Jump to content

The Astros and Red Sox Punishments


weams

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Philip said:

No.

He will be under much greater scrutiny, of course, but he’s aware of that and will be treading the straight and narrow path for the foreseeable future.

There’s no warned like forewarned

How will he be under more scrutiny than the Yankees and Blue Jays who we already warned/undersuspcion of technical violations? I mean the Yankees used the Apple watches. Toronto had a dedicated real time video room in the hotel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

No.

He will be under much greater scrutiny, of course, but he’s aware of that and will be treading the straight and narrow path for the foreseeable future.

There’s no warned like forewarned

I don't really see anyone in Baltimore under any scrutiny, outside of the OH, some other websites, blogs and diehard twitter users.  Let's be real here, what's happening on Baltimore isn't on any national reporters radar, it's not even close.  When you're as bad as we are, no one cares.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I don't really see anyone in Baltimore under any scrutiny, outside of the OH, some other websites, blogs and diehard twitter users.  Let's be real here, what's happening on Baltimore isn't on any national reporters radar, it's not even close.  When you're as bad as we are, no one cares.  

Well, Ken. If Ken sniffs a seafood odor he's on it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Ken and I will be dining at Sotto Sopra on Thursday evening if you'd like to join.  I'd invite @TonySoprano but he's stood us up so many times that his standing offer to join has been rescinded.

We will probably be on the road to beat the storm by Thursday.  I already switched mail. So maybe next time. My best to him. Make sure you slouch and don't wear heels. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TheOtherRipken said:

Our competitive balance round and 2nd round pick are starting to look nicer and nicer, not only are they going to happen sooner, but the Astros and presumably the Red Sox are going to not pick before us now.  Here is praying we don’t screw this up.

Yep, I was thinking the same thing.  Every little bit helps/.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I don't really see anyone in Baltimore under any scrutiny, outside of the OH, some other websites, blogs and diehard twitter users.  Let's be real here, what's happening on Baltimore isn't on any national reporters radar, it's not even close.  When you're as bad as we are, no one cares.  

You can't go on a witch hunt and charge every team.  You severely punish the Astros and Red Soxs as a deterrent to other teams.   The penalties are more of a way of stopping this in the tracks now instead of trying to find everyone involved. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For all of the cheating that goes on in baseball, this punishment seems unbelievably harsh.  The folks who came up with and implemented the scheme get away scot-free while the unaware GM gets fired because he is the guy at the top.  The lost draft picks have enormous value.  

That said, I do believe that any baseball cheating that does not involve the 25 man MLB roster and the coaches (anything that is not old fashion sign stealing) should involve a punishment.  Any cheating that occurs with a camera on the catcher or the base coaches should be punishable IMO.

I would like to see MLB have the owner, GM and coach of each organization sign a statement that they are unaware and have not participated in any cheating scheme of any sort.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, weams said:

How will he be under more scrutiny than the Yankees and Blue Jays who we already warned/undersuspcion of technical violations? I mean the Yankees used the Apple watches. Toronto had a dedicated real time video room in the hotel. 

He wont do it, but he also won’t attempt to do it. Toronto and New York will do what they do. Regarding @Moose Milligan‘S Comment, nobody’s going to pay intention to us unless there is reason to do so, but when there is reason to do so, we don’t want them to look deep and find something, so I’m pretty sure that Mike will make sure there will be nothing to find.

And of course people are going to pay attention to us, because Mike just came from that environment, and people are going to quite reasonably say, “is Mike going to do the same thing that Luhnow did?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Philip said:

He wont do it, but he also won’t attempt to do it. Toronto and New York will do what they do. Regarding @Moose Milligan‘S Comment, nobody’s going to pay intention to us unless there is reason to do so, but when there is reason to do so, we don’t want them to look deep and find something, so I’m pretty sure that Mike will make sure there will be nothing to find.

And of course people are going to pay attention to us, because Mike just came from that environment, and people are going to quite reasonably say, “is Mike going to do the same thing that Luhnow did?”

Na. It's pretty much a League issue. If I were the Nats I'd be looking over my shoulder. They hit some real good pitches. In several series. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I picture Scherzer as purely a salary dump for Texas. They are up against it in terms of Luxury tax. I also see Scherzer as a start to start pitcher in terms of durability. Not willing to give up more than a AAAA guy and a lottery ticket prospect. 
    • Meh.  Is it riskier to invest 1) in a phase 1 or phase 2 pharmaceutical or 2) when as the FDA is meeting for final approval?
    • I think of an elite athlete as something different entirely.  And I think that’s Frobby’s point.     I think of an elite athlete as someone that can easily & efficiently use their body to achieve an end goal.  Being able to manipulate their body and other implements to accomplish a specific task.  Be able to repeat that skill and adapt easily to changes in the environment.  Someone that has incredible balance, space awareness, timing, and hand eye coordination.  Someone who would thrive when thrown in any athletic environment they are put in.     To me it has nothing to do with speed, strength, or ability to jump. However, someone that is fast, jumps high, and is strong and who also can control their body et al would be the 1% elite elite.  IE. Gunnar (if you’ve seen him play other sports, he does it easily).   If I had to guess Mateo probably can’t shoot a basketball and would be a terrible ping pong player.  Just a guess watching him hit.     Not arguing or saying you are wrong, just how I define it. 
    • Who underrates Rooker? He's been mentioned in a bunch of trades. It's hard to underrate a guy averaging 141 OPS+ and an .849 OPS over the only two full seasons he's played. Oh, and the 30 HRs a year. 
    • I don't think he's going to be a star, but I think he will be a good player.  I wouldn't trade him now because I like his ability to play CF.    I would, however, not object to trading him in the right deal.  I don't think Crochet is that deal.   
    • This trade idea makes absolutely no sense unless you have the White Sox throw in Robert as well (and he won't be a throw-in, we'd have to up our package for him.)  Cowser's essentially been a full time starter and despite his bad May and mediocre June he's been an above average player for us overall.  The only way I'd consider giving up Cowser here is if they throw in Robert.  We'd probably have to package Cowser with someone better - instead of Norby we'd be looking at giving up Kjerstad or someone like that - if we wanted the WS to throw in Robert.   On top of that, Crochet is going to be of limited help this year.  We could save him for the playoffs, but that carries its own risks as well.  It's ok to look to the future, but we need to be maximizing the 2024 team's chance to win in the playoffs.  Trading a starting outfielder who's been well above average to date doesn't really do that.  Even if you assume the June version is more like his true talent level offensively, he's still likely to produce 1 to 1.5 WAR for the rest of the season just on the strength of his defense.  I'm not sure we get that from a limited Crochet + Cowser's backfill.
    • The timing matters here.  In the offseason we didn't know Cowser would become what he has defensively now, including being able to more than adequately handle CF.  Nor did we know Mullins was going to crater offensively to the extent he has. If you do this trade now, you are creating a hole in CF while only arguably upgrading the pitching for the rest of the season given Crochet's innings limitations.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...