Jump to content

Tigers sign Schoop to a 1-year $6.1M contract


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Scalious said:

What would be a better path of spending 10M?

Max out international spending.  Max out draft spending.  Infrastructure.  Scouts.  Analytics tools and personnel.  Or put most of it in a low-risk investment, ready to be spent in 2023 when they're in the part of the competitive window where it might matter.  What are they going to be likely to get for a few months of a 2-win second baseman?  Hint: Some team's #22 prospect, for about $3M.  Schoop is coming off two years worse than Jonathan Villar, and the O's got almost nothing for him. 

Spending for a few wins coming off a 47-win season is essentially setting the money on fire so their version of @atomic won't complain so much.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Max out international spending.  Max out draft spending.  Infrastructure.  Scouts.  Analytics tools and personnel.  Or put most of it in a low-risk investment, ready to be spent in 2023 when they're in the part of the competitive window where it might matter.  What are they going to be likely to get for a few months of a 2-win second baseman?  Hint: Some team's #22 prospect, for about $3M.  Schoop is coming off two years worse than Jonathan Villar, and the O's got almost nothing for him. 

Spending for a few wins coming off a 47-win season is essentially setting the money on fire so their version of @atomic won't complain so much.

I think that’s too harsh.    For all we know they’re already spending amply in all those other areas.    Their payroll looks to be down considerably from 2019 even with these acquisitions.  If they feel they can spend a bit on 2020 payroll without jeopardizing current spending in other areas or future payroll spending, I don’t have a problem with it.    I do agree that Schoop isn’t likely to bring much back at the deadline.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Max out international spending.  Max out draft spending.  Infrastructure.  Scouts.  Analytics tools and personnel.  Or put most of it in a low-risk investment, ready to be spent in 2023 when they're in the part of the competitive window where it might matter.  What are they going to be likely to get for a few months of a 2-win second baseman?  Hint: Some team's #22 prospect, for about $3M.  Schoop is coming off two years worse than Jonathan Villar, and the O's got almost nothing for him. 

Spending for a few wins coming off a 47-win season is essentially setting the money on fire so their version of @atomic won't complain so much.

There are hard caps for IFA spending. I don't think these deals have anything to do with how much they are willing to spend on IFAs. You can't go ham like the Padres and Yankees did years ago.

That and the IFA market is a pre-determined market. They are making these deals with kids years well before they turn 16. That is why its going to take a few years until the Orioles start to bring in big IFA names.

As for infrastructure. I'd agree, but avlia is an established GM. He's probably already made the major changes he wanted to. Also back to the point that these teams are likely given yearly budgets. So its spend it now, not later. At the end of the day we are both making a lot of assumptions. We dont know what the books look like.

Edited by Scalious
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

What's your definition of competent?  The Jays are spending money to finish in 4th place.  

The Jays just had Vlad Guerrero Jr, Bo Bichette, and Cavan Biggio all arrive in the majors last year. They already had Gurriel Jr - and Danny Jansen should get better.

They have a top arm in Nate Pearson ready to arrive in 2020. They just signed Ryu, Roark, and Chase Anderson - which could be a sneaky good rotation.

They play in a city with almost 3 million people. Why shouldn't they spend money? The time is now for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think that’s too harsh.    For all we know they’re already spending amply in all those other areas.    Their payroll looks to be down considerably from 2019 even with these acquisitions.  If they feel they can spend a bit on 2020 payroll without jeopardizing current spending in other areas or future payroll spending, I don’t have a problem with it.    I do agree that Schoop isn’t likely to bring much back at the deadline.   

Maybe it is too harsh. But it's similar to what the 2007 Orioles would have done.  It's burning $6M on a guy who won't be there in a year, who will not even remotely put them in contention, and will probably bring back little at the deadline.  I guess a more charitable take is that they're rolling the dice that he'll repeat 2017 and bring back a halfway decent prospect for their money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

That is a crazy overpay for Schoop.

If they were going to waste 6 million dollars, Adam Jones may have been a better value.

Schoop is an average MLB hitter, he's an average fielding second baseman, and he's 27.

Jones is a below-average hitter, he's a below-average fielding RFer, and he's 33.

How is Jones a better value?  His sage advice to the youths?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

I think that’s too harsh.    For all we know they’re already spending amply in all those other areas.    Their payroll looks to be down considerably from 2019 even with these acquisitions.  If they feel they can spend a bit on 2020 payroll without jeopardizing current spending in other areas or future payroll spending, I don’t have a problem with it.    I do agree that Schoop isn’t likely to bring much back at the deadline.   

