense to give up, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Sign Chris Carter to DH

2. Trade for Adam Lind to play 1B

3. Keep Miguel Gonzalez if he passed the physical

4. Take a look at any FA's who didn't require compensation (Happ/Kazmir/Cespedes)

5. Not resigned O'Day or Davis. No compensation offer for Wieters

6. Not traded Clevenger for Trumbo

7. Not signed Gallardo

8. Re-signed Steve Pearce to play LF/1B

How can anyone not LOVE the Clevenger for Trumbo deal? An absolute steal and probably some of Dan's best work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the start of the offseason I wanted three major moves:

a) resign Davis

b) sign Jordan Zimmerman

c) extend Machado

Everything else was small potatoes. I didn't know the budget would increase as much as it did however. What would I do with the benefit of hindsight?

1) Trumbo. Yeah. Definitely. DH him.

2) Wieters. No. Spend that $$ elsewhere. Sign Geovany Soto (1 yr, $3 mil) to share with Caleb Joseph as a bridge to Chance Sisco.

3) Davis. I wanted him anyway, so yes.

4) O'Day. With the increased budget, happily so.

5) Rickard. Was looking at other Rule 5 possibilities but no complaints. Correct position to draft.

6) Kim. No -- would have signed Matt Joyce for LF. Minimum.

7) Alvarez. No -- Trumbo would be the primary DH with Joyce second.

8) Gallardo. NO. Mat Latos can do just as well for much less (1 yr, $4 mil to beat the Chi-Sox)

9) Gonzalez. Would have non-tendered him before spring training.

So, that's about $23 mil saved I think between Wieters, Kim, Gallardo, Gonzalez and their replacements. Brian Matusz would be an additional $4 mil gone. With that theoretical money, I outbid the Mets and their 3 year deal for Yoenis Cespedes, RF and keep all the draft picks.

So endeth the dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the start of the offseason I wanted three major moves:

a) resign Davis

b) sign Jordan Zimmerman

c) extend Machado

Everything else was small potatoes. I didn't know the budget would increase as much as it did however. What would I do with the benefit of hindsight?

1) Trumbo. Yeah. Definitely. DH him.

2) Wieters. No. Spend that $$ elsewhere. Sign Geovany Soto (1 yr, $3 mil) to share with Caleb Joseph as a bridge to Chance Sisco.

3) Davis. I wanted him anyway, so yes.

4) O'Day. With the increased budget, happily so.

5) Rickard. Was looking at other Rule 5 possibilities but no complaints. Correct position to draft.

6) Kim. No -- would have signed Matt Joyce for LF. Minimum.

7) Alvarez. No -- Trumbo would be the primary DH with Joyce second.

8) Gallardo. NO. Mat Latos can do just as well for much less (1 yr, $4 mil to beat the Chi-Sox)

9) Gonzalez. Would have non-tendered him before spring training.

So, that's about $23 mil saved I think between Wieters, Kim, Gallardo, Gonzalez and their replacements. Brian Matusz would be an additional $4 mil gone. With that theoretical money, I outbid the Mets and their 3 year deal for Yoenis Cespedes, RF and keep all the draft picks.

So endeth the dream.

I like that one. I wanted Cespedes as well. No comp pick. The only player in our budget I wanted to give a pick up for was Heyward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are pretending PA isn't owner, then the best chance would have been Upton. How does that look now?

That needs another thread. This one plays by the rules in place. And the other one when someone makes it will be put in the fantasy forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think signing Fowler instead of Pedro is he only thing reasonable.maybe try to lock down Manny or offer Davis less.
The problem with most of these redo's is many would require opt outs and PA's rules don't allow that.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would of liked to see the O's have made a play for Pearce. Still not sure why DD seemed to push Pearce into the Chen tier of "Thanks for your time, but time to move on..." list of FAs at the beginning of last winter.

Pearce plays all over the diamond and has great pop for a bench bat. Don't look now but he's batting over .300 with 7 HR. And more importantly, he's walking more.

