Jump to content

Are the O's turning a corner?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, PHRESH said:

, and I thought maybe I was being a little too optimistic and hoping to make a splash signing or too in the upcoming off-season. You're ready to go now! 

Pitching looks for real to me. We have Adley coming up and our OF and 1B appear set. The time is now IMO. Elias should be recognizing this. Start plugging some holes. 2B in particular but who knows whats available at 3B and even SS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

I was waiting to hear this from someone. Would have been hard to add better pitching. Infield is where the difference could have been made in theory. 
 

Either way if this keeps up it does put pressure on them to make some moves. 

First of all, yes the left side of the IF could be much better.

Secondly, the pitching won't hold up and they definitely could use another reliever too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • This team can be fun to watch but it still has "warts." Let's enjoy but not get too far out in space. Remember, most predicted a 60 to 70 win season.  One past manager said - and I paraphrase - you can tell what kind of team you have after the first 30 games. IF, (notice the BIG IF) the pitching stays consistent and the hitting dosen't regress to awful again, maybe!!!! Enjoy the ride but it's a little early for playoff tickets. I do think we are building toward much better and it is starting to show.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

First of all, yes the left side of the IF could be much better.

Secondly, the pitching won't hold up and they definitely could use another reliever too.

Of course it could. 

The better they play this year the more pressure it puts on them to make moves next year. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Of course it could. 

The better they play this year the more pressure it puts on them to make moves next year. 
 

 

The pressure is to get the young players up here and start to really see what you have and to give them the proper experience that they need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The pressure is to get the young players up here and start to really see what you have and to give them the proper experience that they need.

Who other than Adley and Grayson is coming up soon?  Hall if he stays healthy will be up later.  Then who ? I don’t see anybody else this year. Gunnar is next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

Who other than Adley and Grayson is coming up soon?  Hall if he stays healthy will be up later.  Then who ? I don’t see anybody else this year. Gunnar is next year.  

Adley should be up yesterday.  Grayson very soon.  Hall within a month or so.

Stowers should be up soon as well.  Diaz is a possibility.

No need to wait on Henderson until 2023 if he keeps this up.

Westburg can be up once he snaps out of his funk.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Adley should be up yesterday.  Grayson very soon.  Hall within a month or so.

Stowers should be up soon as well.  Diaz is a possibility.

No need to wait on Henderson until 2023 if he keeps this up.

Westburg can be up once he snaps out of his funk.

 

I don’t see Gunnar up here no matter how well he does this year. 

Westburg is not hitting at AA.  He is more of a 23 option with his performance. If he was hitting like Gunnar that is different. 
 

Stowers isn’t hitting and he and Diaz need space to play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PHRESH said:

Are the O's turning around and going back around the corner? 

Corners are tough to navigate sometimes.

That being said, I'm pretty sure that Spencer Watkins is not a key part of turning any corners. He is most likely to be removed from the rotation once GRod and Hall are ready. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Momentum is the next day's starting pitcher.

I can't blame Spenser Watkins for taking MLB paychecks anymore than I think B-Ref showing Hyde in the Bottom 25 all-time vs. 500 is much about him.    Some of getting actually good for 2023 and beyond will be improving depth and floor so that if another of our Shane Baz-John Means types need elbow surgery waaay below replacement level performers don't automatically become front-line mainstays.   

Also probably not advisable to try a game with a de facto bench of one Anthony Bemboom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I have total faith that he will get a SP and a RP, and those will be without trading any of the top 3 prospects. And the only player Kjerstad could go for is Crochet. (I don’t think Skubal will even be available, and even if the Tigers listen on him he won’t be dealt.) What I don’t have total faith in is how good those SP and RP will be. I think the trade deadline is very unpredictable, and Elias is not the type to overpay to get Option A. He’s more likely to get outbid on Option A and pivot to Options B, C or D at better value, and that all has to happen very quickly in a compressed timeframe right before the deadline. So if things don’t break right they easily could end up with some underwhelming guys like last year.
    • Things to consider… We’re sort of pot committed to try and win a WS this year since we have Butnes.  What has more value?  Skubal for 3 postseasons or Holliday for 6?  Give me the SP.  Isn’t it risk adverse to acquire Skubal and have a big 3 rotation to limit having a red hot lineup beat you?  Ala Rangers.  If not Skubal now, we still have to make a big trade in the offseason to replace Burnes. Why not make the trade now and have that SP paired with Burnes?
    • Are they? Wells doesn't throw hard by today's standards, neither does Means.  
    • IMO I see Skubal as helping us much more than Fedde next year.  I’m concerned about this outlier season from Fedde as nothing more than catching lightening in a bottle (especially at his age and with his track record before this season). Also, for all of the concern over Skubal and Crochet’s innings, Fedde has only thrown something like 133 innings as a career high in a single season.
    • With the caveat that we may have to trade some of their best friends to get those guys.  Do you regard Scherzer as a TOR pitcher you’d be happy getting as the top get?
    • I’m gonna play devils advocate for giggles.  As much as I want to win 2024, I don’t want to trade any of our standout prospects for a starter. I’m growing more and more fond of pitchers who have success because of pitch location and don’t max out on velocity. They’re less sexy, but they’re less vulnerable to TJ and cost less to acquire. Skubal is undoubtedly one of the best pitchers in baseball, but he’s upped his velocity each of the past two years. Means was a middling prospect until he found more velocity…..until he wrecked his arm. How are we going to feel about our competitive window if we give a huge haul for someone like Skubal and he’s under the knife in August? If the Royals stank and Seth Lugo was available, that’s the kind of guy I’d be targeting at a smaller cost of talent. Only a few teams are really out of the WC. If Oakland would trade Joey Estes for Connor Norby (spitballing suggestion only, don’t attack me), we’d probably lose our minds that ME didn’t shoot higher. But all things considered, including risk aversion, I’m not convinced that kind of pitcher and trade (preferably a lefty) wouldn’t be better for us. I don’t want to be on the flip side of a Bedard trade. We can sign a top FA starter (Rubenstein willing) who blows out his arm and not be deeply impacted, but we shouldn’t spend our prospect capital for a short term ace rental who’s lost to injury for his tenure….I’m more inclined to protect our competitive window. 
    • I don’t think any pitcher is a given. All of them carry the risk of the next pitch being the last for the season. But risk should be weighed vs potential reward. The proposition to be considered is what is more risky? Acquiring a starter with very high potential for reward (like Skubal) who is at risk for injury vs. acquiring a lesser talented starter who offers less upside yet still is at risk for injury vs. doing nothing/rolling with what we have with pitchers who are almost assuredly to give you a much lower ceiling and still carry the risk of injury.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...