Jump to content

Possible trade with Yankees that doesn’t involved Manny


millertime

Recommended Posts

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about what to believe and what not to believe about Angelos potentially nixing a trade that would send Manny to New York.  I honestly don’t know what to believe.  My personal opinion is you trade him to whatever team offers the best package for him but I certainly wouldn’t put it past Angelos to step in and nix a trade that would send him to the Bronx.

That being said,the Yankees have someone that I believe they’d at least consider trading if they get an attractive offer (that wouldn’t include Manny).  That player is Clint Frazier.  I know, I know...we need PITCHING.  No arguments from me on that HOWEVER the Yankees OF is LOADED right now so perhaps they’d be willing to trade him.  This is a guy who, not long ago, was being compared to Trout and again, just my personal opinion, had only just begun to tap into his potential.  I have no idea what the Yankees would want in return but shouldn’t we at least inquire???  I pay a TON of attention to prospects and I believe Frazier is the real deal so even though we NEED pitching, what’s the harm in asking what New York would want for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, millertime said:

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about what to believe and what not to believe about Angelos potentially nixing a trade that would send Manny to New York.  I honestly don’t know what to believe.  My personal opinion is you trade him to whatever team offers the best package for him but I certainly wouldn’t put it past Angelos to step in and nix a trade that would send him to the Bronx.

That being said,the Yankees have someone that I believe they’d at least consider trading if they get an attractive offer (that wouldn’t include Manny).  That player is Clint Frazier.  I know, I know...we need PITCHING.  No arguments from me on that HOWEVER the Yankees OF is LOADED right now so perhaps they’d be willing to trade him.  This is a guy who, not long ago, was being compared to Trout and again, just my personal opinion, had only just begun to tap into his potential.  I have no idea what the Yankees would want in return but shouldn’t we at least inquire???  I pay a TON of attention to prospects and I believe Frazier is the real deal so even though we NEED pitching, what’s the harm in asking what New York would want for him?

Why do we need another OF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, El Gordo said:

Why do we need another OF?

Why not?  Again, I pay close attention to all teams prospects and my personal opinion is that Clint Frazier is going to be a star sooner than later.  Not saying you have to believe that but depending on what the Yanks want for him, why not at least explore the option?  They say you can never have too much pitching but can’t that honestly be said about every position?  I’ve read more than one scouting report where Frazier has drawn Mike Trout comparisons.  I’m not gullible enough to believe he WILL become Trout but he’s obviously coveted by other teams and given the fact that the Yankees have a logjam in the OF, they might be willing to trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, millertime said:

Why not?  Again, I pay close attention to all teams prospects and my personal opinion is that Clint Frazier is going to be a star sooner than later.  Not saying you have to believe that but depending on what the Yanks want for him, why not at least explore the option?  They say you can never have too much pitching but can’t that honestly be said about every position?  I’ve read more than one scouting report where Frazier has drawn Mike Trout comparisons.  I’m not gullible enough to believe he WILL become Trout but he’s obviously coveted by other teams and given the fact that the Yankees have a logjam in the OF, they might be willing to trade him.

Hays, Mancini, Mountcastle, Mullins, Stewart, Santander. are all very  promising.  How does he rate with them? Is he that much more promising? We need pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Hays, Mancini, Mountcastle, Mullins, Stewart, Santander. are all very  promising.  How does he rate with them? Is he that much more promising? We need pitching.

Yes his value is much higher than any of them and outside of maybe Hays, who he still exceeds in value. Brach isn't enough and with them set in the OF and looking to add Manny next year I don't think they'd be interested in any of the aforementioned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

Hays, Mancini, Mountcastle, Mullins, Stewart, Santander. are all very  promising.  How does he rate with them? Is he that much more promising? We need pitching.

Did you miss the part where I said I understand we need pitching?  I even bolded the word “NEEDED”.  My point is a good GM “should” explore any and all trade options if it improves the team.  Would I PREFER they trade for pitching?  Absolutely but would I look into trying to get a highly touted OF prospect if I didn’t have to overpay for him?  Absolutely as well.  My “opinion” (once again I know I have to stress that on this board) is that Frazier is better (or will be better) than any OFer on our roster.  Read up on his scouting report if you have the time.  To suggest however that we shouldn’t look into trading for someone like him simply because we need pitching doesn’t make sense to me.  Hypothetically (and this is VERY hypothetical) if the Astros wanted to trade George Springer to us, should we simply answer the phone and say “Sorry...we’re only interested in trading for a pitcher”?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tryptamine said:

Yes his value is much higher than any of them and outside of maybe Hays, who he still exceeds in value. Brach isn't enough and with them set in the OF and looking to add Manny next year I don't think they'd be interested in any of the aforementioned.

