Jump to content

Take this for what it's worth....


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I'm fine with the seating, I just don't understand how that small a park comes in at around 900M.

Not sure where they expect to get that funding.

Probably because it’s in Florida. Down there it has to the “bells and whistles” that an old fashion ballpark like OPACY doesn’t need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TonySoprano said:

Dan's already taken a flame thrower to the payroll.  Is the payroll dump really a change in organizational philosophy, or a way to make it easier to sell the team, or both?

Both, no doubt in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TonySoprano said:

Dan's already taken a flame thrower to the payroll.  Is the payroll dump really a change in organizational philosophy, or a way to make it easier to sell the team, or both?

I was talking about Brooks and Eddie.

 

As for payroll, It isn't as much lower as I would have taken it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORIOLE33 said:

Probably because it’s in Florida. Down there it has to the “bells and whistles” that an old fashion ballpark like OPACY doesn’t need.

That's Miami, not sure it's Tampa/St Pete.  We are more the early bird special crowd down here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes sense -- doesn't mean it's true, but it's plausible.

I very much doubt MLB owners would approve a move out of Baltimore until after the resolution of stadium issues and possible moves by Tampa Bay and Oakland, and then expansion to 32 teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish we could make the Orioles municipally-owned or association-style ownership like FC Barcelona where you can pay membership dues to get a stake in the organization.  Too bad I'm pretty sure the owners would shoot that down in a heartbeat.  

It'd be pretty awesome to have elections for club president though...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I was talking about Brooks and Eddie.

 

As for payroll, It isn't as much lower as I would have taken it.

O.K. I'll play. If you dump Davis, you're still on the hook for a very large chunk of his salary.  Jones enforced his 10-5 rights.  Trumbo may be an August waiver trade, maybe not.  So other than him, Cobb, and Cashner, all that's left in 2019 is arb and pre-arb guys.   What's your plan?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

What’s wrong with 31K? You know they have trouble drawing down there. Longoria has suggested that they might consider moving.

The demographic in Florida isn't good for Professional Teams. Too many transplants who don't identify with the team and too many retired people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TonySoprano said:

O.K. I'll play. If you dump Davis, you're still on the hook for a very large chunk of his salary.  Jones enforced his 10-5 rights.  Trumbo may be an August waiver trade, maybe not.  So other than him, Cobb, and Cashner, all that's left in 2019 is arb and pre-arb guys.   What's your plan?

I would have tried to move Bundy.  I'd be seeking a buyout with Davis.  Of course try and move Trumbo as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm fine with the seating, I just don't understand how that small a park comes in at around 900M.

Not sure where they expect to get that funding.

You can follow the misadventures of the Trop's replacement on Neil deMause's Field of Schemes website: http://www.fieldofschemes.com/

Here are two recent comments:

  • MLB commissioner Rob Manfred thinks Tampa Bay Rays owner Stuart Sternberg will get a new stadium built, despite not having any idea how to pay for one, thanks to his “creative ability and persuasive ability in terms of getting something done,” while Tampa Bay Times columnist Ernest Hooper says “with ingenuity, solutions can be found” — like how about building school offices into a stadium and selling off school administrative buildings, huh, didja think of that one, smartypants? “There always will be naysayers who dismiss every idea and every project with cynicism,” writes Hooper — hey, it’s the Jim Host Fallacy!
  • Another Tampa Bay Times columnist, Daniel Ruth, had a far more acerbic take on the Rays’ stadium plans, boggling at the $892 million price tag for what would be MLB’s smallest stadium at a time when “public transportation is barely above the level of rickshaws.” Then he closed with the suggestion that Tampa could build “a museum dedicated to the history of architectural renderings of all the stuff that’s never happened,” called “the Field of Schemes Institute of Higher Chutzpah.” Which is a lovely thought and much appreciated, but shouldn’t it really be the Field of Schemes Center for the Study of Vaportecture?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

O.K. I'll play. If you dump Davis, you're still on the hook for a very large chunk of his salary.  Jones enforced his 10-5 rights.  Trumbo may be an August waiver trade, maybe not.  So other than him, Cobb, and Cashner, all that's left in 2019 is arb and pre-arb guys.   What's your plan?

 

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I would have tried to move Bundy.  I'd be seeking a buyout with Davis.  Of course try and move Trumbo as well.

Jones is done in two months.  Trumbo might be playing himself into an August waiver deal, if not he'll likely be moved next year.  Cashner is in the same boat.  I pray Davis is off this team soon, one way or the other.  Cobb isn't moveable, but could be next year if he's having a good season.  That's it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Hopefully, if they have to trade Gunnar it's with a year and a half of control instead of a rental to maximize the return.
    • Gunnar would be the main one at this point. It's going to take the Witt contract plus, but he's the kind of player that you can build around on a 10 year deal.   There's a plenty of other options but I'd rather start with him. If he's not interested then you move on...all depending on what ownership will go for as well.
    • Just look at the Braves. Stuck with all those players and in 2nd place.
    • In a traditional/historical sense, Gunnar would more likely reside in the 3, 4 or 5 spots in the lineup. But this new-age baseball that we have seen evolve over the last few years does seem to place more of a priority on getting your best hitters the most ABs. As others have mentioned, look at Soto in his career, look at Ohtani, etc. But what hasn't been mentioned (that I've seen, maybe I missed it) is that this new era of baseball also shows us that a sub .200 hitter can be successful in the leadoff spot when they mash like Schwarber does for the Phils. I think it's just as likely that Hyder keeps penciling in Gunnar in the top spot because Gunnar feels comfortable there but also because of his ability to set the table for the rest of the lineup to start the game. That is really what the leadoff guy's job is to do. He's lead off with a homer what, five times this year? That's five games where the O's were on the board just one batter into their turn to hit. For a younger lineup like the O's have now, I think it's extremely important that they use whatever advantage they think they have as early in the game as possible. We've seen them struggle to score runs early in a lot of the games this year. They don't ever seem to lay down but battling from behind is not the ideal position to be, especially at the frequency that has been so far this year. I suspect that increased pressure may eventually catch up with them. So, yeah, if Gunnar is their best power hitter but also gives the team the best opportunity to score early, I'm fine with him hitting first in the order even if it means fewer guys on base when he's at the plate.   
    • Hell my Golden Retriever could call a better game than last night. Trouble is, you'd have a lot of spit balls! 
    • I think Kyle Gibson has it right: The more I hear about the robot umps, the less I like the idea but I think technology should be used and replay would be good.  Should be very easy and very fast…ala tennis.
    • There is something to what Roy says. Overall in MLB this year: vs a starter 1st time through the order, all MLB teams OPS .694 vs a starter 2nd time through the order, all MLB teams OPS .694 vs a starter 3rd time through the order, all MLB teams OPS .755 [4th time and beyond, only 114 plate appearances in all of MLB this year:  .725] So it is expected that you will do your best work the 3rd time through the order vs a starter, and will be a bit worse off the first time through. The Orioles on the season (keep in mind we are a way better than average offense so our overall #s should in general be better than the MLB average): 1st time:  .658 OPS  2nd time:  .817 OPS 3rd time:  .816 OPS 4th+ (7 plate appearances): 1.572 OPS So we are a very slow starting team, so far this year.   We have a well above average offense that is actually significantly below average the first time through the order vs a starter. I don't know why this is... but so far it has been the case.   I'll not that before the Seattle series the numbers were even more extreme, we OPSed just .615 1TTTO when I looked it up last week.   Maybe with time this will even out, but the point is, Roy isn't imagining things.   At the start of the game, we are a below average MLB offense this year and as the game progresses we get way above average.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...