Jump to content

The Trey Mancini Appreciation Thread


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
11 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’m very happy for Trey.  I wish he’d been more of a contributor, but obviously the win was still very sweet for him.   Couldn’t happen to a classier guy.  

And he can always say that he got a hit, an RBI, and made a great defensive play in the World Series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Natty said:

Mancini with the O's vs with the Astro's

Orioles... 268/347/404/751

Astros...176/258/364/622

Is Houston going to dump him?

Are we going to get him back? 

It is sometimes easier to produce when there are low expectations for the team. Not a lot of pressure in Baltimore when Trey played.  He was the “face” of the franchise for years which just shows you how far we have fallen. Trey seems like a great guy and it is great to see him win the World Series. What a story! Life is great! Fighting for his life to getting a WS ring!!
Whether we keep or trade Mountcastle, we do not need Trey back. He was solid for us but we need an upgrade like Abreu. That’s the veteran bat we need to help our young lineup. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Right..if the Orioles can trade for Brenton Doyle (my favorite top target), why should we care that his salary is low? Also in that scenario, Mullins is likely gone, so payroll would actually go down I believe. But someone like Bemore wins would still complain because the payroll isn’t where he thinks it should be.
    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...