Jump to content

Sun article bashing cartoon bird


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

I like the cartoon bird. Just bought a new cartoon bird hat, as a matter of fact.

I remember how glad everyone here was when it came back. Seemed like we started winning right after the change. Unfortunately, all we do is lose these days. I digress...

I am not one to make an association between something as insignificant as our hat with winning and losing, but I wouldn't mind seeing a change. Going the "classier" route has its appeal to me. Basically, the Friday night hats in all black with an orange script O's would be our version of that. Or something in an all black with an orange script B (kinda like the Baysox hat, but not nearly as loud). 

Again, no problem with the hat at all. Still a big fan. But I'm a huge hat guy (no exaggeration, I have probably 200 59 Fifty hats laying around), and as an adult, the cartoon bird hat is a little childish. Great to wear at the ball park or for yard work. But it's hard to rock a black, white, and orange tri-color hat with a cartoon bird on it in basically ever social situation outside of OPACY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

Great to wear at the ball park or for yard work. But it's hard to rock a black, white, and orange tri-color hat with a cartoon bird on it in basically ever social situation outside of OPACY.

I personally don’t find it hard. I wear what I want and don’t care whether someone dislikes my tri-color hat. That said you’ve got tons of “lifestyle” hat options from ‘47 Brand, New Era, etc. Is your desire to have the primary team cap be one that’s “classier?”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dr. Unk said:

People still read that rag?

They started dropping it on my driveway twice a week a few months ago, I guess hoping I might see some value in it and subscribe. 95% of the time it’s straight to the recycle bin. The exception is if my kid gets his hands on it first for the crosswords and comics. 

Edited by DoughBoy52
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is mostly tongue-in-cheek. The author doesn't like the cartoon bird, and wanted to make some jokes about it-- but doesn't intend their arguments to be serious. (The Taj Majal paragraph is the giveaway.) To me this is in the it's-satire-but-it's not-obviously-satirical-enough-to-be-entertaining category. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stephen Ruddy seems like someone I don't want to interact with. If this is satirical, he's so bad at being satirical that I wouldn't ever be able to tell if something he says is serious or not. And if this is for real and he thinks adults shouldn't wear a cartoon bird, then he just sounds miserable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange. Of all the things to complain about.

Not that this has anything to do with the article (I guess, didn't read it, just saw exerpts) in 1989 the Orioles ditched the cartoon bird and it seemed appropriate.  Everyone at the time loved the ornithologically correct bird and the new black-themed hats and uniforms.  It was a clean break with the malaise and crapulence of the 1984-88 era.  I wouldn't be opposed to some kind of 2023 uniform and/or logo change signifying a new era of success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

I think this is mostly tongue-in-cheek. The author doesn't like the cartoon bird, and wanted to make some jokes about it-- but doesn't intend their arguments to be serious. (The Taj Majal paragraph is the giveaway.) To me this is in the it's-satire-but-it's not-obviously-satirical-enough-to-be-entertaining category. 

Yes, author is a contributor to McSweeney's which is a literary magazine that publishes a lot of humor aimed at "intellectual" types audiences. Some of their stuff can be funny but I am just not getting this one. It could be a kind of next level meta-satire that I am not smart enough to understand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Strange. Of all the things to complain about.

Not that this has anything to do with the article (I guess, didn't read it, just saw exerpts) in 1989 the Orioles ditched the cartoon bird and it seemed appropriate.  Everyone at the time loved the ornithologically correct bird and the new black-themed hats and uniforms.  It was a clean break with the malaise and crapulence of the 1984-88 era.  I wouldn't be opposed to some kind of 2023 uniform and/or logo change signifying a new era of success.

Not me. I never liked the ornithologically correct bird on the hat but I did like the rest of the uniform although a bit plain jane. Saying that, I'm a big fan of the all black hat with orange bill and cartoon bird. 

FEmQzVfWQAwuIMR.jpg

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I liked the orintohlogircaylreeally correct bird when it first came out in '89 because...well, it was new.  I was also 8 and didn't know any better.  

But by the mid 90s, I really thought it was kind of lame.  Especially with the tweaks they'd come out with every so often.  I remember for a few years, I think in the early 2000s, it looked more like a pigeon than an Oriole.

It was just so...ugh, boring.  And bland.  And businesslike.  And unoriginal.  Other bird teams like the Blue Jays had that sharp profile of the Jay with the maple leaf but then they went ahead and philanderered with their own cartoon bird before getting back to their  roots.  The Cardinals have the sweet interlocking STL logo.  

But yeah, we were rocking essentially a picture out of a Sibley Guide to Birds book.  

I like the cartoon bird a lot with the black panel and the orange bill like Tony posted above.  Or a black panel, black bill is sweet, too.  I cannot stand the O's Friday night hats, I think they're the worst that we've ever had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Kjerstad has a great chance to be the O's right fielder in 2025.
    • Probably the most surprising part of our ML system this year is the advancement of young Latino pitchers. I tend to compare our system to the old Astros system. Luis Garcia and Christian Javier were never flame throwers. Both seemed to locate well with good sweepers.
    • The Orioles certainly don’t need another SP but I do think they should be in the market for guys with multiple years of control who are an upgrade on the number 4 spot in the rotation. After Burnes, Bradish and Grayson, the Orioles have a lot of decent options in Kremer, Irvin, Suarez and Povich but upgrading on them could make a big difference in a playoff game. And that’s assuming we have those top 3 SP healthy in the playoffs.  There’s a limited number of spots to upgrade this team before the playoffs. After the back end of the bullpen, the #4 spot in the rotation is most impactful. And with Burnes hitting free agency, there’s definitely a need to have another playoff-caliber SP.  Crochet and Luzardo are the two most interesting potentially available SP with that extra control, and we know the Orioles had trade talks with both clubs this off-season. They know the Orioles’ system. The Orioles shouldn’t (and won’t) trade Holliday/Mayo/Basallo for them, but I think Kjerstad as the headliner is on the table and there’s a lot of other secondary and tertiary pieces in the system that could make a deal possible. 
    • With the balanced schedule, there should only be 1 wild card team.  It is ridiculous to have a 162 game schedule that still puts 40% of the league into the playoffs.
    • The 1921 IL Orioles had a 27-game winning streak, which was the professional record* until broken by the 1987 Salt Lake Trappers. That would be nice to beat. * The 1869 Cincinnati Red Stockings won something like 81 consecutive games, but that was before leagues were established and many of the wins were against local amateur nines of questionable quality.
    • Agreed, plus with Urias and Hays we have very small samples plus adjusting to new non-everyday roles. Mullins and Hays have a longer way to go but I may be most concerned about Mullins since his "slump" really started in the second half last year.
    • No, it's not better to be a wild card team, it's better to win the division. But all you can do is play your best and hope the Yanks come back to the pack. You don't make short-term transactions and punt future wins to try to pass a 107-win Yankee team for the division title.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...