Jump to content

Poll - Bigger Need… Game Three level SP or Elite Closer?


sportsfan8703

Poll - Bigger Need… Game Three level SP or Elite Closer?  

80 members have voted

  1. 1. Game 3 SP or Elite Closer?



Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

Not better, but of the same ilk. Schrezer, Crochet, Gausmann, one of Seattle's dawgs?

I don’t want to give you a hard time. Because I essentially agree with the need to improve our starting pitching.

But Scherzer not Gausman are of the same ilk/ability as Burnes at this point. It’s not particularly close IMO. Look at Burnes’ numbers this year and compare to what Gausman has done this year. Or what Scherzer did last year.

Yes one of SEA’s starters, Logan Webb, Tarik Skubal, even Crochet (if he is still able to start/allowed to throw that many innings in a season given the injury risk/history).

But Gausman or Scherzer, no thanks! 

I would prefer Gausman’s teammate Berrios over him at this point.

I don’t want Mad Max at all. Great career! But like Verlander, he is at the end and likely doesn’t have much if anything left in the tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like some others, I went with the SP because I don't think we need an explicit closer, just a bullpen arm or two that can be deployed in high leverage spots. If it had been framed that way, I probably would not have responded to the poll itself because I think the need is equal if we are to make a deep playoff run this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, vab said:

What elite closer is out there other than Miller who's price will be sky high. That's going to be a lot to gamble on a UCL that could go on any pitch. 

I get your point that there aren’t that many elite closets to begin with. And probably one Miller is available.

Maybe Helsley will available? While he is not  elite, he is better than any reliever that we currently have. Maybe Tyler or Taylor Rodgers from SF will be available? Maybe Lucas Erceg? Tanner Scott?

Again, none of these guys is elite but most are better than what we have now as guys who can be used in late inning/high leverage situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think our recent 5 game losing streak gave us a unique perspective that we haven't really had since Adley made his debut in 2022...  How valuable is a closer if they don't have a lead to protect?  Why trade for an elite closer when an elite closer affecting the game hinges on the Game 3 SP pitching well enough to even create a save situation?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Bemorewins said:

I get your point that there aren’t that many elite closets to begin with. And probably one Miller is available.

Maybe Helsley will available? While he is not  elite, he is better than any reliever that we currently have. Maybe Tyler or Taylor Rodgers from SF will be available? Maybe Lucas Erceg? Tanner Scott?

Again, none of these guys is elite but most are better than what we have now as guys who can be used in late inning/high leverage situations.

St. Louis is holding a wild card right now so highly unlikely they will drop to seller status by the deadline. Those other guys you mentioned are set-up which is the way Elias is probably going to have to go wrt the bullpen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked the closer option because it said "elite" versus a 'game three starter' which implies a decent option (not someone on Bradish's level). In the playoffs I want that guaranteed shortened game. Plus, our bullpen hasn't been all that impressive and I have hope for Povich and Kremer and Irvin to be good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vab said:

St. Louis is holding a wild card right now so highly unlikely they will drop to seller status by the deadline. Those other guys you mentioned are set-up which is the way Elias is probably going to have to go wrt the bullpen. 

It’s not like we don’t have plenty of good room for “setup” guys. Right now Baker is our best guy in the pen besides Kimbrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Orange said:

If you asked me if I'd rather have a healthy Bradish or a healthy Bautista, it's Bradish all day long.

I actually don't know. I find that kind of a tough question. Bautista was worth 5.4 rWAR. Bradish was 4.9. Not that those numbers are everything, especially when we're short good starters. 

But man, Felix was REALLY good. It's a shame we'll go two playoff years without seeing what he can do in the postseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I don’t think Baseball Savant is the best measure of first base defense. It only considers plays where first baseman is the first player to touch ball and doesn’t consider receiving throws at all.  For this reason, I think DRS is better for first base.
    • Elias isn’t doing anything close to that for 2 years of control 
    • It depends on the guy and the situation.   Mayo spent from June 30, 2022 to July 9, 2023 on the Baysox and from July 14, 2023 to now on the Tides.    Basically, a full year at each stop.  Westburg had 158 games at Norfolk.    Now I am going to say this for maybe the 25th time: I don't care how ready Basallo's bat becomes, he won't be promoted to the majors until (1) the O's decide he's ready defensively, or (2) they decide he isn't going to be a catcher.    They are NOT going to call him up to play half-assed catcher defense, not even if he's only catching 25% of the time.   They. Will. Not. Do. It.   And if that means he spends an extra half-season or even full-season in the minors after his bat is 100% ready to go, that's what they're going to do.   
    • well    Prospects with Enormous upside. Getz will probably ask for 2 of 3 …Holiday, Basallo and or Mayo, Plus more   https://www.lafbnetwork.com/los-angeles-dodgers-rumors-garrett-crochet-trade-offer/
    • I actually don’t think Elias is anywhere near that rigid in principle. However, he is very disciplined in wanting the value exchange to be even. He’ll maybe stretch a little but not much.  Practically, that limits the possibility for blockbuster trades. 
    • I did a project many years ago (which I posted about here) where I looked at the outcomes for every prospect from 1991-2005. In that period, there were only 8 hitters with >150 PA in the Eastern League at age 19 or younger (out of 1854 players in the EL age 26 or less overall). Exactly one (Dioner Navarro) had a OPS >.800. Others in that age-19 group included Edgar Renteria (0.717) and Jose Reyes (0.757). Only 12 hitters at age 20 in the EL had OPS >.800 in that span, and that list includes a massive number of future stars: Ryan Zimmerman, Jim Thome, Joe Mauer, Grady Sizemore, Cliff Floyd, Edgardo Alfonzo, Luis Castillo, Jhonny Peralta. Basallo's presence in the EL at his age is incredibly rare, and his performance at that age nearly unmatched. High performance at that age does not guarantee anything - nothing about prospects is guaranteed - but it makes major league success far more likely than for other young prospects, and in particular gives the highest chance of future stardom.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...