Jump to content

Roch: Scout talks Os and Os prospects


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

We all know Mateo has been struggling pretty bad at the plate right now but I still prefer him as our starting shortstop at least throughout the rest of the year. His defense is still pretty solid and he provides us tremendous speed and is the only true base stealer not named Mullins. I remember Ozzie Smith prior to him becoming a consistent .280 hitter was still a valuable member of the Cardinals. 
 

When we get into some close games in August, September, and hopefully October, teams will do everything they can to keep him off the bases. Having that kind of threat goes a long way! I would like to him stop swinging at the first pitch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Os4days said:

We all know Mateo has been struggling pretty bad at the plate right now but I still prefer him as our starting shortstop at least throughout the rest of the year. His defense is still pretty solid and he provides us tremendous speed and is the only true base stealer not named Mullins. I remember Ozzie Smith prior to him becoming a consistent .280 hitter was still a valuable member of the Cardinals. 
 

When we get into some close games in August, September, and hopefully October, teams will do everything they can to keep him off the bases. Having that kind of threat goes a long way! I would like to him stop swinging at the first pitch. 

I would certainly not move him for peanuts but would not cry if he were to be included in a deal for a SP.  

It's not a matter of disliking Mateo for me, quite the contrary I respect the hell out of the work he has put in to improve his offensive game. I just think his value has substantially improved, he plays a position of organizational depth, and would I would not lose my mind if the team moved him to improve the rotation. That said, will be happy also to see him on the roster at the end of the season. 

 

Edited by SteveO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, orioles22 said:

I hate any plan that turns Mateo into a "utility guy." It makes no sense to me to have him playing anywhere but short.

I like the idea of him playing Centerfield as a secondary position, like he's done before in the past. He's got the speed to cover some ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Ortiz gets most of the playing time until Mateo finally gets on a hot streak.  I assume the Analytical wizards know enough to come up with an equitable division. 

That’s not a platoon. That’s called replacing Mateo with Ortiz. I’m sure that’s under consideration by the O’s or else Ortiz would be at AAA. he appears to slowly be getting more playing time. It will be interesting to see what the O’s do when Urias comes back.

But like I said in other posts concerning this issue, either one Ortiz or Mateo are merely placeholders for Holliday. So at best, no matter which occupies the position, it is for a year at most and probably even less than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Os4days said:

We all know Mateo has been struggling pretty bad at the plate right now but I still prefer him as our starting shortstop at least throughout the rest of the year. His defense is still pretty solid and he provides us tremendous speed and is the only true base stealer not named Mullins. I remember Ozzie Smith prior to him becoming a consistent .280 hitter was still a valuable member of the Cardinals. 
 

When we get into some close games in August, September, and hopefully October, teams will do everything they can to keep him off the bases. Having that kind of threat goes a long way! I would like to him stop swinging at the first pitch. 

I remember the days of Ozzie Smith as well and would love for Mateo to turn into a hall of fame caliber player. But the problem with that logic is that was a LONG TIME ago. There have now been arguably 3 eras in the sport since the days that the Wizard was patrolling SS for the Cardinals (the steroid era, the immediate post steroid era [the one Adam Jones played in], and now the exit velo/launch angle/no shift era).

As to the bolded portion of your post, teams don't have to try that hard to keep him off the bases, he seems to have that covered pretty well himself. If he doesn't hit or has another 2/3 weeks of what he has done in the month of May, they will probably make a change.

I like you, really like Mateo and want him to succeed. But he has to be at least a threat with the bat in his hands or else the speed is irrelevant. Remember the old saying, "you can't steal first base".

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SteveO said:

I would certainly not move him for peanuts but would not cry if he were to be included in a deal for a SP.  

It's not a matter of disliking Mateo for me, quite the contrary I respect the hell out of the work he has put in to improve his offensive game. I just think his value has substantially improved, he plays a position of organizational depth, and would I would not lose my mind if the team moved him to improve the rotation. That said, will be happy also to see him on the roster at the end of the season. 

 

Whatever the month of April did to improve his value, the month of May has done the opposite to take that all away. There are still serious questions regarding his offense. That kind of player unfortunately, especially at age 27, really doesn't have much trade value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Os4days said:

We all know Mateo has been struggling pretty bad at the plate right now but I still prefer him as our starting shortstop at least throughout the rest of the year. His defense is still pretty solid and he provides us tremendous speed and is the only true base stealer not named Mullins. I remember Ozzie Smith prior to him becoming a consistent .280 hitter was still a valuable member of the Cardinals. 
 

When we get into some close games in August, September, and hopefully October, teams will do everything they can to keep him off the bases. Having that kind of threat goes a long way! I would like to him stop swinging at the first pitch. 

To steal bases, you have to be on base.  He stole 10 bases in April, but only 4 in May, for the simple reason that he hasn’t been on base much this month.  

Honestly, he will lose his starting job if he keeps hitting like this.   His slash line for May is .107/.136/.125 in 60 PA.   That is about as bad a performance over 60 PA as I’ve ever seen.  How anyone can have a 1.062 OPS one month and .261 the next is beyond my comprehension.  
 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

To steal bases, you have to be on base.  He stole 10 bases in April, but only 4 in May, for the simple reason that he hasn’t been on base much this month.  

