Jump to content

As of now, which non-pitcher position are you the most concerned about?


Greg Pappas

As of now, which non-pitcher position are you the most concerned about?  

71 members have voted

  1. 1. As of now, which non-pitcher position are you the most concerned about?



Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

Your answer doesn't necessarily indicate a major concern, but rather the most concern.  (BTW, I get that DH isn't technically a position) 🙂

Is none of the above possible?  😇

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say 3B because it's really the only position that we don't have a clear answer for.  We have people that can play there, but they are perceived bench players, prospects, or Gunnar.  I still think best option is Gunnar at 3B, Ortiz at SS until Holiday is up.  Westburg at 2B.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Left field for me. Hays’ jumps have never been spectacular, and he’s another year older. Compare:

Hays in 2023:

Reaction: -1.1

Burst: -.7

Route: .4

Feet vs Average: -1.4

Feet covered: 32.2

Santander in 2023:

Reaction: -.7

Burst: .1

Route: .7

Feet vs Average: .1

Feet covered: 33.2

Hays was certainly above average offensively last year with a 114 OPS+ (even with the second half decline), but I think that might be his peak. If the offense declines, and the defense further declines, I feel like LF could be the most troubling position (which is why I’d strongly consider moving Hays if a team valued him).

I wouldn’t call LF a major concern despite the foregoing. However, because I didn’t want to choose none of the above, I am choosing LF.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going with CF. I love Ceddy but his production isn't exactly tracking upward. You can hide the bat if he plays exceptional defense but what happens when that slips? EBJ might have to be ready sooner than we hoped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mullins for sure. He had a bunch of injuries and looked pretty broken down at the end of the year, to the point of looking Cowser level bad in the playoffs. His .721 OPS was OK overall but he was headed in the wrong direction and just overall seems on a downward trend since that crazy 1st half of 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, cridolphi said:

I'd say 3B because it's really the only position that we don't have a clear answer for.  We have people that can play there, but they are perceived bench players, prospects, or Gunnar.  I still think best option is Gunnar at 3B, Ortiz at SS until Holiday is up.  Westburg at 2B.  

If things get really bad, we could just have our Gold Glove third baseman play third base. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am concerned about Mullins offensive production. To me he just seems to wear down as the season progresses and I'm worried about him not aging well. Those that are concerned about Hays...IMO he is what he is and may be the least likely to have a drastic change offensively in either direction. McKenna?? I will be disappointed if he is on the opening day roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not very worried about any of them.  But, I’d say our biggest potential weakness is 1B, because Mountcastle is inconsistent and O’Hearn may be a one-year fluke, based on his track record.   But it also wouldn’t surprise me if Mountcastle had a career year.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I’m not very worried about any of them.  But, I’d say our biggest potential weakness is 1B, because Mountcastle is inconsistent and O’Hearn may be a one-year fluke, based on his track record.   But it also wouldn’t surprise me if Mountcastle had a career year.  

Yeah, but you could just put Santander or Kjerstad (or Mayo) there.  There are options.

