Jump to content

Orioles get Brett Phillips


RVAOsFan

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

Sure, but that extra year of service time would make him more valuable in a trade. I just like seeing us min/maxing the talent we have and getting the most value from it. It may not amount to anything, but I’m not sure there’s much value in bringing him up early either. 

Does it tho?

If the O's are unlikely to want him at that rate in his final year of team control what are the odds another team is going to trade more for that year?

Odds are against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Stowers isn’t here because we have Hays, Mullins, and Santander and now Vavra.  That’s 4 players for the OF and DH with Rutschman also getting DH AB’s.  No room.   Any promotion of Stowers, Henderson, or Westburg depends on either injury or the release of Rougned Odor which doesn’t seem likely.

And yet we added Phillips?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RarityFlaherty said:

Sure, but that extra year of service time would make him more valuable in a trade. I just like seeing us min/maxing the talent we have and getting the most value from it. It may not amount to anything, but I’m not sure there’s much value in bringing him up early either. 

How valuable is say a 30 year old Stowers going to be in a trade? Sadly, there's a much higher probability that Stowers will be out of baseball or have relatively little value when he's 30. That's just the harsh demographics of baseball. If you think about it in terms of total WAR per dollar that the Orioles will get from Stowers (including WAR they would acquire from a trade of Stowers), it's just a very low probability that the extra year will mean anything. There is at least a decent chance that the Orioles would yield more WAR from their investment in Stowers if they called him up this year so he would be better prepared for next year. 

 

The Orioles have been conservative with most of their prospects, so maybe their statistical model suggests there's a benefit to slow walking prospects. But Stowers is really different than Adley and Grayson. Maybe they have Stowers working on something specific at AAA? The Orioles promotion behavior has been hard to predict.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Does it tho?

If the O's are unlikely to want him at that rate in his final year of team control what are the odds another team is going to trade more for that year?

Odds are against it.

You don’t have to wait until the final year of control to trade him though. Wouldn’t he be worth more with 2 years of control left vs 1 year? You guys are probably right that it may not amount to anything, but I think maximizing value is how we are going to stay competitive. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

How valuable is say a 30 year old Stowers going to be in a trade?

We don’t have to wait that long to trade him. Keeping that year of control would make him more valuable if we tried to trade him next year or the year after. 
 

You do make a good point of preparing him for next year though. I wonder, how much value the coaching staff sees in that? I’m sure that would have to be weighed against the extra year of control, in terms of value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It’s a valuable tool for a few players.  Most of the time, it’s not valuable.  Stowers isn’t a guy you manipulate.  Are you really waiting until next May or so to call him up?

I don’t advocate manipulating Stowers’ service time.   However, the fact that the extra year does not turn out to be valuable most of the time isn’t really relevant, because in those cases where it does turn out to be valuable, it can be extremely valuable.   And a guy like Stowers could be one of those cases.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

Why wouldn’t you want to manipulate all players? Isn’t that the best way to get the maximum value from them? An extra year of control either keeps them around longer or gives them more value if traded. 

Because there are things that are more important, like winning games.  This strategy is fine for certain players in certain team situations.  The Os are no longer in a situation where you should be doing that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sports Guy said:

Because there are things that are more important, like winning games.  This strategy is fine for certain players in certain team situations.  The Os are no longer in a situation where you should be doing that.

Is winning this year more important though? I think I’d agree with you on this next year, but I don’t think the team is ready to actually compete yet. We just don’t have the starting pitching to compete with the best teams in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

You don’t have to wait until the final year of control to trade him though. Wouldn’t he be worth more with 2 years of control left vs 1 year? You guys are probably right that it may not amount to anything, but I think maximizing value is how we are going to stay competitive. 

I don't think fringe cases like this will make a difference one way or another.

I think you get and stay competitive mostly through drafting and international players supplemented by free agents. 

The impact on the team from theoretically trading a Stowers with two years of service time instead of one is at best marginal.

I think the advantage to be gained by the players getting ML experience in a non-competitive season far outweighs it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RarityFlaherty said:

Is winning this year more important though? I think I’d agree with you on this next year, but I don’t think the team is ready to actually compete yet. We just don’t have the starting pitching to compete with the best teams in the playoffs. 

Im Not talking about winning in 2022.  I’m talking about 2023 and in your scenario, these guys aren’t up until late April/early May next year..which means they then have to get their feet wet before they start getting comfortable, if they ever do.  That’s not a recipe for winning in 2023.
 

If you bring up Stowers this year and he strikes out 40% of the time and struggles with his game, you perhaps know you don’t move Santander or you add an OFer.  But you don’t know that if you don’t play him.