Honestly, he will lose his starting job if he keeps hitting like this.   His slash line for May is .107/.136/.125 in 60 PA.   That is about as bad a performance over 60 PA as I’ve ever seen.  How anyone can have a 1.062 OPS one month and .261 the next is beyond my comprehension.  
 

And Frobby was here for the Chris Davis 54 at bat hitless streak  (62 plate appearances)!

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

To steal bases, you have to be on base.  He stole 10 bases in April, but only 4 in May, for the simple reason that he hasn’t been on base much this month.  

Honestly, he will lose his starting job if he keeps hitting like this.   His slash line for May is .107/.136/.125 in 60 PA.   That is about as bad a performance over 60 PA as I’ve ever seen.  How anyone can have a 1.062 OPS one month and .261 the next is beyond my comprehension.  
 

Not making excuses for him but I wonder if that hip injury has been more of a lingering thing than they have let on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

Not making excuses for him but I wonder if that hip injury has been more of a lingering thing than they have let on.

I don't think he is THIS bad, but he's definitely not the guy we had in April either. It was encouraging to see him lay off of balls early on, but his pitch recognition abilities are .... lacking. 

I prefer Joey Ortiz, honestly. I think his offensive upside far exceeds Mateo's.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mateo isn’t going anywhere but his playing time needs to be cut back.  Ortiz has shown that there is little, if any, drop off defensively when he’s in the game.   Ortiz and Urias can coexist on the same team.  Mateo can start 2-3 times a week and pinch run.   Ortiz can get the other starts at SS and the occasional game at 2B against a LHP when Urias is also spelling Gunnar at 3B.   Urías starts against all LHP and at least one start per week at 1B.   Vavra or O’Hearn are the odd man out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

I don't think he is THIS bad, but he's definitely not the guy we had in April either. It was encouraging to see him lay off of balls early on, but his pitch recognition abilities are .... lacking. 

I prefer Joey Ortiz, honestly. I think his offensive upside far exceeds Mateo's.

If Ortiz can take over the starting SS position this year that would make our 26 man so much deeper.  Having Mateo available to come in off the bench late in the game to pinch run then take over at SS and slide Ortiz over to 2B for an elite middle infield defense.  What manager wouldn't love to have that option?

I know there have been a lot of discussions around trading Mateo for pitching but I wouldn't just give him away.  I think he would be an incredible option to bring in late off the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RVAOsFan said:

If Ortiz can take over the starting SS position this year that would make our 26 man so much deeper.  Having Mateo available to come in off the bench late in the game to pinch run then take over at SS and slide Ortiz over to 2B for an elite middle infield defense.  What manager wouldn't love to have that option?

I know there have been a lot of discussions around trading Mateo for pitching but I wouldn't just give him away.  I think he would be an incredible option to bring in late off the bench.

He's definitely valuable. If he can give you a .750 OPS he's extremely valuable.

I dunno. I think I just prefer a more steady offensive threat. If he could just get on base at a .310 clip, I wouldn't be beating the drum.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I agree with that and he's only two years out of high school. If Holliday gets back to his pre-call up stat line as you mentioned then he deserves serious consideration to be back on the Orioles roster. For now Mayo and Norby are deserving of being called up if the Orioles want to bring up a player from Norfolk.
    • I just want to riff on the term “elite athlete.”   To me, different people have different ideas of what level of quality is “elite,” and what it means to be an “athlete.”    For some people, “elite” means top 10% of the whole populace, for others it means top 0.1% of people who play professional sports.   Some people consider you “athletic” if you are very well coordinated and have good ability to learn skills, others don’t consider you “athletic” unless you could hold your own in the Olympic decathlon.   So a lot of times, people arguing about whether someone is an “elite athlete” are really talking past each other because they don’t ageee on what the term means.   To me, most pro sports players are elite athletes, and it’s just a matter of how elite they are.   In the case of Holliday, he’s athletic enough to be an awesome baseball player, and that’s elite enough for me.    
    • Locked on Orioles podcast reviews 6 rental relievers (contract for only this year) who the O's could trade for. 6.  John Brebbia, White Sox 5.  Adam Ottavino, Mets 4.  Carlos Estevez, Angels 3.  Paul Sewald, D Backs 2.  Yimi Garcia, Blue Jays 1.  David Robertson, Rangers Listed in the order they appear in the video, which is also the host's view of their value--increasing to Robertson at the top.
    • https://www.fangraphs.com/players/dean-kremer/19350/splits-tool?position=P&splitArr=&splitArrPitch=&autoPt=false&splitTeams=false&statType=player&statgroup=1&startDate=2002-01-01&endDate=2024-11-01&players=&filter=&groupBy=month&wxTemperature=&wxPressure=&wxAirDensity=&wxElevation=&wxWindSpeed=&sort=-1%2C1 Bah, the link doesn't seem to be working. Go to splits, select by month and then go to advanced. 2024: Mar/Apr:  5.25 May:  4.05 July:  1.16
    • Want to sweep this series. But 2/3 isn't the end of the world.
    • Right. It’s a screwup on their part. 
    • The last column is IRS, which means “inherited runners scored”  Inherited runners would be IR and I am surprised that I didn’t see it anywhere in that column. This particular site has a different set of initials, IRS means inherited runners scored. I don’t think that can possibly be correct, because that would be a huge number.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...