Jump to content

Orioles Lose Zach Pop and Grey Fenter in Rule Five


weams

Recommended Posts

Listened to an interview with Scott McGregor today.   He said that the O's Analytic department did not like Zach Pop throwing the power sinker.  He called it a Jim Johnson power sinker.  So they told him to not throw the sinker and instead throw the four steamer.

So I am thinking that this had to be before the arm troubles.   And when he is recovering they don't protect him from the Rule 5 because they do not think his arm will not hold up throwing his best pitch the power sinker.    Is that a good guess?  The sinker can be very effective but also pretty hard of the arm.  Johnson did well with it for a while then he had trouble.

https://pressboxonline.com/2021/03/16/talking-baseball-with-former-orioles-lhp-scott-mcgregor/

Scroll to 33.20

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think it has more to do with the O's not valuing someone who relies on a 2 seam fastball as much as someone who uses the 4 seamer.

I've don't recall seeing any evidence that the 2 seam fastball is harder on the arm.

Grip doesn't matter but he may pronate his arm differently.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

Listened to an interview with Scott McGregor today.   He said that the O's Analytic department did not like Zach Pop throwing the power sinker.  He called it a Jim Johnson power sinker.  So they told him to not throw the sinker and instead throw the four steamer.

So I am thinking that this had to be before the arm troubles.   And when he is recovering they don't protect him from the Rule 5 because they do not think his arm will not hold up throwing his best pitch the power sinker.    Is that a good guess?  The sinker can be very effective but also pretty hard of the arm.  Johnson did well with it for a while then he had trouble.

https://pressboxonline.com/2021/03/16/talking-baseball-with-former-orioles-lhp-scott-mcgregor/

Scroll to 33.20

Yes, that was a very interesting comment. They did something similar to Brenan Hanifee and we saw the terrible year he had 2019 after looking like a breakout guy in 2018. 

They certainly seems to be looking for a very particular type of pitchers with the high spin 4-seam fastballs, but I still think guys with good sinkers that get ground balls can be good as well. 

It seems like they basically were willing to risk losing Pop because he doesn't fit the mold they are looking for and it will be very interesting to follow this line of thinking and see how successful these guys are in the big leagues and who go to other teams and find success.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Do you trade him at 25 or do you extend him?  Franco at 28 is probably more valuable than what you got back.

I think it would depend on the money which assuming he's elite (or the conversation we're having is pointless) would be 300 million or higher then I think you have to trade him. I would look at it a little differently if I could afford one guy at elite $ and the majority of my team is cheap. But, they will begin to be expensive as they go through arbitration. If he's elite and two years away from FA, I don't see him signing below market. I think it also depends on what you have as a replacement. In this scenario I am assuming since my system is cray loaded due to previous trades and smart PD that I have a replacement that gets me within 2-3 wins or the pieces to get one. Then obviously the return. If you can get 4 prospects, 1 top 25 another top 100, then I think I would trade him. Paying one player that much money rarely works out for small to mid-market teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

 

Pop was 96-98 last night though he did give up three hard hits (two were actual hits) in his one inning of work. Statcast classified his fastball as a 2-seamer with an average of 2427 spin.

I doubt an arm like that is returned.

If someone asked me who would I rather have, Pop or Tyler Wells. I'd take Pop today and twice on Sunday. 

It appears Elias made a mistake here in leaving Pop unprotected while protecting Goudeau (who he already DFA'd and lost), Lakins and a 31-year old Sulser.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

Pop was 96-98 last night though he did give up three hard hits (two were actual hits) in his one inning of work. Statcast classified his fastball as a 2-seamer with an average of 2427 spin.

I doubt an arm like that is returned.

If someone asked me who would I rather have, Pop or Tyler Wells. I'd take Pop today and twice on Sunday. 

It appears Elias made a mistake here in leaving Pop unprotected while protecting Goudeau (who he already DFA'd and lost), Lakins and a 31-year old Sulser.

Have to agree.    I didn’t scream about it at the time because I didn’t know how Pop’s rehab was going or much about the Rule 5 crop available, but I wasn’t comfortable with the decision then and now it looks pretty foolish.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Pop was 96-98 last night though he did give up three hard hits (two were actual hits) in his one inning of work. Statcast classified his fastball as a 2-seamer with an average of 2427 spin.

I doubt an arm like that is returned.

If someone asked me who would I rather have, Pop or Tyler Wells. I'd take Pop today and twice on Sunday. 

It appears Elias made a mistake here in leaving Pop unprotected while protecting Goudeau (who he already DFA'd and lost), Lakins and a 31-year old Sulser.

Your last paragraph is the key.  The stupidity to keep those guys over Pop is amazing to me.  Elias hasn’t made many mistakes but that one was just flat out dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree with those who say he probably needs to figure it out in Norfolk, however, they could bring also bring him up for a look when any of Baker, Tate, or Vespi reboard the shuttle. Maybe Povich had earned the call up, whereas they don't think McDermott has done that, but bringing him up as a temporary move couldn't hurt too much for the aforementioned pitchers.
    • Big not necessarily tall is what he is saying.....Basallo is much thicker build, which actually may be better for a catcher anyway. Pudge was not thin--even before roids.
    • With this current starting pitching as is, barring an epic collapse by the Yankees, the chances of us winning the division are very low. Right now, in just about every other series (the series that Burnes and Rodriguez don't start) we are at a talent disadvantage. We have the #1 offense in all of baseball - we have scored the most runs and hit the most home runs and have scored 8, 11, and 17 in the last 3 series and we are all of 4-6 in our last 10 games. It's hard to see us being favored against even a decent team like the Mariners (with our starting pitching as is) given the talent disadvantage in the two rotations. Now we that doesn't mean that we couldn't/wouldn't pull it out. But I doubt that we would be favorites as things are going. And then when you look at a team like the Phillies with their rotation/offense/bullpen or even the Dodgers for that matter, I believe that even if we made it that far, we would be heavy underdogs against either opponent. I don't like our chances of continuously having to rely upon "beating the odds" round after round (I didn't even mention NY if we were to meet them). This is year 3 of Adley, 2 for Gunnar, and possibly our only with Burnes. Without making significant trades or major FA acquisitions, I don't see any near future scenarios where things are better for us, we have more talent or frankly a better opportunity.  Pitching injuries are so significant and so frequent in MLB now, that future projections are hazy at best. Because it is likely that you have to make pitching additions/acquisitions EVERY YEAR in order to seriously compete. If we don't make upgrades/trades this year, when will we do it? And what will be promised to us more than it is now?
    • I was wondering if you thought Coby Mayo should be brought up Roy.  
    • Cano hasn’t achieved consistent movement with his fastball, which really requires run and sink to be effective.  He’s also been hanging too many change ups.  I big part of his turn around last year was dropping to more of a sidearm delivery and his stuff gets flat when he loses that delivery slot.    
    • We need both.  My goal would be two backend bullpen arms and one starter at the deadline.  
    • I'm sorry but who cares about his walk rate. We are using Bryan Baker. We are using Suarez as a starter. We are using Vespi. We are not in a position to nitpick the guy's walk rate.  For god's sake, call up someone who has some upside. It's not like he's going to do much worse than what we have right now. And he might just go nuts out of the bullpen. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...