Jump to content

Magic Number !!


vab

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 344
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

On 9/9/2023 at 8:13 AM, bpilktree said:

A wild card and a trip to the World Series would be better than a division championship and lose in first round just saying.  

Absolutely.   But a division title makes the path to the World Series much easier.  And, an AL East title is a big accomplishment by itself.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Primary target is the division title, but clinching a playoff spot is an important step, as well.  We have the tie-breaker on Seattle, so our magic number to clinch a spot is 8.  We split with Texas, so our magic number with them is either 8 or 9, depending on what the second tie-breaker is.  Our magic number vs. Toronto is 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Number5 said:

Primary target is the division title, but clinching a playoff spot is an important step, as well.  We have the tie-breaker on Seattle, so our magic number to clinch a spot is 8.  We split with Texas, so our magic number with them is either 8 or 9, depending on what the second tie-breaker is.  Our magic number vs. Toronto is 9.

The MASN announcers were talking yesterday about the magic number being 5 to clinch a playoff spot. So against which team were they referring to?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

The MASN announcers were talking yesterday about the magic number being 5 to clinch a playoff spot. So against which team were they referring to?

No idea.  Seattle and Texas have 64 losses.  Toronto has 63.  Tampa Bay is well ahead of those 3, and Minnesota is the Central Division leader and not really involved in the wildcard race.  My guess is they were erroneously looking at the number for us to clinch being ahead of Minnesota, which would indeed be 5 if that number were relevant.  Its only relevance is clinching a first round bye and home field if we win the AL East and eventually play Minnesota in the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It occurs to me that since Texas and Seattle have 7 games remaining with each other, one team must lose at least 4 of them, thus reducing our basic magic number by 4.  That would make sense as to how the announcers arrived at 5.  I guess that means that the Texas magic number must be at 9.  They must have the tiebreaker on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

The MASN announcers were talking yesterday about the magic number being 5 to clinch a playoff spot. So against which team were they referring to?

Apparently, MLB sends out an update every day on the various teams and their magic number. It has to do with W/L obviously but also the remaining schedule and matchups for various teams. It sounded pretty complicated. I assume they are just going off that number. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Number5 said:

It occurs to me that since Texas and Seattle have 7 games remaining with each other, one team must lose at least 4 of them, thus reducing our basic magic number by 4.  That would make sense as to how the announcers arrived at 5.  I guess that means that the Texas magic number must be at 9.  They must have the tiebreaker on us.

We split our 6 games with Texas.   The next tiebreaker is record in your own division (even if the teams competing are in different divisions!)

Our AL East record is 28-16 (with 8 games remaining).

Their AL West record 23-19 (with 10 games remaining).

So right now, we appear to have the tiebreak with Texas.   However, if enough calamitous events occurred so that they were actually tied with us and the tiebreak mattered, we would probably have lost many of those 8 division games and they would probably have won most of theirs, and at that point they might have a better division record than us.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SteveA said:

We split our 6 games with Texas.   The next tiebreaker is record in your own division (even if the teams competing are in different divisions!)

Our AL East record is 28-16 (with 8 games remaining).

Their AL West record 23-19 (with 10 games remaining).

So right now, we appear to have the tiebreak with Texas.   However, if enough calamitous events occurred so that they were actually tied with us and the tiebreak mattered, we would probably have lost many of those 8 division games and they would probably have won most of theirs, and at that point they might have a better division record than us.

Makes sense, and since the tie-breaker with Texas is not yet decided, we can't consider that game in hand for us, thereby giving us a magic number of 5, rather than 4.  In any case, the fact that Texas has so many games let with Seattle, our odds of clinching a playoff spot are really, really good.  Gotta be on the order of 99% plus.  Tampa Bay and Toronto are helped out by the Seattle-Texas schedule big-time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Like I said the other day, it would be nice to hear from some scouts, the org or whoever about all the walks, lack of power, lack of BA, etc…is he tweaking things? Is the elbow bothering him to where he can’t drive the ball? Is he getting nothing to hit?     I’m surprised someone from the Banner hasn’t gotten into this because it’s obviously a big story and one that should be reported on.  
    • One thing to note is that Jackson made swing tweaks his first three weeks back in Norfolk but then abandoned them because they “didn’t feel great”. From this Baltimore Banner article:  “Earlier, as he fiddled, Holliday felt he was “surviving” and “didn’t feel great” about where his swing was, even though he produced at the Triple-A level upon his return. That has since changed. Over the last two weeks, particularly, Holliday’s return to the mechanics he’s more familiar with has helped him get back on track.” His contact rate really dropped off when he reverted back to his familiar mechanics. I worry that he gave up on the changes too soon. First three weeks back vs. after (includes tracked pitches and non-bunts)   PAs    K%           wOBA  xwOBA whiff % 4/27-5/18 91 19.8% .366 .349 21.6% 5/19-7/2 118 28.8% .392 .337 32.1%     PAs    EV      hard hit % barrel/PA 4/27-5/18 91 89.5 44.4% 4.4% 5/19-7/2 118 89.8 44.6% 4.2%
    • Sure. And his ligaments would have likely snapped, and he'd have put that college degree to good use instead of being a ballplayer. Or he would have thrown at 90% like most everyone else and topped out with Cedar Rapids in the Three-I League.
    • Let's say you allow the sticky stuff. The guys whose sweeper breaks 10" might now see it break 12". You think they're going to grip the ball more loosely, throw with a little less effort, get hurt less, and be content with a 10" sweeper?  No! They're going to grip the hell out of the ball and use the sticky stuff and try to get a 15" sweeper. And they'll keep getting hurt just as much. It couldn't be more clear that almost every pitcher and every coach and every team chooses the high-risk, high-reward path. You can't put the genie back in the bottle.
    • I guarantee you that if Christy could only get guys out by using his best stuff he would have.  
    • I'm going to guess that in the olden days there was a weeding out that happened before most kids played an organized baseball game. Many, many kids played baseball all day long in the summer, and many, many of them tore up their elbow or shoulder at 11 or 13 or whatever and never pitched on a high school or other team. And nobody was Drivelining anyone. Part of the philosophy of pitching was you don't throw as hard as you possibly can because it hurts and you'll ruin your arm. A few people got away with throwing near max effort, but most couldn't. And there was a very stong stigma to coming out of a game, so pitchers knew they'd be shamed and mocked if they threw until it really hurt and had to come out. In the 1910's Christy Mathewson (or a ghostwriter) wrote Pitching in a Pinch, where he explicitly said that using your best stuff except when you really needed to was stupid.  Smoltz is a guy who idiotically venerates the past, making the era where he came up into some kind of golden nirvana. But, he is right that the driving factor in injuries today is that everyone throws at 110% of rated capacity all the time. It's just a matter of time until something tears.  The problem is that there is no simple solution, since throwing at 110% is simply more effective than throwing at 90%. 90% gets you (essentially) limitless innings. But 110% makes your ERA half a run or a run lower (numbers made up for illustration). And it couldn't be more clear that when $millions and wins are on the line, essentially everyone picks the lower ERA over the more innings. An average MLB pitcher has an ERA in the mid-4s. If he backs it off to 90% so he can pitch into the 8th or 9th, he'll likely have an ERA in the mid-5s, which puts him in AAA. The difference between pacing and pitching until it breaks is often the difference between $7M a year and $70k a year.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...