Jump to content

Poll: What’s your view of the Mancini trade?


Frobby

What’s your view of the Mancini trade  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. What’s your view of the Mancini trade?

    • Don’t like it - I didn’t want to trade him
    • Don’t like it - the return wasn’t enough
    • OK with it -we needed to get what we could even if a little disappointed with the return
    • Like it - very solid return for Mancini
    • Love it - really surprised we got that much for Mancini

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/06/22 at 16:38

Recommended Posts

I said like it, to be honest I love the return, a lot more than I expected.  I couldn't hit submit on the "love it" option though because even though it was the right move to trade him it still hurts to see Mancini go.  Especially when we have winning record.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recognize that it was a good move to trade him and that the prospects are better than what we could have expected. 
 

But I just don’t feel totally excited about a guy that can’t throw strikes and another that is unbelievably far from being ready yet needs almost immediate action to retain him. I can easily envision Johnson being left off the roster this off-season and being taken in the rule 5 or being added to the roster and then just not being ready by 2026 to have a permanent place on the active roster. I can also easily envision McDermott having even more struggles as he gets to the upper minors as his competition will be even less likely to swing and his walks go up even further. 
 

Again, I recognize that it was a return for a rental DH/1B so to get two prospects that land at #8 and #12 on an already solid farm system seems like a win. I just  have a hard time believing these two players are going to have any more impact than what they got in return for Schoop or Cashner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pleasantly surprised Elias was able to get this much. I did not want to see Mancini dealt for A-ball lottery tickets but these guys are more than that immediately being slotted well up into our list of top prospects and clearing some room on the major league roster for the young talent coming up at the same time. Elias really knows what he's doing, let's just hope the purse strings get loosened starting this offseason to start rounding this thing out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm happy for Trey. Not only does he get to participate in playoff baseball on a top 5 team, but he will get a national stage to showcase his talents before hitting free agency. Doesn't much matter whether we got much back this trade was what was best for Trey and I'm glad Elias worked something out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Frobby changed the title to Poll: What’s your view of the Mancini trade?
33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

So what’s your true feelings?  

I love the trade and just the thought process behind it.

Where I differ is the solid return vs surprise.  Maybe it’s just semantics but for me, I’m not surprised the return is solid although I never would have guessed a Johnson level prospect but the injury changes that equation.

The likelihood, like so many mid season trades for rentals, is that neither of these guys become anything.  However, I don’t feel this was a dump either.  This was a really well done trade imo (bonus points for a 3 team deal! :D ).

I also, as I said before, love how Elias separates emotion from intelligence.  It’s a tough trait to have but it’s a necessary one.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stated this in another thread, but Johnson fills the talent gulf between the GRod/Hall tier and the Rom/Denoyer/Baumler tier. And it's not like he's a 19 yr old kid in low A. When he's back from TJS, he's likely to move from A+ to AA and maybe to AAA by the end of that season.

I like that we didn't dump Trey for "a couple of 17 year olds" or at the other end of the spectrum, some AAA Mattson-type guys. We received true talent. McDermott, too - he throws hard and we've seen success with wrangling in some power arms here. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The injury to Johnson is the only reason we were able to get him in the first place (in my opinion) and he will be old for a prospect if he makes it to the majors. I'll still take the gamble on talent over fringe guys. This seems to be a recent strategy; take big gambles in the draft and also with trades like this. The upside is a pitcher that can be a good starter, and another guy that could be a nice bullpen find. Even if one of those things happens it's a win. I loved having Mancini on the team, and I do think there's a relatively high chance neither of the pitchers pan out, but I don't see how anyone could hate the trade based on value for a couple months of an average DH/1B. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

This was a really well done trade imo (bonus points for a 3 team deal! :D ).

We kid about your penchant for 3-team trade scenarios in days gone by, but in this particular case, it was truly a savvy move that enabled Elias to acquire 2 high-upside pitchers.  It was very unlikely that one team would trade away 2 such prospects for a rental of a DH/1B, even one as beloved as Mancini.   The cost against the farm system just wouldn't make sense for one team.  Fantastic move, really.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, O-The-Memories said:

The injury to Johnson is the only reason we were able to get him in the first place (in my opinion) and he will be old for a prospect if he makes it to the majors. I'll still take the gamble on talent over fringe guys. This seems to be a recent strategy; take big gambles in the draft and also with trades like this. The upside is a pitcher that can be a good starter, and another guy that could be a nice bullpen find. Even if one of those things happens it's a win. I loved having Mancini on the team, and I do think there's a relatively high chance neither of the pitchers pan out, but I don't see how anyone could hate the trade based on value for a couple months of an average DH/1B. 

The organization is finally healthy and deep top to bottom, the perfect time to gamble on high risk / reward guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...