I agree Brach isn’t nearly enough, and that he’s a better prospect than any non-Hays OF Prospect, but is he really more valuable than Hays? 

They are similar players, but Hays is the better defender, and he has a better swing, and better bat control.  Frazier does have the advantage in bat speed by a significant margin, but that hasn’t stopped Hays from superior performance at each minor league stop.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Beef Supreme said:

I just read that Bleier was the fifth best lefty reliever in 2017, so they'd probably trade Frazier for him.

The Yankee bullpen threatens to be historically good.    Anyone who thinks Bleier is the 5th best lefty reliever is kidding themselves.   He had a good ERA in 2017 (1.99).    So did Hart in 2016 (0.49).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, millertime said:

Did you miss the part where I said I understand we need pitching?  I even bolded the word “NEEDED”.  My point is a good GM “should” explore any and all trade options if it improves the team.  Would I PREFER they trade for pitching?  Absolutely but would I look into trying to get a highly touted OF prospect if I didn’t have to overpay for him?  Absolutely as well.  My “opinion” (once again I know I have to stress that on this board) is that Frazier is better (or will be better) than any OFer on our roster.  Read up on his scouting report if you have the time.  To suggest however that we shouldn’t look into trading for someone like him simply because we need pitching doesn’t make sense to me.  Hypothetically (and this is VERY hypothetical) if the Astros wanted to trade George Springer to us, should we simply answer the phone and say “Sorry...we’re only interested in trading for a pitcher”?

I what them to trade for the best player they can get for Manny. It hasn't got to be a pitcher. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would not trade Hays for him, so no I have no interest in a deal for Frazier. We havea whole stable of good looking young outfielders. The guy on the Yankee's that I would like to have is Miguel Andujar. But he isn't coming to Baltimore unless its in a Manny trade. I would trade Manny for Andujar and Chance Adams though. Thats two high ceiling kids and one is a Pitcher.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I agree with this. I just feel like he hasn't been given a fair shot in two seasons up here. I can't see any reason that he can't start 4 games out of 7. Give Hays, Mullins, Santander and Cowser each one day off a week and let him start. 
    • This is probably obvious to many but I have not seen it talked about. With Bradish going on the IL and the recall of reliever Vespi they are now in a 5 man rotation.    Burnes, GRod, Irvin, Suarez and Povich.    And an 8 man pen. It was hoped that Kremer would join the rotation but his short 3 2/3 innings in Sunday's start at Norfolk probably means he gets another start in Norfolk on Friday.    If he does well at that point he could join the O's on June 26th.    Until then the O's are likely to continue with a 5 man rotation IMO.   Even if Kremer joins the rotation in June the O's probably go back to a 5 man rotation in July because of the number of off days in July.
    • Some may feel that way, but I'm wishing that they would have landed them both. Even before the injuries the starting pitching was going to be a little light next season... it's possibly going to be brutal now. Either way, I'm going to enjoy 24 before worrying about next season.
    • That barrel% regression is really surprising. I haven't looked into his repertoire or to see if there is some difference in how he's pitching, but that's a crazy drop off.  I wanted him and was willing to give up Westburg for him before the Burnes trade. I'm glad I'm not the Orioles GM now! lol Saying that, I do think the Orioles may have gotten a bit better out of him. Plus, out of those last seven starts, he's really only pitched poorly twice including the last game where he allowed seven runs to balloon his ERA.  With all the injuries we've head, I still wouldn't be upset with him in the rotation now. But if Suarez can keep it up and start getting through 6 more often, he's basically what we had hoped Cease would have been for us.
    • You've never really been a Stowers guy and have always put a huge emphasis on K-BB ratio. While I agree that K-BB ratio can be important, I believe you had misgivings with Mountcastle as he moved up the chain for the same reason. Stowers is always going to have a lot of miss, but he's not getting much regular playing time and pinch-hitting against relievers is not normally a time to work pitchers so I'm not surprised he's been more aggressive. I still think if Stowers was given 500 PAs he's going to hit 25-30 bombs and put up an OPS north of .780. And I think he's improved his defense enough that I would feel ok with him in LF in Camden Yards.
    • I'm talking about the tone.  It's like they are gleeful that Cease is going through a rough patch.
    • Mullins is a guy that has very little chance of getting an extension or a large contract from anyone. He makes sense as a 4th outfielder type on a team with a right-handed hitting CF, something the Orioles won't have unless Jud Fabian just completely turns it on.  I have to imagine this will be Mullins last year with the Orioles, which should move Cowser into center opening up left field for Stowers next year.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...