Jump to content

2022 MLB Draft Discussion (Use this thread to discuss all picks, not Orioles picks)


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, calsmanystances said:

Law's mock has us taking Lee. Not sure I'm a fan of this at 1-1 as it doesn't appear likely Lee will stick at SS (Law is not the only one who holds this opinion) and he didn't walk much prior to this season (18 walks in 55 games and 222 AB's in 2021 and 3 walks in 84 AB's at the Cape in 2021) .  His walks did jump this year (2022) to 46 while his K's and avg etc. stayed pretty consistent with 2021 (.342 34 k's in 55 games and 222 AB's in 2021 v. .357 with 28 K's in 235 AB's in 2022). According to D1Baseball, Cal Poly's SOS was 173rd. His numbers are good, but pale in comparison to Rutschman's (1.327 OPS) and Vaughn's (1.243 OPS) who played a tougher schedule in the PAC-12. Are we settling again? 

 

This highlights my concerns about Lee. He plays against weak competition and his numbers against that weak competition and on the Cape aren’t eye popping, with a concerning lack of walks against higher level competition.

I’ve seen posters say “you don’t tank for Johnson,” but are completely fine with Lee. Lee also is not a SS, is less athletic than Johnson if you trust Kiley McDaniel, and has less power potential. The three players that seem to have the most potential to be superstars are Jones, Holliday, and Green. Johnson might get there if you really believe in the hit tool and think he can get to 25-30 HRs. I would love to be convinced that Lee would be a great pick at 1-1, but I don’t see it. Maybe someone here can change my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Sydnor said:

This highlights my concerns about Lee. He plays against weak competition and his numbers against that weak competition and on the Cape aren’t eye popping, with a concerning lack of walks against higher level competition.

I’ve seen posters say “you don’t tank for Johnson,” but are completely fine with Lee. Lee also is not a SS, is less athletic than Johnson if you trust Kiley McDaniel, and has less power potential. The three players that seem to have the most potential to be superstars are Jones, Holliday, and Green. Johnson might get there if you really believe in the hit tool and think he can get to 25-30 HRs. I would love to be convinced that Lee would be a great pick at 1-1, but I don’t see it. Maybe someone here can change my mind.

You shouldn’t tank for Lee either.

There are 3 high upside guys in this draft worthy of the first pick and one of them is only worthy if you believe you can fix the swing and miss.

Outside of Jones, Holliday and Green, there isn’t a talent there that you take at 1.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you look at Holliday and Jones you see talented players who have tons of projection physically. That’s enticing.  Green and Johnson are already filled out.  And Lee is pretty much maxed out already.  So, agree that Holliday and Jones probably are the two most attractive picks for upside.  Green has a high ceiling but I worry that he’s a man among boys now and what happens when he’s a man among men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jackson Holliday is the pick for me. Great mix of floor and ceiling, great pedigree, will fit in well at Oriole Park if he pans out (Jones and Green will be hurt by Oriole Park if/when they make it to the majors). Holliday has several similarities to Gunnar Henderson. And if we can save $500k+ compared to Jones, also fits in with spreading money among the pool, which Elias clearly loves.

Johnson is too risky (size, defensive position), Green is also too risky (too much swing and miss, too high of a bust potential for 1.1) and I don't think Lee has the upside to justify taking him 1.1.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brooks The Great said:

Jackson Holliday is the pick for me. Great mix of floor and ceiling, great pedigree, will fit in well at Oriole Park if he pans out (Jones and Green will be hurt by Oriole Park if/when they make it to the majors). Holliday has several similarities to Gunnar Henderson. And if we can save $500k+ compared to Jones, also fits in with spreading money among the pool, which Elias clearly loves.

Johnson is too risky (size, defensive position), Green is also too risky (too much swing and miss, too high of a bust potential for 1.1) and I don't think Lee has the upside to justify taking him 1.1.

You take Holliday because you think he’s better.  You don’t take him because he saves you 500k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

You take Holliday because you think he’s better.  You don’t take him because he saves you 500k.

If they think Jones is clearly the best player I'm confident they'll take him.  Just not sure if the rumor of Sig loving Lee is real or a smokescreen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

If they think Jones is clearly the best player I'm confident they'll take him.  Just not sure if the rumor of Sig loving Lee is real or a smokescreen. 

Well he can really like him but still not take him.  I mean, you would love to have the top 5 picks of the draft because you always like a lot of guys.

I will not be convinced that they see more upside and ceiling in Lee than they do Jones or Holliday.  If they take Lee, my belief will be that they really like him but that his price tag is why he went 1, not because he was 1st on their board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lee's hit tool is rated 65 to 70.

Drew Jones hit tool is only 45.

Braves just went through this with Cristian Pache.  Tremendous arm, speed, you name it.  Traded for Matt Olson.

Athletics just demoted him to AAA.  Still can't hit a baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, waynebug said:

Lee's hit tool is rated 65 to 70.

Drew Jones hit tool is only 45.

Braves just went through this with Cristian Pache.  Tremendous arm, speed, you name it.  Traded for Matt Olson.

Athletics just demoted him to AAA.  Still can't hit a baseball.

Where did you see Jones with a 45 hit tool?

BA has him at 60, and MLB is a 55, the lowest I have seen anywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
    • I’m getting Gunnar as many PA’s as possible.    Gunnar Westburg O’Hearn Santander Mullins Mountcastle Rutschman Cowser Urias
    • I agree with the idea of stacking lefties in the lineup but O'Hearn scares me at 1st.  One misplay on a ball in the dirt and that may be the game.   I am one also that wouldn't mind seeing Holiday in the lineup as the DH.  We need people to get on base and he started tapping into that ability at the end of the season.  
    • Without looking, I bet your holiday was worse
    • Mullins should absolutely Lead Off Today. Keep westburg 2nd then Gunnar, Tony, O'hearn, Adley, Cowser, Kjerstad, Holliday. Try to jump these guys early.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...