Jump to content

J.D. Mundy 2021


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Any reports on this kid? Signed as undrafted free agent, age 23 with some college experience (Radford and VA Tech). OPSed 1.038 at Delmarva (.461 OBP), now at .991 at Aberdeen. 2 for 4 with 2 BB and a three run bomb tonight. Seems like every time I check the box score he's got a line like that. Not in our Top 30 but sitting at 38 in the power rankings. Could he be a legit prospect in our top 30 with the next power ranking? 

From Roanoke. I wonder if someone at Norfolk had their eye on him? 

Not really blocked by anyone in the organization until you get to Mountcastle. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hit a second homer of the night after you posted this. A little old for Aberdeen, would love to see whether he could hold his own at Bowie in the second half of the season.

Certainly isn't blocked at Bowie. Would like to see Stowers and Daschbach get some time in Bowie as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s about time somebody started a thread about this guy.   It’s one thing for a college guy to dominate low A, but when they do it in hi A I take notice.   Not bad for an undrafted free agent.   Hopefully he keeps raking for a few more weeks and we may have to promote him to Bowie.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He's got a very short, compact left-handed swing that generates good power to all fields. Seems to have a nice idea of the strike zone and doesn't looked overmatched by offspeed pitches. I need to see him more against upper velocity, but it's hard not to be impressed with his bat.

Defensively, he's short for a first baseman (listed generously at 6 ft) and doesn't look like he has a lot of quickness over there, but I haven't seen anything that makes me think he can't play there effectively.

Once he made the adjustment at High-A, he's been very impressive. Considering he was basically a senior sign last year, he's been very impressive on his ability to not only hit, but hit for power at the professional level so far. 

If he ends up in Bowie the second half of this year and hits well there, I think you have to consider him a legitimate 1B prospect.

While I don't think Mundy will be a factor in whether to trade Mancini at the deadline(which I am against),  if he keeps hitting and moves up to AA in the 2nd half he could be a factor in whether the O's spend 10m on Mancini over the winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wildcard said:

While I don't think Mundy will be a factor in whether to trade Mancini at the deadline(which I am against),  if he keeps hitting and moves up to AA in the 2nd half he could be a factor in whether the O's spend 10m on Mancini over the winter.

That is the factor that is most important.  They should know right now if they are good with Trey's salary in 2022.  If there is any doubt, you move him now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve been thinking that the organization needed some power hitters in the coming draft, particularly at 1B. So it’s a nice surprise to see Mundy emerge from that void. I’d like to see him challenged at AA too. But just as much as I’d like to see how he fares at the next level, I’d like to see what he can do with a serious offseason of physical training. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

That is the factor that is most important.  They should know right now if they are good with Trey's salary in 2022.  If there is any doubt, you move him now.

I think that depends on what Elias wants from the 2022 team.  If he wants it to show progress and be a winning team with the addition of Adley, Grayson and Hall then he needs to have a power hitting middle of the lineup guy to team with Mountcastle at 1B/DH.   That could be Mancini or it could be  someone else like Mundy  if he progresses.  I don't think Elias will have the kind of read he needs on Mundy by the end of July.  It will take longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I think that depends on what Elias wants from the 2022 team.  If he wants it to show progress and be a winning team with the addition of Adley, Grayson and Hall then he needs to have a power hitting middle of the lineup guy to team with Mountcastle at 1B/DH.   That could be Mancini or it could be  someone else like Mundy  if he progresses.  I don't think Elias will have the kind of read he needs on Mundy by the end of July.  It will take longer.

As you said above though, Mundy won't influence how they value Mancini and what they're willing to pay him. Two independent things there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...