Jump to content

2024 Prospect Power Rankings


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

@Tony-OH This is a tough question to preface, but would it be fair in your estimation to say the following players have either been disappointing as Top 5 Round draft picks (2019-2022), or at least unlikely to ever be productive major leaguers? 

  • Zach Watson (2019 3rd round) No longer with the organization?
  • Hudson Haskin (2020 2nd round)
  • Anthony Servideo (2020 3rd round)
  • Reed Trimble (2021 2nd round)
  • John Rhodes (2021 3rd round)
  • Donta Williams (2021 4th round)
  • Max Wagner (2022 2nd round)
  • Silas Ardoin (2022 4th round)

To be clear, I love what Elias has done as GM.  I have, however, noticed a pattern of his taking college bats after Round 1 that have mostly not amounted to much. 
From 2019, 2nd rounder Kyle Stowers has made it to the big leagues, though he's not that highly considered.  Still, a solid 2nd round pick and one that could play in the league for some years to come as a reserve. 
Also from 2019 is 4th rounder Joey Ortiz, who was a great pick that helped us net Corbin Burnes.
I thought about including Jud Fabian, a 2022 2nd rounder, but feel there is still hope he'll be able to contribute.

I'd much prefer to see higher upside HS bats get more in the mix in these early rounds.

Anyway, I'd love your input on this, as I may be missing something or just being a bit unfair in my critique of these picks. Thanks.


 

Edited by Greg Pappas
Misspelled Rhodes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

@Tony-OHThis is a tough question to preface, but would it be fair in your estimation to say the following players have either been disappointing as Top 5 Round draft picks (2019-2022), or at least unlikely to ever be productive major leaguers? 

  • Zach Watson (2019 3rd round) No longer with the organization?
  • Hudson Haskin (2020 2nd round)
  • Anthony Servideo (2020 3rd round)
  • Reed Trimble (2021 2nd round)
  • John Rhoades (2021 3rd round)
  • Donta Williams (2021 4th round)
  • Max Wagner (2022 2nd round)
  • Silas Ardoin (2022 4th round)

To be clear, I love what Elias has done as GM.  I have, however, noticed a pattern of his taking college bats after Round 1 that have mostly not amounted to much. 
From 2019, 2nd rounder Kyle Stowers has made it to the big leagues, though he's not that highly considered.  Still, a solid 2nd round pick and one that could play in the league for some years to come as a reserve. 
Also from 2019 is 4th rounder Joey Ortiz, who was a great pick that helped us net Corbin Burnes.
I thought about including Jud Fabian, a 2022 2nd rounder, but feel there is still hope he'll be able to contribute.

I'd much prefer to see higher upside HS bats get more in the mix in these early rounds.

Anyway, I'd love your input on this, as I may be missing something or just being a bit unfair in my critique of these picks. Thanks.


 

I think if you look at the drafts from those 2nd and 3rd rounds you are going to see most teams miss more than they hit. I would like to see Elias take more high school players in the top 5 rounds since he's had pretty good success (Gunnar, Hernaiz, Mayo), but if you look at those rounds you can see lots of HS busts as well. 

 Elias has obviously hit pretty well, but he's going to miss more than he hits because that's just the nature of the draft.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of guys on that list have also just had a very hard time staying healthy.  Haskin has done some good things but missed a lot of time.  Servideo missed a lot of time.  Ardoin actually has had a decent career so far for a 4th rounder.

Reed Trimble is another guy that just can't stay on the field.  Looks like he made it about 2 weeks this year before going on the IL yet again.  Not sure what the injury is (yes RZ I did google it :))

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of it hasn't been his fault, but the sand does feel mostly out of the hourglass for Haskin becoming a $2 million draft pool dollar total loss.

To be clear, Elias' team's overall success rate has been Stephen Curry levels of brilliant such that it looks fairly likely today the 2023-2030 Orioles will run circles around the other 29 Clubs at position player WAR, so searching for an expensive bust is kind of a humblebrag parlor game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/29/2024 at 5:35 PM, Greg Pappas said:

@Tony-OHThis is a tough question to preface, but would it be fair in your estimation to say the following players have either been disappointing as Top 5 Round draft picks (2019-2022), or at least unlikely to ever be productive major leaguers? 

