Jump to content

Cesar Prieto 2022


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Just because Gunnar is 20 years old doesn’t mean he can’t be better than the rest of the league and be promoted.  The age biases on stuff like this make no sense to me. 

Very small sample but others have pointed out he does have a major developmental issue which is his splits vs LHP. I would not be opposed to moving him up but I don't think it is simply age bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Why would moving Gunnar to AAA right now be rushing him?  Seems to me that he is doing very well against AA competition and challenging him in AAA wouldn’t be a bad thing at all.

He's had 114 at bats at Double A. 

I have no problem moving him up in a few weeks if his hot streak continues, but I'd like to see a larger sample size.  There is no reason to rush him at this point.  He's not going to see Baltimore in 2022 regardless of how he performs. 

Prieto meanwhile is at an age and an experience level where a promotion or even double-promotion is warranted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

He's had 114 at bats at Double A. 

I have no problem moving him up in a few weeks if his hot streak continues, but I'd like to see a larger sample size.  There is no reason to rush him at this point.  He's not going to see Baltimore in 2022 regardless of how he performs. 

Prieto meanwhile is at an age and an experience level where a promotion or even double-promotion is warranted. 

So 114 at bats isn’t enough but 150 at bats would be?

Look, I get the point but there is no magic formula of age or number of at bats or anything like that in which is should be determined when a player moves up.  There are guys who are stars in the majors at age 20. I don’t think Gunnar sees Baltimore in 2022 either but that doesn’t mean that’s the right move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over his last ten games, which includes a 12 day IL break for a hamstring injury, Prieto is slashing .432/.523/.946/1.469 with 5 HRs in 5 BBs, 4 K's over his last 44 PAs.

I'd say he's due a promotion. Honestly, I'd be ok with moving Ortiz back down to A-ball unil he can get things going. Either way, at his age, it's time for AA.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

I kind of like the idea of skipping him to AAA.   

I agree, unfortunately it will never happen.  Elias is rigid in his formula of players needing a certain number of at bats or innings pitched at each level before they can be promoted.  The rigidness is annoying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

So 114 at bats isn’t enough but 150 at bats would be?

Look, I get the point but there is no magic formula of age or number of at bats or anything like that in which is should be determined when a player moves up.  There are guys who are stars in the majors at age 20. I don’t think Gunnar sees Baltimore in 2022 either but that doesn’t mean that’s the right move.

I don't have a set number of at bats in mind.  But it's probably not 114.  

Is there a number that is too small for you?  Very few high school position prospects are making their MLB debut at age 20.  And the ones who are probably aren't coming off a year where they were struggling for long periods of time in A ball. 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you were one of the posters who was calling for Westburg's promotion to Triple A very early in the season?  Look where he's at now.  There is no magical formula but there is such thing as too small a sample size. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

I don't have a set number of at bats in mind.  But it's probably not 114.  

Is there a number that is too small for you?  Very few high school position prospects are making their MLB debut at age 20.  And the ones who are probably aren't coming off a year where they were struggling for long periods of time in A ball. 

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think you were one of the posters who was calling for Westburg's promotion to Triple A very early in the season?  Look where he's at now.  There is no magical formula but there is such thing as too small a sample size. 

I would still be fine if they promoted Westburg. Not saying they should but if they announced it today, I wouldn’t be upset about it.  I think people are extremely overboard with how they feel these guys should be handled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I would still be fine if they promoted Westburg. Not saying they should but if they announced it today, I wouldn’t be upset about it.  I think people are extremely overboard with how they feel these guys should be handled.

I'm not sure what your standard is exactly.  It seems like if prospect A has 50 good at bats, he should be promoted a level.  Regardless of anything else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

I'm not sure what your standard is exactly.  It seems like if prospect A has 50 good at bats, he should be promoted a level.  Regardless of anything else. 

Not really.  It depends on a lot of things but amount of at bats and age aren’t really it.  How do they look?  Do they belong?  Are they overmatched? Are they doing everything well?  
 

I don’t care if Henderson is still in AA but it’s also justified that he gets moved up.  Remember, this is a kid who turned heads with his maturity in ST LAST YEAR.  
 

I don’t look at him and say, well he’s 20 years old so he must have more time in AA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Not really.  It depends on a lot of things but amount of at bats and age aren’t really it.  How do they look?  Do they belong?  Are they overmatched? Are they doing everything well?  
 

I don’t care if Henderson is still in AA but it’s also justified that he gets moved up.  Remember, this is a kid who turned heads with his maturity in ST LAST YEAR.  
 

I don’t look at him and say, well he’s 20 years old so he must have more time in AA.

I'm not doing that either.  But age is a factor among other things. I also take into account the sample and his performance last year. 

I put a little more stock into things I can measure rather than spring training reports that someone is turning heads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • On #1: the question is whether all of Mayo, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Holliday have everyday roles or if are some platooned or held back in Norfolk or traded? If they all play everyday, there’s not really a meaty role to offer to a new bat. In the various post-mortems, this seems to be one of the biggest points of differences among posters.  Some want no logjams while others want one or more proven MOO professional hitters and don’t want to rely on Holliday or Mayo. My view is in the middle of the spectrum. I think at least one of Cowser or Mullins needs to sit vs. LHP, so we need a lefty masher capable of playing left field at Camden.  I think we may consider trading Mounty to make room for Mayo.
    • I find #8 to be an interesting one. On the one hand, McCann seems well-liked, he brings some toughness and veteran presence, and he actually had his best offensive season since 2020. At 35, you can probably have him for a 1 year deal if you want. And Basallo isn't really that close to coming up and catching just yet. He's a deep 2nd half kind of callup if you need him. And it's not like the free agent backup catcher market is much better than McCann. On the other hand, I have a sour taste in my mouth from game 1 where he couldn't make contact with men on base. Adley certainly didn't get any better under his wise tutelage. And maybe there are guys out there who surpass McCann defensively and bring a different wrinkle to the clubhouse. So I wouldn't be mad about a change. 
    • Actually 10 - I fat fingered the post button before I was ready.
    • This is my thought process regarding the pitching staff next season, ideally we resign Burnes but if not another TOR like Snell or Fried need to be signed this offseason.  Eflin GRod and Kremer are a really solid 2,3,4 the 5 spot is open to competition but realistically there will probably be some injuries or fatigue that require all of these guys contributing. 
    • 1. Where on the spectrum should Elias anchor between “let the kids play” vs. “sign proven bats”? 2. How do we get a right-handed bat to come here given Walltimore? 3. How many years do you think we should be willing to commit to a starting pitcher?  Where do you expect Elias to fall? 4. Between vets, rookies, and prospects, who can we trade / should we trade / do we trade for pitching or a bat? 5. What budget will ownership give to Elias? To what extent will he max out on his constraint? 6. What coaching and front-office personnel changes should/will we make? What about infrastructure or changes to org philosophies? 7. Whom, if anyone, should we try to extend, considering their agent and what they will likely demand financially?  8. For backup catcher, do we re-up McCann or go in a different direction? 9. Does it make sense to sign a blue chip reliever given the spotty track record of those signings (e.g., of 25 relievers signing for > $3MM last year, 2 had WAR of at least 0.5 in both fWAR and bWAR)? 10. Does Elias make any outside-the-box moves  (e.g., convert Akin to SP, sign a FA infielder, move JH to CF, find the next Suarez)?
    • Hope to take my kids but it will depend on the ticket prices.  I couldn’t believe how expensive the tickets were when they were in DC
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...