You have to see what these guys can do and get them experience to get them ready to be on a winner in 2023, not to mention give you options this offseason.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Seems to be a lot of angst over picking up a reserve outfielder for cash considerations.  Not worth worrying about, imo.

Again, it's not about what we gave up, it's about who he takes playing time/roster spots away from. 

There was a vision with this year's team: filter in the prospects as the year goes along. Phillips actively hinders that vision by blocking Stowers, and potentially limiting playing time for Vavra, Diaz, and McKenna, who are all much, much more deserving of playing time than Phillips on a rebuilding team. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Im Not talking about winning in 2022.  I’m talking about 2023 ... That’s not a recipe for winning in 2023.

 

I'm so jaded now about when Elias ever thinks we'll be ready to start winning.  After what happened this past off-season and what's happened throughout the year with guys being brought up (or not) and what happened at this trade deadline even after becoming a .500+ team, I will be pleasantly surprised if they'll be trying to win in 2023, and I seriously doubt they will be. 

Sorry for the pessimism this morning. Confusion reigns. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I didn't watch a pitch Sunday after that Saturday debacle. I had a charity ride to attend anyways, but I was not wasting a Sunday on this 2024 squad.  I'll probably watch some of the Yankees game, but my heart is out of this squad. I still want them to win, but they have given me no reason since May to think this team has any special abilities.  Injuries hurt them for sure, but they just don't have that "it" factor. They have the choke factor down pat though. I can deal with a bad team. Hell, I ran this place through the darkest, leanest years.  But what I can't deal with is an anti-clutch team. This is a team that can look victory in the face and find a way to lose. This is team with no ability to finish off a comeback.  Hell, even in their walk offs it's after their relievers choked away a lead.  The lack of hitting is boring. The lack of situational hitting is boring. The strikeout/homerun all or nothing approach is boring. The fact that they no longer steal bases or put pressure on the defense unless you count Masolino getting guys thrown out by 10 feet, is boring. The fact that both of their super prospects not came up did poorly, but literally crapped the bed and hit like pitchers is boring.  The fact that both of their number one overall selections have been either bad or awful is boring.  The fact that the "TOR" they picked up this offseason took a month and half "off" is boring. The fact that the Orioles still have Jimenez and Rivera on this team is boring.  It's just a boring team.  I'm just not interested in this 2024 squad and have zero faith in them that they can do anything in the playoffs. Even against the Royals (who will run all over the Orioles if they play them) or Twins, I don't give them much of a chance.  I'll never root against an Orioles team, and I hope that some miracle happens and they suddenly become a better team. But I will continue to say that this has been one of the most frustrating Orioles Playoff teams of all time. 
    • Now that Snyder has gone I can passively hope they do well. They should have kept the old name (Washington Football Team).
    • Daniels just completed a pass for 55 yards thru the air.  The guy has a heck of an arm.  Commanders look like a good team again and are dominating an 0-2 Bengals team that is desperate for a win.  21-10 in 2nd quarter.  
    • Westburg is the guy I'd want to run a bit more, he seems a bit more like a heady type player so I could see his instincts growing there, and he had decent numbers in the minors. He's had an interesting year in the SB department, stole 4/5 in the month of April, then 1/3 in May and 1/1 in June, but hasn't had a straight steal since June 3rd. Wonder if moving up in the lineup killed his run game?
    • Or a guy that can just come up and give innings when the bullpen is shot after a doubleheader or even give a spot start and then be sent back down.  Is Pham a likely future ML starter, no, but he might bail the O's out of a pitching bind multiple times next year.  
    • Saturday's game was epically bad and not the type of loss a team on the upswing into the playoffs would suffer and one that I certainly hate to witness. I couldn't watch most of the game Sunday, but I wouldn't DVR it and then peek at the score either, I don't think that I would ever watch if I knew the outcome of a game in advance. The surprise elation (Gunnar's bases loaded double) and the agony of the non-send and inability to hit a sac fly is what keeps me coming back, old fool that I am.
    • Predicting what the attendance will do next year is like predicting Hurrican season in January.  There are so many outside factors that it is just a guess.  How will they finish the year, how much will the spend in the offseason, how many corporations want to get ticket plans,   how is the economy in 6 months, how do they play next season what teams we play and when, will teams like Red Sox, Yankees and big draws play well.   I also think one of the biggest factors is what corporations want to sponsor give aways and what time of promotions will they run.  If you look at attendance some of the largest attendance games minus the Phillies, Yankees games are for the best giveaway souvenirs.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...