Jump to content

Tyler Wells as a starter


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Just now, RZNJ said:

It's all about his command.   When his arm is not right, like the 2nd half of last year, he doesn't have the pinpoint command.   He just needs to avoid the home runs with men on base.

It's all about command with every pitcher but Wells' command is probably his best quality as a pitcher.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's always clear on the broadcasts how highly Palmer thinks of Tyler Wells. He always speaks glowingly of Wells' command and smart pitching, more so than he does of Bradish or Kremer. And he's got a point. I think we've slept on Wells a bit here since he wasn't much of a factor in the last two months last year when we were paying the most attention. 

Edited by Spy Fox
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He and Bradish are 2 guys that I expect to give the team every chance imaginable to win when they pitch. Obviously Bradish pooped the bed last night but I don't expect that to be a normal thing for him.

 

It's really encouraging to see Wells with 7 k's and 1 walk. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The control is impeccable.

He raises his ceiling if he misses more bats and gets more Ks but the command and control keep the baserunners low. Makes him tough to beat.

And fun to watch for that reason as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

He and Bradish are 2 guys that I expect to give the team every chance imaginable to win when they pitch. Obviously Bradish pooped the bed last night but I don't expect that to be a normal thing for him.

 

It's really encouraging to see Wells with 7 k's and 1 walk. 

 

 

Before the wheels really came off, it seemed like he was a lot better htan results were showing. A few bloops fell in (including one where the batter basically threw his bat at a pitch that was low and away out of the zone). The early walks also seemed to be a lot of 50-50 balls that he just wasn't winding up on the right side of (not that he was screwed by the umps, rather that a cm or two difference would have made some of those balls into definite strikes). The real abuse happened after he'd had a 40-pitch 2nd inning, which does seem to make sense.

That's a long-winded way of saying that I think he's just a few tweaks or small differences away from that outing playing out quite differently.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Spy Fox said:

It's always clear on the broadcasts how highly Palmer thinks of Tyler Wells. He always speaks glowingly of Wells' command and smart pitching, more so than he does of Bradish or Kremer. And he's got a point. I think we've slept on Wells a bit here since he wasn't much of a factor in the last two months last year when we were paying the most attention. 

Well said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...