Jump to content

Bullpen Strategy for the 12:15 Restart


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Gunnar said:

OT but this

MLB teams must designate every player on the active roster either as a pitcher or a position player. Those designated as position players are unable to pitch unless it is extra innings or their team is ahead or trailing by more than six runs when they take the mound. Teams can also designate players as two-way players if they meet certain criteria. Two-way players are able to pitch in any situation but don't count toward the active roster's pitcher total.

is really stupid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I'd be down for Irvin for the rest of the game depending on if he's recovered.  

Whatever it is, someone's gotta go over an inning and Hyde can't do his typical "one pitcher for one inning" crap.

Irvin only threw 13 pitches on Sunday. He should be good for the remainder of the suspended game. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ShoelesJoe said:

Irvin only threw 13 pitches on Sunday. He should be good for the remainder of the suspended game. 

That's good, I didn't remember how many he threw.  

Either way, he's going to have to log some innings today, be it for the close out of this game or for a good chunk of the second game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

Sign me up for Irvin finishing last night's game.

If we get a lead why wouldn't we want a high leverage guy to close it out? I would think we would close it out with Cano but keep Kimbrel for the full game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

If we get a lead why wouldn't we want a high leverage guy to close it out? I would think we would close it out with Cano but keep Kimbrel for the full game.

That works. I was thinking potentially saving those arms for the 2nd game. You've made me rethink because I'm usually in favor of doing what's best for right now and worrying about the future when it gets here. Even saying that, I don't think I want to burn 4 BP arms in the first game because we might need them in the 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

If we get a lead why wouldn't we want a high leverage guy to close it out? I would think we would close it out with Cano but keep Kimbrel for the full game.

Get a lead? Right now, with the way this team is hitting, I'd be thrilled to get a hit . The struggle against this Cardinal team is annoying to me.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, dystopia said:

OT but this

MLB teams must designate every player on the active roster either as a pitcher or a position player. Those designated as position players are unable to pitch unless it is extra innings or their team is ahead or trailing by more than six runs when they take the mound. Teams can also designate players as two-way players if they meet certain criteria. Two-way players are able to pitch in any situation but don't count toward the active roster's pitcher total.

is really stupid. 

The O's just need to find another Ohtani.  Why didn't Elias think of that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, spleen1015 said:

That works. I was thinking potentially saving those arms for the 2nd game. You've made me rethink because I'm usually in favor of doing what's best for right now and worrying about the future when it gets here. Even saying that, I don't think I want to burn 4 BP arms in the first game because we might need them in the 2nd.

Just depends whether we get a lead or not. I prefer to think that we will :)

Here are the pitch totals the last three days:

Sat Perez 32, Coulombe 10, Suarez 15, Cano 5

Sun Webb 11, Irvin 13, Kimbrel 14

Mon Suarez 24, Perez 36, Akin 15

Tues None

We should definitely stay away from Perez and Suarez should be emergency only. 

Coulombe and Cano have to pitch, the only question is which game. I think if we get a lead we go for the win and pitch them. I could see using them in both games depending on pitch counts and situation. 

Kimbrel, Webb, and Akin should be available for 1 each and Irvin might be able to go more than that. Plus we should have the 27th man. I kind of think it should be a starter capable of multiple innings but we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gunnar said:

I had the same thought this morning.  According to this site we do get a 27th man today, but only for the second game:

https://fansided.com/posts/mlb-27th-man-rule-explained#:~:text=An MLB team can only,one day down the line.

In other cases, teams can call up a 27th man when they are completing a previously suspended game and have another game following the completion of the suspended game.

The 27th man is not eligible to play in the suspended game. They are only eligible to play in the originally scheduled game.

 

Melewski said this in his blog post last night, so he was apparently wrong:

"As this game was suspended, the teams do not get an extra player for play on Wednesday."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Irvin for 6/7 at least, 8th as well if he can unless we need cano/kimbrel. Save as much of the pen as we can for the second game.

 

tate, vespi and krook all didn’t pitch last night, so any of them could be options to come up for the second game. Vespi would be my guess. I think heasley started the other day so may not be available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OsFanInOhio said:

Irvin for 6/7 at least, 8th as well if he can unless we need cano/kimbrel. Save as much of the pen as we can for the second game.

 

tate, vespi and krook all didn’t pitch last night, so any of them could be options to come up for the second game. Vespi would be my guess. I think heasley started the other day so may not be available. 

Tate or Vespi would make the most sense since they've played for the O's before, but I wonder if logistically they can get someone from Worcester to St. Louis on such short notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
    • They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now.
    • Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. 
    • I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26.
    • Way to avoid the question.  If the O's were in rebuild mode and had Gray Rod in the exact position he is now, what kind of prospect package would you want?  Fans here are notorious for not wanting to give up any good prospects for other team's best players but then want the world for their own less than perfect players.  When Gausman was about to be traded here (way less an impressive pitcher than Gray Rod is now), posters here were convinced that the O's would get 3 top 100 prospects for him.  The O's got none 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...