Jump to content

Baumann DFA

ChipTait

By ChipTait
in Orioles Talk

 Share

Recommended Posts

SteveA Hangout Grand Counsel

SteveA

Posted
Posted
40 minutes ago, slakattack said:

I think that I read earlier that the waiver period is 10 days?  So, one way or another, we know MB's fate by NLT Tues. 5/28?

You have ten days to try to trade him, and then you have to put him on waivers and the waiver process begins.   Although I think that you can put him on waivers before the 10 days if you have no hope of trading him????   Seems to me I've seen guy's DFA waiver process resolved in less than 10 days before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Malike
Malike

Ehh, they don't seem like the kind of guys to make a knee-jerk reaction based on his appearance last night. I'm sure they've had enough data to suggest he should be the guy to go long before yesterday

Tony-OH
Tony-OH

The Orioles have plenty of 8th reliever candidates anyways.  Jonathan Heasley (0.60, 0.73 WHIP) and Dillon Tate (3.60, 0.80 WHIP) are on the 40-man while Kade Strowd (3.00, 0.67 WHIP) may have th

e16bball
e16bball

Don’t really understand the amount of disrespect Cionel Perez gets here. The guy posts a 1.54 ERA in 2021. He then scuffles a little (maybe a lot) to start last season, but closes the season with

Posted Images

Malike Hangout Grand Counsel

Malike

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, SteveA said:

You have ten days to try to trade him, and then you have to put him on waivers and the waiver process begins.   Although I think that you can put him on waivers before the 10 days if you have no hope of trading him????   Seems to me I've seen guy's DFA waiver process resolved in less than 10 days before.

It appears its 7 days not 10. From the MLB Site - 

When a player's contract is designated for assignment -- often abbreviated "DFA" -- that player is immediately removed from his club's 40-man roster. Within seven days of the transaction (had been 10 days under the 2012-16 Collective Bargaining Agreement), the player can either be traded or placed on outright or unconditional release waivers.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malike Hangout Grand Counsel

Malike

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

So if 2 teams want Baumann, he will be traded to the team who gives up more.  If only one team wants Baumann, they claim him and give up nothing?

They would still need to trade for him or wait for him to be placed on waivers and hope he reaches them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OriolesMagic83 Hangout Grand Counsel

OriolesMagic83

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Malike said:

They would still need to trade for him or wait for him to be placed on waivers and hope he reaches them.

Ok, I see.  It's 7 days to trade him.  If there's no interest he's placed on waivers. If claimed, the O's get nothing.  If not claimed, the O's can assign him to Norfolk or wherever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malike Hangout Grand Counsel

Malike

Posted
Posted
Just now, OriolesMagic83 said:

Ok, I see.  It's 7 days to trade him.  If there's no interest he's placed on waivers. If claimed, the O's get nothing.  If not claimed, the O's can assign him to Norfolk or wherever.

He can refuse the assignment and opt to be a free agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malike Hangout Grand Counsel

Malike

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

But isn't that only if he has been DFA'ed before?

Oh yeah, I thought he had more years, feels like he's been pitching for the O's for 10 years. If he had 5 years of service time he could refuse. I'd put the odds at about 0% that he isn't claimed, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OriolesMagic83 Hangout Grand Counsel

OriolesMagic83

Posted
Posted
Just now, Malike said:

Oh yeah, I thought he had more years, feels like he's been pitching for the O's for 10 years. If he had 5 years of service time he could refuse. I'd put the odds at about 0% that he isn't claimed, though.

Thanks for that knowledge.  It's definitely something I heard about 1000 times but never understood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Malike Hangout Grand Counsel

Malike

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Thanks for that knowledge.  It's definitely something I heard about 1000 times but never understood.

It's pretty damn confusing to be fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MCO'sFan Major Leaguer

MCO'sFan

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We’ll probably see Baumann traded for an A ball level player that is nowhere near being added to the 40 man. An Easton Lucas type from years ago. 

It will be interesting to see how others view him. I would think he will be claimed certainly but by how many teams? That will determine whether they get anything for him. Is there a team out there that wants him enough to give something/anything up for him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RZNJ Hangout Grand Counsel

RZNJ

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We’ll probably see Baumann traded for an A ball level player that is nowhere near being added to the 40 man. An Easton Lucas type from years ago. 