  • Zach Watson (2019 3rd round) No longer with the organization?
  • Hudson Haskin (2020 2nd round)
  • Anthony Servideo (2020 3rd round)
  • Reed Trimble (2021 2nd round)
  • John Rhoades (2021 3rd round)
  • Donta Williams (2021 4th round)
  • Max Wagner (2022 2nd round)
  • Silas Ardoin (2022 4th round)

To be clear, I love what Elias has done as GM.  I have, however, noticed a pattern of his taking college bats after Round 1 that have mostly not amounted to much. 
From 2019, 2nd rounder Kyle Stowers has made it to the big leagues, though he's not that highly considered.  Still, a solid 2nd round pick and one that could play in the league for some years to come as a reserve. 
Also from 2019 is 4th rounder Joey Ortiz, who was a great pick that helped us net Corbin Burnes.
I thought about including Jud Fabian, a 2022 2nd rounder, but feel there is still hope he'll be able to contribute.

I'd much prefer to see higher upside HS bats get more in the mix in these early rounds.

Anyway, I'd love your input on this, as I may be missing something or just being a bit unfair in my critique of these picks. Thanks.


 

Almost seems like you read my post in the draft section on Wednesday afternoon.

”Fair point.  Stowers, Watson, Ortiz, Trimble, Rhodes, Donta Williams, Haskin, Servideo, Fabian, Wagner, Ardoin,  are all college position players taken in rounds 2-4.   Maybe Stowers and Fabian carve out a part time role as ML players.   We’ve done well at the top of the draft with this demographic but Ortiz is the only college position player after round that looks like starting material.  The two best of this group, Ortiz and Stowers were taken back in 2019.   We haven’t done so well since then.”

The 2023 draft will be interesting to follow.  Horvath is a power guy off to a bad start.  They went with more pitching with Baumeister and Lord and went with a bunch of guys who could play CF.”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

A lot of guys on that list have also just had a very hard time staying healthy.  Haskin has done some good things but missed a lot of time.  Servideo missed a lot of time.  Ardoin actually has had a decent career so far for a 4th rounder.

Reed Trimble is another guy that just can't stay on the field.  Looks like he made it about 2 weeks this year before going on the IL yet again.  Not sure what the injury is (yes RZ I did google it :))

Glenn, you’re a very good poster but apparently a bad Googler.  No problemo.  This was reported April 26.

Injuries: MASN’s Steve Melewski reported that Bowie’s Zach Peek (right shoulder inflammation) and Aberdeen’s Reed Trimble (right hamstring discomfort) were both placed on the injured list yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Almost seems like you read my post in the draft section on Wednesday afternoon.

”Fair point.  Stowers, Watson, Ortiz, Trimble, Rhodes, Donta Williams, Haskin, Servideo, Fabian, Wagner, Ardoin,  are all college position players taken in rounds 2-4.   Maybe Stowers and Fabian carve out a part time role as ML players.   We’ve done well at the top of the draft with this demographic but Ortiz is the only college position player after round that looks like starting material.  The two best of this group, Ortiz and Stowers were taken back in 2019.   We haven’t done so well since then.”

The 2023 draft will be interesting to follow.  Horvath is a power guy off to a bad start.  They went with more pitching with Baumeister and Lord and went with a bunch of guys who could play CF.”

I hadn't read that, but it seems we are thinking similar things. 😃  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

@Tony-OH Luis Almeyda keeps steadily rising?  What am I missing?  I saw he had a pretty good last week of May.  Leads me To believe that maybe you e heard something about him from one of your sources.  

More like other guys keep falling. lol

He's been doing ok overall of late and I've heard the tools are good, but we'll see. He has not been overly impressive so far in his pro career but he's still young. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Glad to see Stiven Acevedo make the list!  I have high hopes for him.  He’s been on a heater and his numbers are starting to garner some attention.  

