Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2024


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, yark14 said:

Gehrig also rode on trains during road trips and sports medicine didn't really exist.

There were also 28 scheduled double headers in 1938. Hard to compare because the eras were so different. Both streaks clearly super freakish. 

 

p.s. Apparently there were 41 scheduled double headers in 1941, but Gehrig was done by then. 

Edited by Ohfan67
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Say O! said:

Gunnar’s D has been spectacular this year and firmly cemented his status as the SS of the present and future. 

That was a great play, but I was more impressed by Mateo's back-up, turn and throw play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gunnar now has 2 hits (2/53) in all of the losses combined. His batting average is .037.  Of course you would expect his average to be lower in losses but this seems rather extraordinary.  Mountcastle, who I randomly checked is hitting .244 in losses.  Even Mullins, who is barely at .200 overall, is hitting .135 (5/37). 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, baltfan said:

Gunnar now has 2 hits (2/53) in all of the losses combined. His batting average is .037.  Of course you would expect his average to be lower in losses but this seems rather extraordinary.  Mountcastle, who I randomly checked is hitting .244 in losses.  Even Mullins, who is barely at .200 overall, is hitting .135 (5/37). 

Good post.

 

Yeah I have noticed he has been really REALLY cold in almost all of the Os loses.  When he hits the Os seem to win most of the time.

 

When he doesn't hit?  They lose almost all of the time.  Odd to see a team so reliant on one player the Os are with Gunnar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, baltfan said:

Gunnar now has 2 hits (2/53) in all of the losses combined. His batting average is .037.  Of course you would expect his average to be lower in losses but this seems rather extraordinary.  Mountcastle, who I randomly checked is hitting .244 in losses.  Even Mullins, who is barely at .200 overall, is hitting .135 (5/37). 

Santander is at .093.  But yeah, that seems really extraordinary.  I assume it won’t come close to holding up over a full season.  Last year, among our players with 100 PA in losses, nobody hit worse than .170 (Mullins).  Gunnar was at .179.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh I think it just highlights how good the pitching has been in those losses. If we lose, it's usually because we are facing someone having an extremely good pitching performance - good enough that Gunnar is shut down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, clapdiddy said:

Yup.   It was only a matter of time.  

I do believe it's also a matter of time before his toe starts giving him issues or he pulls/strains something else while roaming the outfield.

I like Aaron Judge so I'm not rooting for him to get injured.  It just sucks that he plays for the Yankees but he's a fantastic player and seems like a good dude.  It's overall a net positive for the game of baseball to have someone like that.

He's still certainly dangerous but it wouldn't surprise me if after two seasons of over 1.000 OPS that he's reached his peak and he's entering a decline.  I don't think he'll ever be as bad as Stanton but I do think he's entering a stage of his career where he might be more injury prone.

Of course this is now a reverse lock.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, interloper said:

Eh I think it just highlights how good the pitching has been in those losses. If we lose, it's usually because we are facing someone having an extremely good pitching performance - good enough that Gunnar is shut down. 

It's the opposite of when a couple of years ago ESPN, as I recall, showed a graphic about the Yankees' amazing record in games where Brett Gardner hit a home run. They were trying to make it sound like Gardner was a magic sparkplug for the team, and I couldn't believe how dumb it was even for ESPN. Come on, if the pitching is bad enough that Brett Gardner is taking them deep, then of course the rest of the team would be teeing off as well! The stat is showing how NOT important Gardner is!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I get your point, but the issue isn’t losing a few games, but that two of our pitchers(Suarez and Irwin) have apparently regressed to their mediocre mean, and are no longer dependable, leaving us with two useable starters and huge question marks in Kremer and Povich, AND still one short. The bullpen, despite lofty MLB Rankings, isn’t reliable, and we have nothing, nothing, in the minors. Will we pray that McDermott is the second coming of Nolan Ryan, who walked everyone in sight but was ok anyway? We have already lost 14-11 and 10-8. We have excellent offense, and can have better if Mike would end his love affair with Hays and Mullins, but Mike seems reluctant to make any major trades, and Burnes trade aside, that’s been his MO since we got over .500. The fear is that unless he does something significant, we will slowly sink. The question is whether Mike thinks we won’t sink enough to miss October.
    • I thought the 4-32 was 2008 so I went it looked it up, looks like that one was “only” 6-28 after being 62-65 on Aug 20. No shortage of late season collapses for this club. 
    • Other teams know exactly what we need. Mike does too. The idea he needs to wait another month to decide what he needs is pretty silly. And the idea that the price will be better a month from now instead of today is also pretty silly. The price will probably be higher, but it won’t be lower. waiting does nothing except minimize the impact of anyone we pickup.
    • The Orioles had clawed their way back to a .500 record preceding the 4-32 collapse in 2002. I went to the first game that kicked off the losing streak. Looking back at it now it was clearly fool's gold with that roster expecting them to be a good team. But after several down year's O's fans were hungry for a winning team. Little did we know the wait last another decade.
    • Understood, but I wasn’t referring to your comment, but to his. He failed to get anyone useful.
    • Yeah that was pretty epic, even for an already losing season. Or were they barely in contention? I conveniently can't remember. 2017? Nope, but that was pretty bad too. After a 7-game win streak to the end of August, they were 8 games back, but then lost 22 of 29 to finish 18 games out.
    • Westburg has the potential to have a Jeff Kent like career offensively with his ability shown so far to hit for good batting average and home run power.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...