Anything more than “cash considerations” would surprise me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MCO'sFan Major Leaguer

MCO'sFan

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Anything more than “cash considerations” would surprise me.

I agree... I would love to have international slot money though. Do they still call them that with the new CBA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sportsfan8703 Hangout Grand Counsel

sportsfan8703

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, MCO'sFan said:

It will be interesting to see how others view him. I would think he will be claimed certainly but by how many teams? That will determine whether they get anything for him. Is there a team out there that wants him enough to give something/anything up for him?

I could see us making a trade with the Brewers for an A ball arm. We have ties with Milwaukee and a working relationship. We’ll get some arm that isn’t on the 40 man. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • waroriole
      FIX THE DANG BULLPEN

      By waroriole · Posted

      Is Rich Hill an option? I believe he was looking to sign with someone mid year. Would we consider him?
    • Frobby
      Norby and Vespi coming up?

      By Frobby · Posted

      They bring them up because we need to have guys on the bench available to pinch hit, pinch run, substitute for injured players, or give somebody a rest.   It's not a matter of not believing in them.  Some will get chances to start and some won't.   Just because a guy is starting every day in AAA doesn't mean he should get a chance to start every day (or even most to the time) in the majors.
    • Frobby
      Norby and Vespi coming up?

      By Frobby · Posted

      My source for the dates of the options is the Orioles.com transactions page.  I'm going to retract what I said about the 20 day rule, as I had misremembered it.  What it actually says is:  "If a Player is optionally assigned for a total of less than 20 days in one championship season, the Player shall be credited with Major League service during the period of such optional assignment(s); provided, however, that a Player shall not be credited with Major League service under this provision if the Player had zero days of Major League serv ice in the current season prior to the optional assignment and after the optional assignment was unconditionally released or assigned outright and not subsequently added to the Active List for the remainder of the championship season." So forget what I said about that.  Now, what I am not sure about is whether Vespi's recall to be the 27th man in St. Louis due to the suspended game counts towards his option total.   The answer to that isn't found in the CBA, but in a document called "Major League Rules" that used to be public, but apparently no longer is.   I am not talking about the document that describes the rules of play, but another document that contains, for example, the details of the "Rule 4 draft" and the "Rule 5 draft."
    • now
      How many RBI's has batting leadoff cost Gunnar?

      By now · Posted

      And is it fair to say 10-15 runs equates to about 1 to 1.5 wins? (Again, that's in a worst-order scenario.)
    • foxfield
      Extend Burnes

      By foxfield · Posted

      It’s a definite probable no for me. I don’t say that to split hairs.  So let me explain.    There is no way that the Orioles come out on an investment like the one it will take to extend Burnes. But would I, given his age and the likelihood of injury?  No.    Unless….I was prepared to spend twice that or more to land another pitcher on top of Burnes. The idea being if you’re in you’re in.    I cannot speak to the finances of the new ownership but the only way I would purchase someone like Burnes would be to buy 2 in hopes of having one. While still knowing the advantage if you have both and the risks of both are hurt.    Could the Orioles afford $600M? I don’t know.  Should any team?  No. But we live in a world where the Dodgers are spending Billions. 
    • gtman55
      Norby and Vespi coming up?

      By gtman55 · Posted

      I just wanna know why we bring up guys who play every day at AAA only to ride thd bench up here. Give these guys a chance like they the did with Holliday and if they suck send them down. At this point they're wasting the careers of guys like Stowers and Kjerstad. If you dot believe in them, trade them for pitching.
    • DrungoHazewood
      Extend Burnes

      By DrungoHazewood · Posted

      So what happens when the O's sign Burnes to a 8/300 deal, then Gunnar and Adley each want 10/250 to extend, then eventually you have to pay Westburg and Cowser, and everyone is going to want Holliday here through 2040, and you look up and the O's still have 30-40% of the revenues of the Yanks and Dodgers but the fans want them to have 80% of their payrolls? Oh, and then Burnes tears his UCL and misses 18 months and then has another half year where he's not the same, and then before you know it he's 35.

  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...