Jump to content

Here’s something that is irking me greatly


Frobby

Recommended Posts

We had a 9-8 season series lead on Tampa and ended up losing the season series 10-9, losing the final two.

We had a 9-7 season series lead on Boston and ended up losing the season series 10-9, losing the final three.

We had a 6-2 season series lead on Toronto and have allowed it to get to 8-8.   We’ll lose that season series unless we win 2 of the final three.

New York?  Different story, they’ve kick our butts all year.  

We easily could have won the season series with Tampa, Boston and Toronto and have squandered the first two.  Boston in particular really  irritated me.   Losing the season series to Toronto after dominating them early would really add insult to injury. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was worse with Boston.  We had a 7-4 season series lead and only needed to win 3 of the last 8.  We won 2. Fitting that Martinez delivered the kill shot, given that he has obliterated us for his entire career.  

1-5 against Detroit (and literally going all the way until the 6th game to score a run off of one of their starters) is bad, but losing the season series to every divisional opponent does not feel like progress.  We may still pull it out against Toronto, and I am hoping we do because that would mean 82 wins and a good way to end the season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have qualified that because yes, mathematically it is progress when you don't lose as much to your divisional opponents as you did before.  It is kind of like the old 80s movie Summer School.  The average score for the class went from a 28 to a 63.  Still not passing....but enough to get Mr. Shoop tenure!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cold fact is we and the Yankees had overperformed earlier, the Jays had underperformed, and it's a long long season during which there's a lot of ebb and flow. Remember when Zimmerman seemed like a solid starter and Akin was flawless? When Mateo, Hays, and Urias seemed to have found their groove as hitters? I am quite pleased that we have improved an amazing 70+% against the AL East teams compared to miserable 2021. Take a step back and compare our starting rotations to those of the Yankees, Rays, or Blue Jays. We're lucky to have done as well as we did.

Edited by LA2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, LA2 said:

The cold fact is we and the Yankees had overperformed earlier, the Jays had underperformed, and it's a long long season during which there's a lot of ebb and flow. Remember when Zimmerman seemed like a solid starter and Akin was flawless? When Mateo, Hays, and Urias seemed to have found their groove as hitters? I am quite pleased that we have improved an amazing 70+% against the AL East teams compared to miserable 2021. Take a step back and compare our starting rotations to those of the Yankees, Rays, or Blue Jays. We're lucky to have done as well as we did.

Yep - I think end of the day, we ended up being around a .500 team.  Underperformed for a bit, then overperformed for a bit, then ended up where we should be.  Which is still great progress, with work still to be done to put on the final touches.  Looking forward to the offseason for the 1st time in forever.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Yep - I think end of the day, we ended up being around a .500 team.  Underperformed for a bit, then overperformed for a bit, then ended up where we should be.  Which is still great progress, with work still to be done to put on the final touches.  Looking forward to the offseason for the 1st time in forever.

Exactly.  Great progress against great competition to just miss the cut.  We still need to raise the bar in a few places to get into the inner circle of legit contenders.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the other teams in the AL East are pretty good, probably a little better/more talented than we are just yet. I think it made me appreciate just what they accomplished as an under-talented or less-experienced bunch. 

Overall, it has been a season of great progress. We’ve seen a lot of young players and pitchers take major steps forward. The pen has been incredible, but they are running on fumes. The starters have been very good in stretches, but they have been inconsistent of late, at a critical time. The hitters have been transitional. Very good at times, and completely lost at others. Is it the humidors? is it the ball? Is it the new hitting coaches’ philosophies and practices? IDK, maybe all three. 

When the calendar changed to August, the intensity turned up. These guys learned a few valuable lessons, but they weren’t ready to compete at the top level yet. They are tired and pretty beat up at this point. Many have never played a full 162 game season. Several pitchers, since COVID, really needed to stretch out more. Not making excuses, but there is a learning curve.

I’m proud of these guys. This group has over-achieved and come a long way. Young talent has come up, a lot more on the way. We are starting to make the other teams nervous. They know the Orioles are on the road to being legitimate now. Now, they can prepare in the off season for 162 games. Elias and staff can add spend for some FA’s and make some trades. We are finally ready to compete. Perhaps we take these series in 2023. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many picked between 80 and 86 wins? I sure didn't. I questioned the pitching. It gave out - the bullpen is toast - the starters are on fumes. The offense has spells of absense with too many players who can't or won't take good at bats. Yet here we are. Six games to go. A team that has set an improvement record re won/loss. Sure, I'm disappointed we didn't do better down the stretch, but I am also proud of these guys, looking forward to 2023, and set to keep rooting over the next six.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • What would a Yates/Scherzer package cost? I'm sure the Texans will try and give it until closer to the deadline to regain some ground on the WC race, but they are 8.5 games back right now. 9th in OPS in the AL and 9th in ERA. Nothing really screams that they will go on a run to make to back. The smart move would be to trade expiring pieces.
    • I just ignore those type of responses. FIP is clearly one of the better stats to accurately rate a pitcher.   I like it better than ERA.
    • This is actually a really fascinating question. Stats give you information, but they don’t give you all the information. “intuition” or “gut feeling” is the collection of uncollated data that every experienced manager has. There are always variables that cannot be calculated and the complaint here is that Hyde apparently ignores them. About last night, I would’ve been happy for Burnes to open the inning. Hyde knows how bad the bullpen is, so it is really on him for not delaying as long as possible( IF Burnes said he was done that’s another thing.) My complaint about Hyde has always been that he leaves his starter in too long, doesn’t get a reliever up until the starter is in trouble, and doesn’t pull him until after he’s loaded the bases, and then it’s too late. This was entirely different. 15 pitches an inning is entirely manageable. But to be fair, Hyde doesn’t have a good bullpen buffet from which to choose. I just checked and Austin Voth has .2 WAR in 35 innings and Bryan Baker has negative -.02 WAR in 10 innings, a 5.91 ERA, and he’s given up 11 hits in those ten innings. I don’t understand the judgement in dumping Voth and keeping Baumann and Baker I also don’t understand Mike not moving more quickly to address this need. The price isn’t going down, so he’s either going to grit his teeth, say his prayers and do nothing, or he’s going to have to pay the going price. OR he’s going to find Fuji 2.0, and we will all scream.  
    • Thanks for the info on Sharkey and Lord. Also, you brought this up in the draft discussion, but our 16th rd OF Qrey Lott from 2023 could still be signed. I would think in a “weaker” draft as this year is viewed, and a draft that we traded a pick for Burnes, that we would want to sign him. 
    • Asset management.  The team is doing fine w/o him.  He can be brought up when rosters expand allowing tenant to hold on to Urias.  He will be up the next time there is an injury for a position player.   
    • I’d say both Holliday and Basallo are victims of their own early success and people’s tendency to get over-excited by that kind of precociousness.  Both are having very good seasons at the level they’re at, and are way ahead of schedule for players their age, yet people are disappointed that they aren’t rocketing forward at the same pace of acceleration as last year.   Holliday has a 145 wRC+ in AAA at age 20, and Basallo has a 128 OPS+ in AA at age 19.  If they need a little more time to bake at the level they’re at, that’s absolutely fine.   
    • It used to be with the old ways of voting whoever was first got the start and usually the person who came in second was a reserve and they worked around the needing a representative from every team. I wish they just did that instead of the second round head to head vote.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...