Jump to content

Ortiz down, Stowers up


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, waroriole said:

I don’t know what the behavior is. 

The tendency, among fans, to blame injuries for certain players' struggling (Santander, Hays, Mancini) while not giving the same leeway to others (Mountcastle, Stewart).

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Seems like a guy who plays every day and bats 3 or 4 should be capable of producing more than 1 WAR every 500 ABs. But I guess he’s just unnecessarily maligned. 

You are talking about Mountcastle here, right?   Every player has his fans who will minimize his negative traits and maximize all the positives, and his critics who do the opposite.  For me, he’s an okay player who runs very hot and cold and frustrates me at times with his lack of plate discipline.  He’s not going to be the centerpiece of a good team, but he doesn’t kill you over 162 games, either, if you ride the roller coaster with him.  Presently, he’s not hitting for power, but he’s been on base 9 games in a row.  Eventually he’ll heat up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

The tendency to blame injuries for certain players' struggling (Santander, Hays, Mancini) while not giving the same leeway to others (Mountcastle, Stewart).

I think that might just be your perception of OH. There’s plenty criticism of Hays and Santander. Of course Mancini was recovering from cancer. And I’m not aware of any Mountcastle injuries 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Who’s not going to play to make room for Stowers playing 4-5 times a week?   I hope he’ll play more than last time, but he’s not playing 4-5 times a week unless someone gets hurt. 

Santander? He’s been hitting like he’s been hurt the whole season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

He looked very comfortable. Kinda makes you wonder why we signed Adam Frazier for $8M. I hope to see more.

I still say he signed Frazier because they didn’t plan on Mateo tearing it up.  I think they wanted to move Mateo and give Henderson the SS position but they were trying to sell him for his great defensive value and speed along with his second half of the season with the bat.  They were probably trying to sell him higher then other teams saw the value of him because of poor plate discipline and poor numbers as a whole.  I think trying to trade players that show glimpses of success and talent are the hardest guys to trade because when trading them you are trying to sell the potential value to teams but they only want to pay for the value as a whole and using past struggles to pull down the value of what they will trade you.  I would bet Elias tried to move Mateo and maybe even Urias but teams didn’t offer what they thought has enough so they kept him.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waroriole said:

I think that might just be your perception of OH. There’s plenty criticism of Hays and Santander. Of course Mancini was recovering from cancer. And I’m not aware of any Mountcastle injuries 

I wasn't talking about the cancer, I'm not that gauche.  I was talking about his 2018 season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You are talking about Mountcastle here, right?   Every player has his fans who will minimize his negative traits and maximize all the positives, and his critics who do the opposite.  For me, he’s an okay player who runs very hot and cold and frustrates me at times with his lack of plate discipline.  He’s not going to be the centerpiece of a good team, but he doesn’t kill you over 162 games, either, if you ride the roller coaster with him.  Presently, he’s not hitting for power, but he’s been on base 9 games in a row.  Eventually he’ll heat up.  

My main criticism of Mountcastle is Hyde’s perception of him. He’s fine in the proper role (batting 6 or 7) and getting days off more frequently. If he’s struggling, I’d like to see more guys cycled into the lineup and Mountcastle lowered in the order when he plays. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, waroriole said:

My main criticism of Mountcastle is Hyde’s perception of him. He’s fine in the proper role (batting 6 or 7) and getting days off more frequently. If he’s struggling, I’d like to see more guys cycled into the lineup and Mountcastle lowered in the order when he plays. 

Works for me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, waroriole said:

My main criticism of Mountcastle is Hyde’s perception of him. He’s fine in the proper role (batting 6 or 7) and getting days off more frequently. If he’s struggling, I’d like to see more guys cycled into the lineup and Mountcastle lowered in the order when he plays. 

I'm fine with that, I'm just also fine with Santander being treated similarly.  He's been hitting 3rd and 4th all season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree with those who say he probably needs to figure it out in Norfolk, however, they could bring also bring him up for a look when any of Baker, Tate, or Vespi reboard the shuttle. Maybe Povich had earned the call up, whereas they don't think McDermott has done that, but bringing him up as a temporary move couldn't hurt too much for the aforementioned pitchers.
    • Big not necessarily tall is what he is saying.....Basallo is much thicker build, which actually may be better for a catcher anyway. Pudge was not thin--even before roids.
    • With this current starting pitching as is, barring an epic collapse by the Yankees, the chances of us winning the division are very low. Right now, in just about every other series (the series that Burnes and Rodriguez don't start) we are at a talent disadvantage. We have the #1 offense in all of baseball - we have scored the most runs and hit the most home runs and have scored 8, 11, and 17 in the last 3 series and we are all of 4-6 in our last 10 games. It's hard to see us being favored against even a decent team like the Mariners (with our starting pitching as is) given the talent disadvantage in the two rotations. Now we that doesn't mean that we couldn't/wouldn't pull it out. But I doubt that we would be favorites as things are going. And then when you look at a team like the Phillies with their rotation/offense/bullpen or even the Dodgers for that matter, I believe that even if we made it that far, we would be heavy underdogs against either opponent. I don't like our chances of continuously having to rely upon "beating the odds" round after round (I didn't even mention NY if we were to meet them). This is year 3 of Adley, 2 for Gunnar, and possibly our only with Burnes. Without making significant trades or major FA acquisitions, I don't see any near future scenarios where things are better for us, we have more talent or frankly a better opportunity.  Pitching injuries are so significant and so frequent in MLB now, that future projections are hazy at best. Because it is likely that you have to make pitching additions/acquisitions EVERY YEAR in order to seriously compete. If we don't make upgrades/trades this year, when will we do it? And what will be promised to us more than it is now?
    • I was wondering if you thought Coby Mayo should be brought up Roy.  
    • Cano hasn’t achieved consistent movement with his fastball, which really requires run and sink to be effective.  He’s also been hanging too many change ups.  I big part of his turn around last year was dropping to more of a sidearm delivery and his stuff gets flat when he loses that delivery slot.    
    • We need both.  My goal would be two backend bullpen arms and one starter at the deadline.  
    • I'm sorry but who cares about his walk rate. We are using Bryan Baker. We are using Suarez as a starter. We are using Vespi. We are not in a position to nitpick the guy's walk rate.  For god's sake, call up someone who has some upside. It's not like he's going to do much worse than what we have right now. And he might just go nuts out of the bullpen. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...