Jump to content

Poll: Grading Elias' Tenure Thus Far


Greg Pappas

How would you grade Elias' tenure thus far?  

127 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you grade Elias' tenure thus far?



Recommended Posts

Let's look back in O's history. They have had some very good Baseball Exec's that could never get anything done thanks to the Owner. Correct? If a new guy, Elias, comes in he knows this. They say he has total control and there is money to cover everything.That's what was said at the press conference. Well, the MASN issue, money, hasn't been solved. The Davis issue, money, hasn't been solved. The way they have handled Marketing has been terrible. So you can believe what you want but it looks like the same crap to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

Let's look back in O's history. They have had some very good Baseball Exec's that could never get anything done thanks to the Owner. Correct? If a new guy, Elias, comes in he knows this. They say he has total control and there is money to cover everything.That's what was said at the press conference. Well, the MASN issue, money, hasn't been solved. The Davis issue, money, hasn't been solved. The way they have handled Marketing has been terrible. So you can believe what you want but it looks like the same crap to me.

There are very clear differences than before.  Most notably, that in 1998-2011 and even after that they never actually rebuilt.  They never started to rebuild.  The closest they came was trading Erik Bedard.  Today they're clearly tearing it down with the intent of changing their fundamental philosophy and rebuilding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

The more I think about it they all get an F. From Ownership down. 

What would've garnered an A in your book? The previous regime left the O's in as bad a condition you could possibly leave it. It's bizarre to me that he doesn't even get a C for building up an analytics department from basically nothing as well as an actually functionally international scouting presence. These are things that even the bad franchises had and the Os did not.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Satyr3206 said:

Let's look back in O's history. They have had some very good Baseball Exec's that could never get anything done thanks to the Owner. Correct? If a new guy, Elias, comes in he knows this. They say he has total control and there is money to cover everything.That's what was said at the press conference. Well, the MASN issue, money, hasn't been solved. The Davis issue, money, hasn't been solved. The way they have handled Marketing has been terrible. So you can believe what you want but it looks like the same crap to me.

You're basing your grade of Elias in part on "the MASN issue"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2020 at 9:39 AM, DrungoHazewood said:

There are very clear differences than before.  Most notably, that in 1998-2011 and even after that they never actually rebuilt.  They never started to rebuild.  The closest they came was trading Erik Bedard.  Today they're clearly tearing it down with the intent of changing their fundamental philosophy and rebuilding. 

On the drafting and player side I might agree. On the Ownership and business side I totally disagree. If you want to move a Franchise forward you have to address all issues. There are numerous things with the Orioles that haven't been addressed. The common denominator is the Owners. If you want to run a ML Team then ask the hard questions and get authority to deal with the problems.Elias should have asked these questions and gotten authority to handle them.  With the Orioles no one ever gets this authority and things drag out for years and years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2020 at 9:43 AM, LTO's said:

What would've garnered an A in your book? The previous regime left the O's in as bad a condition you could possibly leave it. It's bizarre to me that he doesn't even get a C for building up an analytics department from basically nothing as well as an actually functionally international scouting presence. These are things that even the bad franchises had and the Os did not.

In my life the Hoffberger/ Cashen team. The Atlanta Braves during the 90's. Hank Peters was a good GM hamstrung by Ownership.Oh and btw Analytics are nothing but stats. You can not build a Franchise based solely on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

In my life the Hoffberger/ Cashen team. The Atlanta Braves during the 90's. Hank Peters was a good GM hamstrung by Ownership.Oh and btw Analytics are nothing but stats. You can not build a Franchise based solely on that.

I forgot Branch Rickey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What if the Governor or President does a poor job handling the hurricane?  Should we just shrug it off?

What exactly should Elias be doing to handle the MASN situation?  Should he be taking night school law classes to go inject himself into the legal process?  Should he be going on undercover missions to DC to try to get the Nats to give up their case?  This is an issue that has nothing to do with Elias' area of responsibility.  If it turns out in the O's favor and you give him a gold star for it, you're giving gold stars to the rooster for making the sun come up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That's like giving the President or the Governor a poor grade because a hurricane happened.

Actually, a more apt comparison would be failing the Mayor or Governor for funding, planning and building a white elephant convention center and architecturally deficient hotel which actually permanently detract from “the ballpark that forever changed baseball”.

Plus the MASN litigation is not in the GM’s realm, it’s not like he can come in and say “I know a better team of lawyers to handle this, let me get rid of yours”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Cowser has had a lot of HH contact and nothing to show in recent weeks - still, the production has been down now for a bit and would be nice to see some results.  Though the extended scuffles of Hayes and Mullins still make him a pretty clear regular at the moment imho.
    • Yep, haven't been following the Rays closely this year, could not believe Randy's stats when MASN put them on the screen last night. Unpredictable game, that's for sure
    • I'm glad to see Westburg back in the lineup. I should've gotten off of my butt and drove up to the game today.
    • Hopefully, these guys have a better June than they did in May. Cowser .580 OPS O'Hearn .653 OPS
    • Because "potential" tends to be more indicative of future results than a small, recent sample of success.
    • I don't get why everyone on here is in love with "potential" instead of "results." I remember last year when Means was rehabbing in the minors this board was saying he'd maybe be a bullpen piece. I was thinking, "Do these people not remember 'John Means day'? The guy knows how to pitch and gets results. I trust him WAY more than Grayson. Sadly Means got hurt and didn't get a chance to pitch in the playoffs. When the playoffs roll around in 2024, if Suarez still has a 1.57 ERA and .99 WHIP, I'm giving him the damn ball way before I give to a guy with a 3.53 ERA and 1.33 WHIP who has a career 27 ERA In the post-season.  Don't misunderstand me, Grayson has a TON of potential but he's reminding me a lot of Kevin Gausman at this point in his career - a guy who repeatedly got our hopes up as being a dominant TOR guy but never was for us. Suarez has a 1.2 WAR this year in 34 innings. Grayson has a 0.5 in 51 innings. If we had to pick a top 3 for the playoffs tomorrow, I wouldn't put Grayson as the #3.
    • I hear you on the 19 year olds. I don’t buy it as an absolute. There is data both ways. COVID is still a factor too. Depends on the kid. Each player is judged on their own merits. Bobby Witt Jr. was 19 when drafted. 🤷🏼‍♂️ 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...