Jump to content

One key to Orioles success


brucewayne

Recommended Posts

Tools are all the rage in modern baseball. Everybody wants that guy with the cannon arm, who is 6'4" and can run like a track star and launch 500 foot homeruns. All good stuff, but that's not how a ball player makes his mark long term. Baseball is about hitting the ball. The hit tool is by far the most important skill any position player can have. Bat to ball skills is what makes or breaks you at the MLB level. Taken to the extreme you can literally be a HOF player with just 1 tool above average. There are players int the HOF who can't do much other than hit. If your hit tool is great and you have 20HR type power then you are literally HOF, damn the other tools. 

 

I'm not saying it's great to be slow or mediocre in the field. I'm saying that tools are flashy, but bat on ball skills is what really matters. We took Kjerstad #2 overall in what most consider a reach because he's not "toolsy" enough for that slot. We took Holliday #1 overall when everybody else had Druw Jones going #1. Why? Because Jones is bigger, faster, stronger with a cannon arm. Good for him. Guess what? Jackson can hit and Druw can't. Holliday broke the all time record for high school hits. The previous record holder? JT Realmuto. How is JT doing? I'd say pretty damn good. Rutschman was taken #1 overall and we took him over Witt. I like that decision. Catcher is the most important position on the field and Rutschman can put the bat on the ball. I like the decision to take guy who can put the bat on the ball.

 

We have taken some high risk, high upside picks recently like Beavers and Bradfield. Guys who profile as toolsy instead of natural hitters. That said, you can afford to take a little more risk when you've already established a core pipeline of hitting talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brucewayne said:

Tools are all the rage in modern baseball. Everybody wants that guy with the cannon arm, who is 6'4" and can run like a track star and launch 500 foot homeruns. All good stuff, but that's not how a ball player makes his mark long term. Baseball is about hitting the ball. The hit tool is by far the most important skill any position player can have. Bat to ball skills is what makes or breaks you at the MLB level. Taken to the extreme you can literally be a HOF player with just 1 tool above average. There are players int the HOF who can't do much other than hit. If your hit tool is great and you have 20HR type power then you are literally HOF, damn the other tools. 

 

I'm not saying it's great to be slow or mediocre in the field. I'm saying that tools are flashy, but bat on ball skills is what really matters. We took Kjerstad #2 overall in what most consider a reach because he's not "toolsy" enough for that slot. We took Holliday #1 overall when everybody else had Druw Jones going #1. Why? Because Jones is bigger, faster, stronger with a cannon arm. Good for him. Guess what? Jackson can hit and Druw can't. Holliday broke the all time record for high school hits. The previous record holder? JT Realmuto. How is JT doing? I'd say pretty damn good. Rutschman was taken #1 overall and we took him over Witt. I like that decision. Catcher is the most important position on the field and Rutschman can put the bat on the ball. I like the decision to take guy who can put the bat on the ball.

 

We have taken some high risk, high upside picks recently like Beavers and Bradfield. Guys who profile as toolsy instead of natural hitters. That said, you can afford to take a little more risk when you've already established a core pipeline of hitting talent.

Good post, and got me thinking. Could the Orioles be the team that swings the pendulum back from the current home run or bust mindset of the league? They are certainly bucking the trend in many ways, and it remains to be seen if other teams will attempt to mimic this model going forward. That would be different for us Os fans!!!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IPlayGM said:

Good post, and got me thinking. Could the Orioles be the team that swings the pendulum back from the current home run or bust mindset of the league? They are certainly bucking the trend in many ways, and it remains to be seen if other teams will attempt to mimic this model going forward. That would be different for us Os fans!!!

Timely hitting, situational baseball and a lockdown back end of the bullpen. How are the Os doing it? There is the answer. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea that we have a “lockdown” bullpen is pretty laughable.  The bullpen’s save rate is 61%, below the AL average of 62%.  

What we really have is a tenacious offense that doesn’t get down on itself when the bullpen gives up a lead.  They go out and get it right back.   We’ve won almost half the games in which our bullpen blew a save, which is remarkable. 
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The idea that we have a “lockdown” bullpen is pretty laughable.  The bullpen’s save rate is 61%, below the AL average of 62%.  