Looks like they are. Not sure how many people the Orioles have in total in the analytics department?

The Tigers' player payroll is expected to stay much the same going into next season, enough to make some signings on a budget but not a major splash. Their major investment continues to be in analytics.

What was a one-man analytics department when Al Avila took over as general manager was up to 14 members this year. It’ll grow beyond that this winter as the Tigers look to add analytics brain power to their farm system.

“We’re adding more analytics. We’re adding more people,” manager Ron Gardenhire said. “We’re going out in search of college people that have really set the table and the groundwork for all this stuff, that know what they’re doing. As we speak, our guys are out there looking for people that are more involved in this.

 

https://www.mlb.com/news/tigers-to-spend-on-analytics-again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Going Underground said:

Looks like they are. Not sure how many people the Orioles have in total in the analytics department?

The Tigers' player payroll is expected to stay much the same going into next season, enough to make some signings on a budget but not a major splash. Their major investment continues to be in analytics.

What was a one-man analytics department when Al Avila took over as general manager was up to 14 members this year. It’ll grow beyond that this winter as the Tigers look to add analytics brain power to their farm system.

“We’re adding more analytics. We’re adding more people,” manager Ron Gardenhire said. “We’re going out in search of college people that have really set the table and the groundwork for all this stuff, that know what they’re doing. As we speak, our guys are out there looking for people that are more involved in this.

 

https://www.mlb.com/news/tigers-to-spend-on-analytics-again

I think it was weams who suggested Avila was not an analytics guy.    That may not be his personal strength, but he seems to recognize its importance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I picture Scherzer as purely a salary dump for Texas. They are up against it in terms of Luxury tax. I also see Scherzer as a start to start pitcher in terms of durability. Not willing to give up more than a AAAA guy and a lottery ticket prospect. 
    • Meh.  Is it riskier to invest 1) in a phase 1 or phase 2 pharmaceutical or 2) when as the FDA is meeting for final approval?
    • I think of an elite athlete as something different entirely.  And I think that’s Frobby’s point.     I think of an elite athlete as someone that can easily & efficiently use their body to achieve an end goal.  Being able to manipulate their body and other implements to accomplish a specific task.  Be able to repeat that skill and adapt easily to changes in the environment.  Someone that has incredible balance, space awareness, timing, and hand eye coordination.  Someone who would thrive when thrown in any athletic environment they are put in.     To me it has nothing to do with speed, strength, or ability to jump. However, someone that is fast, jumps high, and is strong and who also can control their body et al would be the 1% elite elite.  IE. Gunnar (if you’ve seen him play other sports, he does it easily).   If I had to guess Mateo probably can’t shoot a basketball and would be a terrible ping pong player.  Just a guess watching him hit.     Not arguing or saying you are wrong, just how I define it. 
    • Who underrates Rooker? He's been mentioned in a bunch of trades. It's hard to underrate a guy averaging 141 OPS+ and an .849 OPS over the only two full seasons he's played. Oh, and the 30 HRs a year. 
    • I don't think he's going to be a star, but I think he will be a good player.  I wouldn't trade him now because I like his ability to play CF.    I would, however, not object to trading him in the right deal.  I don't think Crochet is that deal.   
    • This trade idea makes absolutely no sense unless you have the White Sox throw in Robert as well (and he won't be a throw-in, we'd have to up our package for him.)  Cowser's essentially been a full time starter and despite his bad May and mediocre June he's been an above average player for us overall.  The only way I'd consider giving up Cowser here is if they throw in Robert.  We'd probably have to package Cowser with someone better - instead of Norby we'd be looking at giving up Kjerstad or someone like that - if we wanted the WS to throw in Robert.   On top of that, Crochet is going to be of limited help this year.  We could save him for the playoffs, but that carries its own risks as well.  It's ok to look to the future, but we need to be maximizing the 2024 team's chance to win in the playoffs.  Trading a starting outfielder who's been well above average to date doesn't really do that.  Even if you assume the June version is more like his true talent level offensively, he's still likely to produce 1 to 1.5 WAR for the rest of the season just on the strength of his defense.  I'm not sure we get that from a limited Crochet + Cowser's backfill.
    • The timing matters here.  In the offseason we didn't know Cowser would become what he has defensively now, including being able to more than adequately handle CF.  Nor did we know Mullins was going to crater offensively to the extent he has. If you do this trade now, you are creating a hole in CF while only arguably upgrading the pitching for the rest of the season given Crochet's innings limitations.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...