Jump to content

Promising Starter Prospects Bring Hope for the Future


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, WarehouseChatter said:

It’s all about development as they move throughout the system - something we’ve sadly not been able to  over the last ump-teen years.  With new leadership, I hope this changes.  

Your comment leaves us on the horns of a dilemma. If new management is bringing in increased awareness and competence and procedures in coaching, then how do we explain the fact that Bundy has made no consistent improvement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Luke-OH said:

I talk about a bunch of these guys in this podcast with Adam Pohl.

 

Anyone else having trouble listening to the interview with Luke?  I am able to listen to the interviews with Bannon and Erwin but I only get the intro music on the interview with Luke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

Your comment leaves us on the horns of a dilemma. If new management is bringing in increased awareness and competence and procedures in coaching, then how do we explain the fact that Bundy has made no consistent improvement?

Don’t take this the wrong way, but here’s a few reasons.

1. His velocity is steadily declining, HR allowed on FB has negative relationship with velocity. Faster the pitch, lower the HR rate, slower = higher.

2. It’s not magic, even the best player development or coaching can’t fix everyone

3. Change is hard, especially for someone who has been doing things the same way.

4. It doesn’t happen overnight

The thing with Bundy is without the fastball, which doesn’t play at 89-92, he has to pitch backwards and doesn’t have enough consistent feel for the secondaries to do that regularly (sometimes it works, like his last start). I think his best path forward is in the offseason go to Tread or Driveline or RPP and just work on getting the velocity back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prospects are always interesting....and, over the  years, we have seen up and down cycles of enthusiasm for our pitching prospects.    For me,  I will wait patiently up here at Camden Yards and when and if somebody actually does it....actually pitches well as a top notch starter for us sometime down the road, I will allow myself to be pleasantly surprised.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Luke-OH said:

Don’t take this the wrong way, but here’s a few reasons.

1. His velocity is steadily declining, HR allowed on FB has negative relationship with velocity. Faster the pitch, lower the HR rate, slower = higher.

2. It’s not magic, even the best player development or coaching can’t fix everyone

3. Change is hard, especially for someone who has been doing things the same way.

4. It doesn’t happen overnight

The thing with Bundy is without the fastball, which doesn’t play at 89-92, he has to pitch backwards and doesn’t have enough consistent feel for the secondaries to do that regularly (sometimes it works, like his last start). I think his best path forward is in the offseason go to Tread or Driveline or RPP and just work on getting the velocity back.

Why would I take that the wrong way? I’m very happy to have an in-depth answer from you at any time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do believe that the new approach in analytics will take some time as they need to first get a baseline,  analyze said baseline, approach player to change, have the changes implemented, adjust the changes to the changed baseline, repeat.

It;s not like changing spark plugs in a car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Luke-OH said:

Don’t take this the wrong way, but here’s a few reasons.

1. His velocity is steadily declining, HR allowed on FB has negative relationship with velocity. Faster the pitch, lower the HR rate, slower = higher.

2. It’s not magic, even the best player development or coaching can’t fix everyone

3. Change is hard, especially for someone who has been doing things the same way.

4. It doesn’t happen overnight

The thing with Bundy is without the fastball, which doesn’t play at 89-92, he has to pitch backwards and doesn’t have enough consistent feel for the secondaries to do that regularly (sometimes it works, like his last start). I think his best path forward is in the offseason go to Tread or Driveline or RPP and just work on getting the velocity back.

I agree...although I doubt he will be able to regain velocity....although I could see him perhaps following a Scott McGregor path as I believe Dylan has a very high pitching acumen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

I agree...although I doubt he will be able to regain velocity....although I could see him perhaps following a Scott McGregor path as I believe Dylan has a very high pitching acumen. 

Scott McGregor wouldn't sniff the majors in today's game.  The enoucaraging thing about Bundy is he can still strike some guys out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Hunter Harvey should not be on any prospect list. 6.23 ERA in Bowie and always waiting for the other shoe to drop when it comes to Harvey’s health. 

Anything he contributes at MLB level is a bonus. 

I had taken him off, but changed my mind. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Its a real shame. We knew there we were probably on borrowed time with Means and unfortunately, it appears he did not hold up. This reminds my of the Matt Riley situation. He came back, was never fully right, then blew it back out and needed a second surgery. Came back and was never even close to the guy before both surgeries. And that was at a younger age than Means. I hope he can maybe undergo some PRP treatments and maybe come back by the last two months of the season and still help out, but I think anything we get from him from here on out is gravy. Saying that, I'm ok going forward with a Burnes, Bradish, GRodriguez, Kremer, Irvin rotation.  Povich obviously could also be in the mix, but I think they will go back to a 5-man rotation and bring up Heasley unless they want to keep working on stretching him out as a starter. That would mean Dillon Tate would probably be coming back for mop up/low leverage work.  
    • I don't know if the Orioles would go through with this plan, but Mullins is badly in need of a reset. This is his stat line since July 1st last season through yesterday. In 360 plate appearances Mullins is batting .199/.246/.360 with a 67 wRC+. https://www.fangraphs.com/players/cedric-mullins-ii/17929/game-log?position=OF&gds=2023-07-01&gde=2024-05-22&season=
    • Hal to the NY Post, as reported on MLB Now this afternoon: "I'm gonna be honest, payrolls at the levels we're at right now are simply not sustainable for us financially...   We've got a considerable amount of money coming off* next offseason...  We didn't have a considerable amount of money coming off last offseason, which is why we're at where we're at." *Clay Holmes and Gleyber Torres, as well as the big fish This year's division race will be thrilling, but I do think there's a chance this is the best Yankees team in awhile, while we're still experimenting with if we don't experience any asset loss deploying veterans instead of some of the world's strongest young players.
    • Honestly with Hays, Mullins, Santander, and Mountcastle all struggling, it's a window where Stowers should be starting near daily. 
    • They also ground out to second and first a ton.  Almost every Gunnar out that isn't a K seems like a ground out to second or first.  BTW I was looking Gunnar's Savant page and interestingly he would have only 8 homers at Fenway (not related, just interesting).  
    • He was serious, and don't call him Shirley! This works a lot better verbally!  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...