Jump to content

Mountcastle rookie/prospect eligibility tracker


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

We are coming down to the wire as to whether Ryan Mountcastle will maintain rookie/prospect eligibility for next season. I know it doesn't actually matter and Austin Hays' much ballyhooed 2020 rookie of the year campaign never took off, but I am still starting this thread to track it!

In order to qualify as a rookie (and appear on prospect lists), a player must have fewer than 130 at-bats (not plate appearances) and fewer than 45 pre-September days on the roster.

Mountcastle enters play today with 83 at-bats. There are 11 games left in the season so he needs to average fewer than 4.28 at-bats per game for the rest of the season.

It seems highly likely he will be able to manage this. He is averaging fewer than 4 at-bats a game. And between today's 7-inning double header and the new extra innings rule it seems fairly unlikely he will threaten 130 at-bats unless he stops walking entirely.

Stay tuned to this thread for daily updates!

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It isn't about RoY, it is about the end of season prospect lists.

 

Well, the lists and organizational rankings do give us something optimistic to talk about over the Winter. I do want to see where the media lists rank him after a good showing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Oh, it's about a RoY campaign for 2021, I'm all in.  And wildcard will get to remain calm (if he can) about maintaining a top 10 system.

A couple more good starts and Keegan Akin or Dean Kremer could find themselves (meaninglessly) on the back end of an offseason top 100 prospect list or two.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jammer7 said:

Well, the lists and organizational rankings do give us something optimistic to talk about over the Winter. I do want to see where the media lists rank him after a good showing. 

Probably not as high as we'd expect because he's an Oriole and there wasn't a lot of hype around him before the season. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think 2021 is going to be a wander-full season.

Well, he'll certainly be one to watch next year, I'm assuming he gets promoted.  

Not gonna lie, I love seeing guys like that fall flat on their face though and prove the writers wrong.  Last year they were practically ready to hand the RoY trophy to Vlad Jr. before the season started and he's done nothing to back up any of the hype.  Mountcastle has over half the career WAR Vlad Jr. has so far in his career with 560 less at bats.  

Now Vlad Jr. is still young but it'd be great to see Mountcastle live up to Vlad Jr's offensive potential despite not having any of the hype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

We are coming down to the wire as to whether Ryan Mountcastle will maintain rookie/prospect eligibility for next season. I know it doesn't actually matter and Austin Hays' much ballyhooed 2020 rookie of the year campaign never took off, but I am still starting this thread to track it!

In order to qualify as a rookie (and appear on prospect lists), a player must have fewer than 130 at-bats (not plate appearances) and fewer than 45 pre-September days on the roster.

Mountcastle enters play today with 83 at-bats. There are 11 games left in the season so he needs to average fewer than 4.28 at-bats per game for the rest of the season.

It seems highly likely he will be able to manage this. He is averaging fewer than 4 at-bats a game. And between today's 7-inning double header and the new extra innings rule it seems fairly unlikely he will threaten 130 at-bats unless he stops walking entirely.

Stay tuned to this thread for daily updates!

I want to see him named 2020 Oriole Most Valuable Player (MVP), and then next year win the AL Rookie of the Year (ROY).  Yes I'm spelling out acronyms because I chastised @interloper for his use of indecipherable acronyms earlier today. I plan on posting at least for a while like I've had my tech editor review everything.

Also, I need to go run a query for best seasons by someone who was still eligible for the ROY the next year.

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I want to see him named 2020 Oriole Most Valuable Player (MVP), and then next year win the AL Rookie of the Year (ROY).  Yes I'm spelling out acronyms because I chastised @interloper for his use of indecipherable acronyms earlier today. I plan on posting at least for a while like I've had my tech editor review everything.

Also, I need to go run a query for best seasons by someone who was still eligible for the ROY the next year.

I'd wait for Sixto's season to finish.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also:

Craig Wilson started his MLB career with the White Sox going 22-for-47 (.468), with a 1.256 OPS.  His career lasted another 126 games with a .624 OPS.

Shane Spencer famously broke in with the Yanks hitting .373/.411/.910 with 10 homers in 27 games in '98.  1.321 OPS.  He'd never again have an .800 OPS nor play more than 119 games in any MLB season.

Bill Madlock hit .351 in 77 at bats in '73, then finished '74 3rd in the ROY.

Geovany Soto had cups of coffee in '05 and '06, then in 60 at bats in '07 he had an 1.100 OPS.  Then was ROY in '08.  And was never really the same afterwards.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

JD Drew had an interesting start to his career where he tried to avoid the draft by playing for the independent St. Paul Saints, where he had an 1.110 OPS.  Then in his first MLB stint the next year he hit .417 with a 1.436 OPS in 14 games for the Cards.

Fred Lynn had maybe the greatest start to any career, ever.  In 15 games in '74 he hit .419/.490/.698.  Then of course was MVP and ROY with a .967 OPS in '75.

Stan Musial hit .426 as a 20 year old in '41, in 12 games. Then got MVP votes in each of his next 16 seasons, and 18 of the next 20..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Probably not as high as we'd expect because he's an Oriole and there wasn't a lot of hype around him before the season. 

 

I don’t care where Akin ranks on the prospect lists. Those are all about potential. If he keeps pitching like he has been, we will see the potential being realized where it counts, and that’s the important thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You’re actually making the most sense of just about anyone on here.   Hate to say it.  Lol
    • If you use him as an opener, it’s not really “relieving”.  I guess I don’t get the issue.  If a pitcher gets hurt and misses a period of time, are you saying it’s risky to ramp him back up to a normal innings load?
    • Ah. So you can only get one pick per player? That’s a bummer. Reasonable, I suppose. But a bummer nonetheless 
    • It's true that this has been discussed, and there are differing schools of thought.  Some, like myself, feel that the resources required in a Crochet deal, might be better served addressing a more impactful need for 2024: a ToR starter.  As a starter beginning next season, it's likely Crochet's impact will be higher as a strong ToR starter through the final two years of control.  In the meantime, there are quite a few very solid veteran late inning relievers that we could deal for in order to satisfy that need, and that wouldn't require near the cost of a Crochet.
    • It makes sense to me for multiple reasons. 1) IMO we do not have the requisite pitching talent in order to matchup favorably against the leagues best in a 7 game series in October. That needs to change. 2) We don’t need extra offense IMO. Nor a back up catcher. We will be fine offensively if we don’t have one considering without both we are number one in the sport. 3) We could resign Burnes with that 50 million (not sure where you are getting that number). But so many here believe it will be a bad deal. And having another #1 in house protects us from having to be leveraged against signing him.
    • Starter and then reliever and then back to starter. Risky risky risky. 
    • Why do we need to outbid someone for Skubal? We still have Bradish and Grayson for years to come. Also a punchers chance at resigning Corbin Burnes. You know what our record was before we signed Burnes? Best record in the AL. You know what our record has been since Bradish got hurt? Tracked down Yankees and took 3 game lead. We have resources to sign players next year. Elias is a value vs risk guy. He got Burnes with Joey Ortiz which is a top 50-60 prospect. He’s not giving up top 10 prospect for a player with 178 innings pitched. I like Crochet a lot but his track record isn’t long enough.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...