Jump to content

Fangraphs Top 20 Oriole Prospects


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/top-20-prospects-baltimore-orioles/

1 Austin Hays 22 R RF 2018 50
2 Chance Sisco 22 R C 2018 50
3 Hunter Harvey 22 A RHP 2018 45
4 D.L. Hall 19 R LHP 2020 45
5 Tanner Scott 22 R LHP 2018 45
6 Cedric Mullins 23 AA CF 2019 45
7 Ryan Mountcastle 21 AA LF 2019 45
8 Cody Sedlock 22 A+ RHP 2019 40
9 Matthias Dietz 22 A RHP 2020 40
10 Zac Lowther 21 A- LHP 2019 40
11 Brenan Hanifee 19 A- RHP 2021 40
12 Anthony Santander 23 R 1B/OF 2018 40
13 Chris Lee 25 AAA LHP 2018 40
14 Luis Gonzalez 26 R LHP 2018 40
15 Lamar Sparks 19 R CF 2022 40
16 D.J. Stewart 24 AA LF 2019 40
17 Gray Fenter 22 A- RHP 2021 40
18 Mike Baumann 22 A RHP 2021 40
19 Keegan Akin 22 A+ LHP 2020 40
20 Jomar Reyes 21 A+ 3B 2020 40

 

All 20 get writeups and they have 14 more names listed below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

I can’t help but think there must be someone in the Orioles organization who calls national prospect evaluators and just yells “CHRIS LEE”!!!

I love seeing where they slot Harvey.  I think it is obvious that if he is healthy he isn't a 45 guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I love seeing where they slot Harvey.  I think it is obvious that if he is healthy he isn't a 45 guy.

Yeah, and other than the loss of developmental time, he doesn’t fit the profile of a guy who’ll have to be a reliever. His command is ok, and should improve, his delivery is clean and easy, I think he’ll have a third viable pitch shortly.

I do think it’s funny/interesting that they write up Yastrzemski over a McKenna or Ring. McKenna and Ring have much better tools than Yastrzemski and McKenna has had some success at an age appropriate level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone else surprised Tanner Scott was an 80 on fastball?  I thought that was reserved for people that are regularly 98+ or 100.  He seemed to sit around 95-97. Granted I haven't seen much of him so maybe that was him on an off day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Sisco has excellent feel for contact, controls the strike zone, can bunt against the shift, and has more raw power than his career numbers indicate, especially now that he’s better incorporated his lower half into his swing.

Well played, Mr. Longenhagen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Hallas said:

Anyone else surprised Tanner Scott was an 80 on fastball?  I thought that was reserved for people that are regularly 98+ or 100.  He seemed to sit around 95-97. Granted I haven't seen much of him so maybe that was him on an off day.

Historically, from what I have read, he has sat at 98-100.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Historically, from what I have read, he has sat at 98-100.

Fair enough.  The O's farm has been dog poop for so long that I've basically ignored everything about it for the past like, 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hallas said:

Anyone else surprised Tanner Scott was an 80 on fastball?  I thought that was reserved for people that are regularly 98+ or 100.  He seemed to sit around 95-97. Granted I haven't seen much of him so maybe that was him on an off day.

Apparently he’s taking some off to throw more strikes, that’s what has been reported and that’s what it looks like. He averaged 97.2 in the AFL, and t100. His average would have been higher too but he had a dead arm the last outing and was lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

When I see these lists and don't see Alex Wells, Keegan Akin is at 19 while Chris Lee is 13 makes me just remember, everyone can have an opinion. 

Yeah, there were definitely some eyebrow raisers on the list.    Aside from where the players were ranked, some of the grades on players’ tools really surprised me.   But, variety of opinion makes things interesting.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

When I see these lists and don't see Alex Wells, Keegan Akin is at 19 while Chris Lee is 13 makes me just remember, everyone can have an opinion. 

Some of which are better than others...

While some make you scratch your head so hard that it bleeds...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Yeah, there were definitely some eyebrow raisers on the list.    Aside from where the players were ranked, some of the grades on players’ tools really surprised me.   But, variety of opinion makes things interesting.   

The Fangraphs guys are very conservative with grades as a rule. That said, I do have some serious disagreements on portions of the list.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...