Jump to content

Future owners list?


seak05

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Dan Snyder anyone?  I doubt mlb would approve him, but going San Diego style in the free agent market would keep a lot of fans excited.

Snyder would be absolutely awful.  I would much rather stay with the Angelos boys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Future owners list?  It's a very small list and all have the same last name, Angelos.  I don't like that, but I don't see them selling unless either 1) something in the estate proceedings once Peter dies makes it a necessity, 2) they are 'forced/strong armed' by MLB to sell or 3) some legal proceeding outside of the upcoming estate proceedings make them sell (see previous family fight over control, etc).  With the family fortunes slowly being deplenished and the law firm legacy that Peter built also shrinking, I expect them to hold onto the Orioles as long as they financially can do so, as it is a source of steady income for them.  I hope I'm wrong, but I don't see it getting out of the family anytime soon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be profitable for the Angelos family to sell considering Peter Angelos only paid $40 Million as part of a group (which included the noteworthy Tom Clancy) that bought the Orioles for just $173 Million.

They could make bank on that investment if they sold today.

Larry Lucchino has reportedly been previously approached about forming an ownership group that could start a negotiation with Angelos', but Larry rejected the idea saying he didn't think it was appropriate at the time.

Ted Leonisis' name was also speculated as a potential buyer before the news broke of his recent acquisition.

I think people are just speculating wildly with their imaginations when it comes to this topic. But as mentioned, the numbers don't lie... It would be profitable for the Angelos family and partners if they sold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

It would be profitable for the Angelos family to sell considering Peter Angelos only paid $40 Million as part of a group (which included the noteworthy Tom Clancy) that bought the Orioles for just $173 Million.

They could make bank on that investment if they sold today.

Larry Lucchino has reportedly been previously approached about forming an ownership group that could start a negotiation with Angelos', but Larry rejected the idea saying he didn't think it was appropriate at the time.

Ted Leonisis' name was also speculated as a potential buyer before the news broke of his recent acquisition.

I think people are just speculating wildly with their imaginations when it comes to this topic. But as mentioned, the numbers don't lie... It would be profitable for the Angelos family and partners if they sold.

It's profitable to own a team as an ongoing endeavor.  How much profit did this team generate last year?  If they sell do you think they can reinvest into something else as profitable?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's profitable to own a team as an ongoing endeavor.  How much profit did this team generate last year?  If they sell do you think they can reinvest into something else as profitable?

The interest rate on 500 million is 25 million in profit a year if they just park it in a savings account.

If the Angelo’s family actually needs cash, selling is the far better financial solution 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's profitable to own a team as an ongoing endeavor.  How much profit did this team generate last year?  If they sell do you think they can reinvest into something else as profitable?

After the difference between total expenses and revenue, the Orioles reportedly only made about little more than $14 Million in profit for the 2022 season and that was with one of the lowest payrolls in baseball. The regular overhead expenses to own a Sports/MLB franchise and operate a stadium and everything else that goes into day to day operations tend to dwarf other types of businesses.  Paying the bills can add up quickly. How expensive do you think the bills are to power a 45,000 seat stadium, attached with a operating a warehouse as part of the Organization's font office and box office management? How about the expenses associated with supporting their minor league affiliations? Then there's the food (which some is wasted from being thrown out at the end of the night), the stadium workers, the minor league staff, the major league coaching staff, the front office staff, the media staff etc... Quality baseball equipment for more than a 100+ players in an organization also isn't cheap. And then there's also the deferred salary payments and retained debt to former players that most people tend to forget about. They're still paying 5 players (including Bonilla and Davis) in deferred salaries, and then there's more retained salary of players they either bought out or traded.

And I didn't even get into all the flight, travel, and hotel expenses. Do you think it's cheap to fly a player from Norfolk across the country to Texas or San Francisco at the drop of the hat? Does the Hotel let them stay in a room for free? Didn't mention anything about all the commercials and promotions they run either. Do you think famous musicians will play the stadium for free? It costs money to attract those ticket sales too. It's an investment trade off on steroids.

All this to say is that it's a business that is magnified more than your average business. In the world of wealth, most of the reported worth of billionaires and their business is evaluated in assets, not cash. The cash isn't locked in until the sale of that estimated worth is actually made.

The real money is made over time and asset appreciation. With the drama that was reported about the family, there might not be enough time to wait a few more decades. It would be more profitable to just sell and take the profit without all the court expenses and public litigation happening over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Rutschman is probably the poster child for our increasingly free-swinging ways.  There was a little blurb in Dan Szymborski's chat regarding his free swinging ways, and Dan felt like it was a conscious decision to swing at more marginal pitches.  I took a more careful look at the swing/take data and I think the data does support that, and I think Rutschman is overall a bit more valuable swinging away at marginal pitches.   You can see the change in his swing decisions on pitches in the shadow zone.  He's actually making solid contact with these pitches at a high enough rate that it's been worth it to lose some plate discipline.
    • So you can post things about me like "Please stop talking about you.  No one gives a f*** about anything to do with your life, your bowling ball, your wife or anything else you try to pat yourself on the back about.  Your life is meaningless to the rest of us.".   And you said how dumb I am.  When I hadn't mentioned ANY of that in the post that you were responding to. Nothing.    I was talking about ORIOLES.  But I can't reply to any of that?  I never get personal until I am got personal with. You went there. I will tell you what....sports guy.  Post your pic.  Any pic. I will post mine....and I have...it is right in my avi. Because I know exactly what you look like. My guess is that you never will.   And we all know why.
    • It's a snapshot on a random day. Dodgers won 100 games last season, which was the third most in the league.
    • Somehow I had a feeling you would discount the accomplishments of a female athlete. Of course at no point did I begin to suggest they could compete against males.  That has nothing to do with how they were raised with a singular purpose to dominate in a single sport.
    • The Mariners and Dbacks made a major league trade last year of two contending teams.   The Mariners sent there closer for Josh Rojas a middle infielder and Dominic Canzone an outfielder.  Both the guys the Mariners aquired played a lot down the stretch.      I think with the exter wild cards and more teams in contention with playoffs there will be more of these type trades.  Maybe not someone as good as Seward was for the Mariners but solid relief guys for a position of need.  
    • The Williams sisters got destroyed by the 700th ranked men's tennis players in the world.  DESTROYED.  They have no chance.    Please do not compare men's and women's sports.  I played tennis my entire life, including at a Big 10 school, and the difference between men and women in sports is not EVEN in the same universe.  I would have to downsize my game 50% just so I could hit with them on a somewhat even basis.    But of course you like to make statements that are twilight zone stuff. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...