Jump to content

Grayson Rodriguez 2022


justD

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, interloper said:

Looked good today. Can't wait to see him with a less weirdly-angled CF camera, which I feel makes his stuff look more underwhelming than it is. 

I was wondering about the angle.  Didn’t look like his breaking stuff was A+ today.  Blew some guys away with fastballs but didn’t see a ton of swing and miss on breaking stuff.  Good outing against a solid lineup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My impressions of the game (I stopped watching once Grayson was out):

- Wild high throughout the first inning and showed his frustration on the mound.   I wasn’t too happy with his body language that inning.  
- Starts the leadoff batter in the 2nd with two nasty pitches for strikes, then hangs a breaking ball that’s hit for a double.   But, he induces a lunging pop fly to left and strikes out the next two.   
- The third hit also was on an 0-2 pitch, but it was pretty well thrown low and away and just a soft flare over the infield.   The runner was quickly erased on a DP grounder.    
- The other hit was a triple in the RF corner.   Seems like Stowers must have been playing toward the alley because it took him forever to get to that ball.   I believe Rodriguez got to 2 strikes on the next hitter but threw a pitch in a not great location that turned into a pretty deep sac fly.  
- Overall, I didn’t think Grayson was at his sharpest today.   Aside from his wild high first inning, he threw a fair number of pitches that weren’t anywhere near the strike zone, and the left a few over the middle that cost him.   I twice saw him go 3-2 on a hitter when he’d been ahead 0-2, and most of those pitches weren’t tempting.   
- Even so, he threw a lot of nasty, unhittable pitches as well.  I saw at least a couple diving change ups that produced strikeouts where the batter looked foolish.   
- As usual, I would have liked to see him challenged to go another inning.   
 

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, hutchead said:

What are the odds Elias shocks us and calls Adley up on Monday and Grayson  up on Tuesday?

Even if he called Grayson up next week, I bet he’d get him an extra day of rest before throwing him into the grind.  

I’d say there’s a non-zero chance, but I’d bet on Grayson staying down a bit longer.   I do think we see Adley next week sometime.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Even if he called Grayson up next week, I bet he’d get him an extra day of rest before throwing him into the grind.  

I’d say there’s a non-zero chance, but I’d bet on Grayson staying down a bit longer.   I do think we see Adley next week sometime.   
 

Yeah, I don't think it happens either but Grayson did pitch on four days rest today which lines him up for Tuesday. And we'll need a starter that day since today was a bullpen game. Great way for Elias to make a 1-2 splash since Ben McDonald hinted we would see Adley on Monday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, hutchead said:

Yeah, I don't think it happens either but Grayson did pitch on four days rest today which lines him up for Tuesday. And we'll need a starter that day since today was a bullpen game. Great way for Elias to make a 1-2 splash since Ben McDonald hinted we would see Adley on Monday.

No, today was a bullpen game because of the Sunday double header, that irons out the next time through the schedule. Tuesday would be Watkins on normal rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, seak05 said:

No, today was a bullpen game because of the Sunday double header, that irons out the next time through the schedule. Tuesday would be Watkins on normal rest.

It wouldn't really be normal rest because Watkins pitched yesterday which makes his normal turn on Monday. But I think we can all agree that whenever Grayson does debut, it will be Watkins who he replaces so now makes the perfect time to make that happen. But again, knowing Elias, that won't happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand and agree that Grayson is ready for the majors, but...

I still think he's getting used to the ball in AAA. I know that was kind of dismissed after his start, but he hasn't been very sharp on several outings in a row. I also think a lot of his K's are coming on high fastballs that pros are more likely to lay off of.

This is nitpicking, but I don't think he's at his best at this moment. That's still likely better than 1/2 of the major league starters right now. Can't wait until he really settles in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stretching out his K-BB% lead over the Meyers and Liberatores of the world.

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/minor-league?pos=all&level=0&lg=2&stats=pit&qual=y&type=1&team=&season=2022&seasonEnd=2022&org=&ind=0&splitTeam=false&players=&sort=11,1

Magnificently, if you toggle International League to Pacific Coast League, #1 in K-BB% today is Cesar Valdez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/13/2022 at 4:41 PM, Just Regular said:

Stretching out his K-BB% lead over the Meyers and Liberatores of the world.

https://www.fangraphs.com/leaders/minor-league?pos=all&level=0&lg=2&stats=pit&qual=y&type=1&team=&season=2022&seasonEnd=2022&org=&ind=0&splitTeam=false&players=&sort=11,1

Magnificently, if you toggle International League to Pacific Coast League, #1 in K-BB% today is Cesar Valdez.

Ole'!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...