Acevedo has been my under dog guy for a bit. He just looks like a ball player and has some nice tools, but he needs to keep this hot streak going and add some power.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

More like other guys keep falling. lol

He's been doing ok overall of late and I've heard the tools are good, but we'll see. He has not been overly impressive so far in his pro career but he's still young. 

Thanks.  I was hoping you weren’t going to say that but had a feeling that was the case. 
 

Agree on Acevedo - he looks the part.  You can’t teach his size and speed and athleticism.  I hope he keeps it up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

More like other guys keep falling. lol

He's been doing ok overall of late and I've heard the tools are good, but we'll see. He has not been overly impressive so far in his pro career but he's still young. 

I was going tonask the general trend in the muddled middle too...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Difference in trading vets from a team still in rebuild mode versus trading vets from a team with World Series aspirations.  We've not seen him trade vets since the rebuild ended.
    • Understood. But here's the thing (given the current economic structure of the game) there are three ways to handle payroll for a winning team (as I see them). One is the Rays/Brewers/Guardians way. Where you have maybe one long term substantive contract (mostly done while player is young and before he has made real money or achieved real fame) and most of the time the contract is an exploitive type deal with a kid from another country who comes from a context of poverty (not judging it is what it is). These teams continuously are reloading/retooling/ and have constant roster reshaping and turnover. The goal is to make the postseason and hopeful every once in a blue moon the stars align while you are there and you may be able to go all the way! While these teams are often good, they are rarely great. And are even less willing to do what it takes to get them over the top IMO. The proof is in the fact that this model has never led to championship success (unless you want to use the Marlins of over 20 years ago from 03'). Another model is the "big spenders model", who spend seriously and have World Series aspirations. Some spend all on FA (like the Padres/Mets) and are super aggressive with trades hoping to augment their talent as they chase championships, but rarely does this work because the foundation of the team is usually built so poorly. They may be good for a season or shorter term but struggle to sustain. Then there are teams like the Phillies/Dodgers who do a combo of developing and spending (let's call that the best of both worlds). Obviously this is the most preferable because you get the short and long term rewards. But it may not be realistic to think that the O's could ever do/have what it takes to fully do both. Then there is the Braves and Astros model. Still a higher payroll but minimizing of risks through extending younger players (Braves) or avoiding most long term contracts (Astros) but paying higher salaries on shorter deals. Obviously both franchises have been successful (won WS). Having said all this the reality exists that if/when you do longer term contracts (extensions or FA deals) for franchise/cornerstone/superstar type players, you most likely won't get the best value on the back end (think Paul Goldschmidt this year). That's just the economics of the game. But the thing is, the owners (especially our new group) have the money and then some to write off those things and keep rolling as "the cost of doing business".  When examining all winners of the World Series in the last decade a pattern is pretty apparent (with exception of the Astros first championship in 17') you have to spend in order to win. 
    • An alternative... also from the Rangers:  Nathan Eovaldi.  FA after this season but has a $20m vesting option for 2025 if he throws 300 innings combined between '23 & '24.  It'll be close.  Between Scherzer (40 this month) and Eovaldi (34) who would you prefer? 
    • That's a fair assessment.  I wouldn't be willing to give up a whole lot for him but I'd at least inquire rather than just dismissing the possibility out of hand based on what he did last year (which is not what you were doing). 
    • Really interesting article on Brecht by Mellissa Lockhart in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5606772/2024/07/03/brody-brecht-mlb-draft-iowa-football-baseball/ Sounds like a kid who is super coachable.  "Brecht has big-league stuff, but questions remain about whether he can command his arsenal well enough to be effective against major-league hitters, especially in a starter’s role. Law noted in his mock draft that Brecht is “a college pitcher who’s less polished than his peers, with athleticism and arm strength that point to more upside.” Heller says major-league organizations only have to look at the improvements Brecht made from his sophomore to junior season to see how much room there is for him to continue to grow as a pitcher. “It shows you the aptitude that Brody has and the ability to make adjustments and change,” Heller said. “Not everybody has that. It’s not easy to do and Brody did it in a very short time.”  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...