It's why I went with CF.  Besides Mullins, there aren't any good options.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's been a couple months, let's check in on where things sit. Tony's ranking in parentheses: Locks: 1. Coby Mayo (3) - Stud. He won't need to wait till the winter. 2. Cade Povich (5) - Bad start last night but 3.85 xFIP in AAA this year, he's looked really good. 3. Chayce McDermott (8): 14.36 K/9 in Norfolk but 5.74 BB/9 too.  4. Connor Norby (10): .386 wOBA, .309 xwOBA this year - I'm not a fan but he still gets added More Likely Than Not: 5. Brandon Young (26): The move to Norfolk proves they think he's for real. He has the best xFIP in the org (2.17) He hasn't thrown 5 innings in an outing yet though. They're still being cautious with him. 6. Kade Strowd (20): 2.88 xFIP and got bumped to Norfolk. He has a real shot to get added. He could be bullpen depth this year even. Other Names to Watch: Trey McGough - LHP, got bumped to Norfolk. 3.78 xFIP there so far. Luis Gonzalez - 32 year old Mexican league find like Suarez, Cesar Valdez, Miguel Gonzalez, but he'll get a cup of coffee this year the way he's pitching. 3.43 xFIP in 22 IP inNorfolk. Maverick Handley - .246/.357/.396 in Norfolk and reportedly has a strong arm. Do they trade for Blake Hunt if they like Handley to replace McCann next year?  Nick Richmond - Strong numbers in Bowie to start the year, 3.34 xFIP Eligible, but Not Playing Well Enough for Consideration: Hudson Haskin, Billy Cook, Justin Armbreuster, Keagan Gillies, John Rhodes, Carter Baumler, Kyle Brnovich, Moises Chace, Wandisson Charles, Carlos Tavera
    • Elias has so many factors to contemplate in consideration of trade acquisitions.  Among them is how he foresees the 2025 roster (and beyond) and whether trading a player or prospect away will affect that roster.  Luzardo would fit in very well, as we'd have him this year and two more, helping to offset the loss of Burnes after this season. Is it potentially worth losing six years of control of multiple prospects?  It was worth losing Ortiz and Hall and all their years of control for one season of Burnes.  Such considerations make for an interesting aspect of determining who to target and knowing what your max offer would be.  Being on the same page with the other team's GM may still find you on the outside looking in if another team ups their offer enough to outbid you. I'd be in heaven to be able to be with Elias as he has these conversations and to see how he views things. 
    • Randy Arozarena is another example of the surprise and unpredictability of the game. In his breakout years of 2019-2020, he had pretty scary stats, albeit with limited plate appearances. High average, and OPS+ of 135 and 182 respectively. Yikes! Since then, he's had 3 full ML years under his belt -- 2021, 2022 and 2023. He got slightly worse each year according to OPS+ (129, 123, 120) but that's not a huge backslide. 2022 was a big doubles year for him, then in 2023 he hit more home runs and fewer doubles. Last year he was a .254 hitter with 23 home runs, 19 doubles and 3 triples. With a 120 OPS+, he's still a major league piece you would want in a lineup. Then there's this year. In 230 PA -- about a third of a season -- he has shown a huge dropoff in hits. He's on pace to get about the same number of doubles and home runs as last year, but about 50 fewer hits. His OPS+ is half of last year's, and worse than ML average at 65. In recent years, he's been a batter I've dreaded to see at the plate against the O's. But this year, he's showing signs of Chris Davis syndrome with the batting average falling off a cliff. Perhaps not coincidentally, the Rays are not where they'd like to be at this point in the season with a losing record. Baseball is weird.
    • Love Cole Irvin as the guy who can move around a pitching staff and I'd be fine with him as the 4th/5th starter.   If you can get a guy and bump him into the spot starter/long man role, he will benefit this team more.
    • The #RisingTide doesn't stop when it starts inundating higher value MLB careers. It is an important decision for the Orioles to get right how many from 0-4 out of Heston Kjerstad, Coby Mayo, Jackson Holliday and Samuel Basallo ought to appear in an October 2024 lineup.     This is likely the singular season Corbin Burnes and Samuel Basallo can contribute cWPA to Baltimore. With about half the year to year player fluctuations and injury results in view, you can kind of MadLib the Orioles old outfielders that might still be unconstrained starters on other contenders with LF-CF-RF WAA weaknesses, and a medium strong middle reliever on those teams where maybe there is a 2024 balanced Bat for Arm situation. RF Santander back to Cleveland for Scott Barlow? CF Mullins to LA Dodgers for Daniel Hudson and/or Blake Treinen? LF Hays to Minnesota for Jorge Alcala?
    • IMHO there is close to a zero chance the O's would deal Mayo for Luzardo.  I have doubts we'd trade for him at all, but especially when names like Mayo come up.  Holliday, Mayo, and Basallo are top tier prospects (and Kjerstad is another highly rated one) but Luzardo, while very good, is not worth a top tier prospect, yet.  If he stays healthy and looks great, that could change, but even then, not for our Top 3.  If the Marlins could net Kjerstad in their package I'd call that a win for them, but his inclusion also seems unlikely. To be clear, I'd love to add Luzardo, but like most trade ideas, what we'd give up would have to be agreeable.
    • The very concept is baffling  You are supposed to hit a round ball with an oblong bat and hit it Square.  That is very hard to do  No wonder only a very small % of people on the planet can do it very good.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...