What we really have is a tenacious offense that doesn’t get down on itself when the bullpen gives up a lead.  They go out and get it right back.   We’ve won almost half the games in which our bullpen blew a save, which is remarkable. 
 

Yea, I would like to see us replace several members of the pen right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Honestly, Felix is the only guy I fully trust, and even he has hiccups a little more often than I’d like.  

Oxymoron: "fully trust" / "a little more often than I'd like"

But I hear you. I think I myself was spoiled by Zach Britton and before him Jim Johnson (during only some of their years of crse).

Edited by LA2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Honestly, Felix is the only guy I fully trust, and even he has hiccups a little more often than I’d like.  

Yea..I mean for me, I’m hoping for Hall and Wells for sure.  Means plays some role, although that role is tbd.

You then have a guy like Baker..how is he coming along? Can he get it going?

And like I said before, I’m not ruling out McDermott for the pen this season. A power arm like his in short stints could be huge and it’s not unusual to see a scenario like that play out for a contender.

We could drop many members of the pen tomorrow and I don’t think most of us would bat an eye. I know it would be unusual to do that in September heading into the playoffs but outside of Bautista, cano and Coloumbe, we have not had any real consistency out there.

Baumann has done an adequate job in his role but it’s been nothing special.

No one else has remotely stood out.

 

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The idea that we have a “lockdown” bullpen is pretty laughable.  The bullpen’s save rate is 61%, below the AL average of 62%.  

What we really have is a tenacious offense that doesn’t get down on itself when the bullpen gives up a lead.  They go out and get it right back.   We’ve won almost half the games in which our bullpen blew a save, which is remarkable. 
 

Dont we lead the league in bullpen WAR? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think he was talking about Ryan Mountcastle but I can understand the pivot.  It’s like the Elvin Hayes turn around bank shot.  It’s always there when you need it.  😀
    • Suarez minor league deal. Cole Sulser. Cesar Valdez. Jorge Lopez. There's a ton, even if some only work out for one year or so.  I think what happens is people look at this year and the lack of waiver/small trade/minor league deal success stories, which is true. Elias hasn't found that guy on waivers or trades this year... yet. 
    • If Urias and/or Mateo are released or traded, then Norby becomes important depth at both 2B and as a right-handed bat on a team with mostly lefty hitters. Norby is certainly a candidate to be traded himself, but I value him significantly more than any of Urias, Mateo, AND Hays, and Elias should as well. Other major league teams would certainly offer more in a trade for Norby than they would for Hays (and certainly also Mateo and Urias). So we should value him similarly. If there are no takers for Norby on the trade market, he has good value to the Orioles' major league roster later this season. Once Mayo is promoted, Norby's ability to play both corner OF spots and 2B with a quality righty bat actually makes him more valuable to this team than any of Mateo, Urias, McKenna, or Hays coming off the bench previously.  An eventual bench of Norby, Mullins as the 4th OF, and Billy Cook would be very strong and versatile. That's the bench of a team with the best offense in baseball, and one that can win a World Series even without a great pitching staff.
    • Norby plays a valuable role in serving as a liaison and tour guide for the greater Norfolk area when players get promoted to the Tides.
    • Oh, and I don't disagree with that (the pitch clock is one of my favorite rule changes for hitters and pitchers alike), but the idea that putting a runner at second to shorten the game is what I don't like. Was an extra inning game something that happened often enough to extend the overall average time of play? Maybe, but I don't like that rule. Yes, the 5-4 game in 2:15 is preferable for sure, but burning through bullpens and calling up players from the minors is also part of team management and the inner workings of the game which I enjoy. Who's really a good in game manager and also works with the GM to manage the 40 man? Maybe that part of it is lost on many, but the runner at 2B is one of my least favorite changes despite your bedtime preferences! And while I also like the pitch clock, limiting the pitcher to two throws (disengagements) is ridiculous.  
    • Back to the OP, I don't find much to quibble about re: the grades at all. I might lean towards that B or even B- for Cowser rather than the B+, but it's splitting hairs. He's been able to avoid an absolute bottoming-out pretty much any time he gets close, so he's staying just productive enough for a rookie. It feels like he's stepped it up since Kjerstad came up, and no I'm not drawing any silly conclusions there. Just a coincidence. But it's incredible if they can both be productive on the same roster.   
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...