Probably could of had him for Kim's contract (2 yrs/7 mln)

Maybe, but Fowler was in the mix too. Plus we're pretty set on COF's. I'll root for Pearce. Not too hard this season if TB makes a run. Remember the more he plays the more his wrists flare up. Dude could never stay healthy over a season for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only one you could criticize him for is Gallardo.

Yea, I still don't get the interest in Gallardo. Before he was hurt. Then after the failed the physical I'd have just walked away. Again. Just take the PR hit, who cares if people are up in arms about not signing a bad pitcher?

I think you can also question $160M for Davis. Someone might have been able to sign him for 75% of that (although the deferred money makes the real value more like 75% anyway). Not me, but someone. It's nearly a guarantee that the Orioles will have $50M+ in dead money from lost years in that deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Chris Davis (<a href="https://twitter.com/CrushD19">@CrushD19</a>) is NEXT on <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/InsidePitch?src=hash">#InsidePitch</a> with <a href="https://twitter.com/CaseyStern">@CaseyStern</a></p>— MLB Network Radio (@MLBNetworkRadio) <a href="

">May 24, 2016</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • My mistake!  You are correct.  I had the games reversed.  Thanks for the correction.  
    • I wouldn't extend anyone just because they're a fan favorite, but rather because they're also an integral part of the core, and hard to replace. Something like Houston deciding Altuve was indispensable, but letting Correa walk. Those kind of moves both help you keep winning and demonstrate commitment to the fanbase. Gordon was 32 when he signed his extension, not exactly the same situation. 
    • Your memory is a little off.  We won the first game of that series, not the third.  Our offense was flying high at the time.  Then we lost those two games to Wainwright and Rom, and went into an offensive slump we never completely emerged from. The team lost four in a row (next two were agsinstTampa) for only the second time all year.  Starting with the Wainwright loss, the O’s only averaged 3.57 runs/game over the final 19 games of the year, after averaging 5.17 for the first 143 games.
    • Current fWAR leaderboard: # Name Team PA IP Bat WAR Pit WAR Total WAR 1 Shohei Ohtani LAD 214   3.0   3.0 2 Mookie Betts LAD 223   3.0   3.0 3 Kyle Tucker HOU 205   3.0   3.0 4 Gunnar Henderson BAL 198   2.8   2.
    • Yeah, I'm kinda under the assumption that it's gonna be a while. He looked really bad the first time and the team is performing without him. No reason to rush.
    • Well I hope Rubenstein knew that when he purchased the team.  
    • I don’t know. Heading into this season, I said I didn’t feel Gunnar’s defense at SS was so good that we should just assume Holliday doesn’t end up there.    Holliday does need to work on his arm strength and my assumption was always that he would. Now, maybe that assumption is wrong, I don’t know but at his age and time in development and the size of Gunnar, I still felt Holliday at SS and Gunnar at third would be the best total defensive lineup long term.  That doesn’t necessarily mean Holliday would be the better SS but that the combo of the 2 would be the best alignment (this also thinking Gunnar would be GG level at third but not SS) This year, I feel Gunnar has looked similar at SS although OAA likes him a lot more this year than last but stats like UZR and UZR/150 don’t. He is 36th in MLb in DRS and 6th at SS (4th in AL).  I was actually surprised to see his arm is “only” in the 77th percentile.     I can see Gunnar being a high OAA guy because I think his athleticism will simply allow him to make plays most players can’t. I think it’s fair to say that Gunnar is an above average defensive SS but how far above average is he and is he truly an elite defender at SS?  I don’t think so but maybe he can develop into one?  I feel confident he would be at third. I have said for a while that all the defensive alignment stuff will be wrapped around where Holliday and Gunnar end up. For now, it seems obvious Holliday isnt a SS option this year unless an injury occurs.    As to how that could change, I think it depends on Holliday. I still seriously doubt he ends up in CF. It’s not like he would be the first converted SS to end up out there and that’s arguably a more premium position than SS in todays game because of all the FB pitchers but it would still surprise me to see that be the long term move. I also think we are overlooking the Westburg factor here. They may believe, even with the arm not being overly strong, that he is the third baseman of the future.  Saying that, I have never doubted that Mayo could stick at third. I believe he can. I just didn’t believe it would happen here and I still don’t.   I still think he ends primarily at RF and first base.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...