Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2023


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

That wasn't my question.  I don't deny that it isn't dangerous.

My question still stands.  Why would they continue to do it if it's more dangerous?

Probably similar to why people drink & drive / text & drive etc, despite common knowledge of the risks. Or why something like 90% of entrepreneurs believe their venture will succeed even though really a small fraction of them do.

Even when people know the stats, they don't think the bad outcome is going to happen to them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a positive to head first sliding otherwise teams wouldn't let their players do it.

Injuries are going to happen. No sense worrying out them. Gunnar is a gamer. I love the play.

I'm sure this is something he discussed with the staff. Someone saw something that made this a decent idea to try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was surprised, also surprised because of the batter's handedness. Stealing home happens so infrequently, I just assumed you'd do it when the batter can block the view of the catcher somewhat, or the extra step to clear the way would be one too many things to do in 3 seconds. 

He was awfully close. 

When this sort of thing happens, despite not being safe, I hope it means the other team will spend a bit more energy on caring about that - which hopefully leads to mental mistakes to the batter. Hard to quantify this, but I have no doubt baserunners who are threats create games within the game.

 

Perfectly executed by the Nats. Hats off to them.

Edited by AdamK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jdwilde1 said:

It appeared that Gunnar would have been safe but for the heads-up play by the Nat’s pitcher, Robert Garcia, as it looked like he quick-pitched after Gunnar broke for home.  The other thing to remember is that the O’s still need to close out the division and that run would have been helpful. 

Gunnar would have been safe but the pitcher accidentally threw a cutter to the catcher that tailed right into Gunnar.  If he puts the ball anywhere else he's safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's because it's easier to reach for a base/home plate with your hands than it is with your feet.  Much more easier to try and touch a corner of a bag or home plate with your fingers than a foot.  And easier to stay glued to the bag, too.

That's why they do it, despite the increased health risks.

They do it because you get there faster with a head first slide but it definitely is easier to reach for the plate/base also.   This guy thinks so to.

 

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna26975693#

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...