Jump to content

Connolly: Hobgood and Jordan


weams

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, weams said:

Narrator: "He burned through his entire bonus with nothing to show for it..."

Quote

And as for that money, that $2.4 million bonus?

He wishes he had been smarter with it. He’s generous by nature, so when he was flush with cash, he spread it around maybe a little too liberally. He bought expensive clothes and dinners, simply because he thought there would be so much more coming when he made the majors. He also didn’t invest it as wisely as he would have liked, in retrospect. He didn’t buy a home, for instance, until 2016.

He said he still has a chunk of the signing bonus remaining. He lives in a nice house in Surprise and has a low monthly payment. It’s only been in the past year that he’s been working full time.

“I’m not in a position where I can just kind of coast,” he said. “The reality of that is if it would have been managed better, spent better, yeah, that money could have been doubled, tripled.”

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

atomic's argument that he's made previously is that everyone is immature and stupid and will blow through their multi-$million bonus in 15 minutes, so they should always forgo the bonus and go to college.

But in a less cynical world a player could set aside a small fraction of his bonus as insurance against injury or poor performance and go back to school if the need arises.  If you skip out on the $millions up front there's a good chance it never comes back, and you can lose your scholarship from injury or poor performance.

I know people who have a college degree but I would not trust them balancing a checkbook. Figuring out how much change they get back from Starbucks is a trying ordeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

But he got $2.42M.  If he'd gone to college the most likely outcome is that he was still hurt, pitches poorly, loses his scholarship in a year or two, and has to come up with the money to finish school AND he's out $2.42M. 

The only scenario where college was the logical choice for Matt Hobgood was one where he was magically not hurt and you assume he's always going to burn through his entire bonus with nothing to show for it.

The players who skip college to go for the instant gratification of a signing bonus at age 18 are probably the ones that are most likely to go through their signing bonus on frivolous things. Also I am sure the tax rate on a one time payment like a signing bonus is quite high plus agents probably get a cut.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, atomic said:

The players who skip college to go for the instant gratification of a signing bonus at age 18 are probably the ones that are most likely to go through their signing bonus on frivolous things. Also I am sure the tax rate on a one time payment like a signing bonus is quite high plus agents probably get a cut.  

According to the article Hobgood now has a nice house, and a portion of the bonus still in the bank that he could use for college.  Things he would not have if he'd gone to college, stayed hurt, lost his scholarship and never been drafted.  Which is the most likely outcome of following your advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

According to the article Hobgood now has a nice house, and a portion of the bonus still in the bank that he could use for college.  Things he would not have if he'd gone to college, stayed hurt, lost his scholarship and never been drafted.  Which is the most likely outcome of following your advice.

I agree with you in principle but how often to people lose a scholarship? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, survivedc said:

I agree with you in principle but how often to people lose a scholarship? 

I really don't know.  But NCAA baseball teams only get 11.7 scholarships per team. Most of the players on the team are paying their own way or on partial scholarship.  Are they really going to give out a full scholarship for four years to a guy who can't pitch because he's hurt?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we stop the nonsense that Christian kids aren't likely to use steroids. It's balderdash. I really like The Athletic and I reread it, but there's an undertone, maybe from Jordan or Connolly (or both) that because he was a straight edge Christian kid, they didn't think he was capable of such. Bullcrap.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookitsPuck said:

Can we stop the nonsense that Christian kids aren't likely to use steroids. It's balderdash. I really like The Athletic and I reread it, but there's an undertone, maybe from Jordan or Connolly (or both) that because he was a straight edge Christian kid, they didn't think he was capable of such. Bullcrap.

I think many of the ones who have been caught are forward with their faith in the media.  I know several of the Orioles who used were FCA or evangelical. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A chunk of guys who sign to play baseball out of high school don't want to go to college. Some take the community college route to try to improve draft position or get drafted because they don't wan't to deal with college. College isn't for everybody and there's nothing wrong with that. A lot of football and basketball players declare early for the draft even when they have a long shot to make it for the same reason. College is misery for some. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I really don't know.  But NCAA baseball teams only get 11.7 scholarships per team. Most of the players on the team are paying their own way or on partial scholarship.  Are they really going to give out a full scholarship for four years to a guy who can't pitch because he's hurt?

This is beyond stupid.

NCAA rules for mens basketball, the team can have to 13 scholarships and while there is no max roster limit, I thought most teams average 15 players for a starting lineup requirement of 5.

So baseball has 27 players, and get 11.7 scholarships and a starting lineup of 10.

Beyond crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I dont think it matters in the playoffs. You need a little bit of luck in a 5 or a 3 game series.
    • I don't think most of the issues with Rays attendance and engagement is because of the roster churn. It's because of the stadium, the competition from the Lightning and Bucs for entertainment dollars and the transient fanbase mostly having allegiances to other teams. 
    • Would you rather have Atlanta's roster or Texas?
    • It's been said many times already but the Rangers won with pitchers NO ONE would have said were much better than Cole Irvin last year. In addition, Atlanta lost in the NLDS despite having maybe one of the best rosters ever assembled. As for ownership,  as stated all evidence is Elias is not going chips all in on one season as much as you may want him to. Rubenstein has said hes taking a hands off approach especially in this first season as has totally faith in the front office.  Unless you want a repeat of the Duquette years, going all in, prospects be damned, is a strategy from a bygone era.
    • Is Justin Verlander toast?     Maybe the future resembles the past. In Bradish's presumed absence, he's an interesting possible character as one of the three lead SP. I do believe the Astros staggered his start this year knowing at his age 26 weeks + October is too heavy a lift.    He's presently sidelined with a sore neck after getting scratched a couple days ago (and the Astros getting routed when they had to accelerate a kiddo).  Last October he had two good games and one bad game against MIN and TEX. Astros this week have a cold/hot mix with the White Sox before us this weekend, when we might get a live look.
    • IMO because all big contracts come with various degrees of risk. The wisest course is to spend on the best/most talented player. They are the ones who most likely have the longest run of great to good in them, even if they cost the most. What you don't want to do is spend money on guys who fall off of cliffs early or are injury prone or who do not have the mentality to handle success or who do not have very strong work habits and will likely become comfortable after getting paid. That is why I think (like many others) that Gunnar is the guy you want to extend even if you have to move heaven and earth to do so. I just don't see anything in his profile/short history that are any kind of "red flags". It is likely to be worth it (at least for a long time - at least next decade). Also taking into account the momentum that the O's are riding with winning, so many young homegrown stars, and new ownership. IF they were to extend a Henderson and/or Rustchman IMO it will take the org to a new level and provide even greater momentum and fan interest/marketplace growth. That is how you become the next "big player/franchise" that can sustain winning beyond a short/6 yr team control window. I've stated before that I worry that a Rays model of ongoing rebuilding, never spending meaningfully, and never being invested enough as an org to be fully committed to winning sends the wrong message to your customer/fanbase and will never really engage a community/marketplace fully. 
    • I doubt they give him a 2-3 year deal, I do think if he's here it's because they give a QO and he takes it, which I also doubt he'd do, because someone is going to pay him more for longer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...