Jump to content

What makes Basallo so untouchable?


CP0861

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, CP0861 said:

"He has great offensive numbers"

Does he? He's at .281/.800 OPS right now with 11 home runs and a whopping 24xbh's. That's not great. How is that elite power? Elite potential maybe, but his actual numbers this year are not elite or great.

 

Great offensive numbers for a 19-year old in AA, is the key additive here. 

Edited by interloper
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

A #2 or #3 starter with a couple years of control for Basallo? You may well be trading someone like Carlos Delgado for two years of a pretty good starter. It would take more than that for me.

I love Basallo, but he's got a ways to go to get to Carlos Delgado.  I love that comp for him, but he still has to move up a couple levels and keep up the production.  Taking off the orange colored glasses and looking at it impartially, an established MLB #2 or #3 starter (who has already proven his worth at the ML level) is a very reasonable return for a top 20 prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

What is his innings cap?

Answer -  A totally arbitrary  number the team decides upon with Crochet and his agents approval. 

Lol, oh, I didn't say I agree with it, but the Orioles aren't that different from other teams and I certainly think that factors into his risk profile if he's a consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CP0861 said:

"He has great offensive numbers"

Does he? He's at .281/.800 OPS right now with 11 home runs and a whopping 24xbh's. That's not great. How is that elite power? Elite potential maybe, but his actual numbers this year are not elite or great.

 

There is a lot wrong with what you are saying but you need to consider that he missed most of ST and April was essentially his ST, so it has hurt his overall numbers but he has been on a tear since then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Otter said:

I love Basallo, but he's got a ways to go to get to Carlos Delgado.  I love that comp for him, but he still has to move up a couple levels and keep up the production.  Taking off the orange colored glasses and looking at it impartially, an established MLB #2 or #3 starter (who has already proven his worth at the ML level) is a very reasonable return for a top 20 prospect.

Can you name the last #2 and especially #3 starter who netted a top 20 prospect?

Would you feel Basallo for Dean Kremer?

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Lol, oh, I didn't say I agree with it, but the Orioles aren't that different from other teams and I certainly think that factors into his risk profile if he's a consideration.

It appears it's more of a Crochet thing.

The report also suggests any team that trades for him might have to negotiate an extension to get Crochet to agree to lift a workload limitation in the second half of the season.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Malike said:

Woo is hurt, Miller has a 6 ERA, they have 3 starters they can rely on, they aren't trading any of them. They are linked to Fedde among others.

Where are you getting your Miller stats? I’m seeing 3.88 ERA with 1.05 WHIP. Which would make him arguably our second best pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Why use player ages?  Because those are his peers. Those are guys that are physically and mentally more mature. To dominate them at a far younger age is something you rarely see. Again, we have seen the lists on here of his stats at age 19 and how they compare to all time and current great players. 
 

Age is huge in this.

And yes, those guys were there at young ages too…and they are all special elite level talents. That’s what Elias has built. 

He's in AA at a young age and doing well, but he's not dominating. He's just not.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

It appears it's more of a Crochet thing.

The report also suggests any team that trades for him might have to negotiate an extension to get Crochet to agree to lift a workload limitation in the second half of the season.

Fascinating. Don't really see that ultimatum working out for him or the White Sox if true. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Malike said:

It appears it's more of a Crochet thing.

The report also suggests any team that trades for him might have to negotiate an extension to get Crochet to agree to lift a workload limitation in the second half of the season.

How does that work?  Does he just refuse to pitch?  That would go over well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Can you name the last #2 and especially #3 prospect who netted a top 20 prospect?

Not off the top of my head.  You don't think an established #2 ML starting pitcher with 2+ years control is worth a top 20 prospect?  I'm not saying I'd definitely do that (it would depend on the pitcher), but I'd certainly consider it.  We have a huge dropoff in talent after our top prospects, so that really limits the quality of pitching we get back if we don't trade any top prospects.  By no means do I want to trade Basallo, it's just hard for me to see a scenario where we can get impact pitching without trading one of our top guys.  I don't think Norby, Beavers, DeLeon, etc. get us someone who moves the needle that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a whole thread about it of course. The fact we could split Adley and Basallo and potentially have a 800+ OPS catcher for all 162 games is an advantage no team has had since probably the 90s (if I were to guess).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CP0861 said:

He's in AA at a young age and doing well, but he's not dominating. He's just not.

 

 

He has dominated previously and like I said, his numbers are suppressed by a slow start due to an injury in ST where he had little ST time.

I mean, you come on here and ask why we value him so highly, we provide you with all the reasons, including some historical data and you just want to dismiss it.

Why the ask the question if you don’t want an answer?

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Can you name the last #2 and especially #3 starter who netted a top 20 prospect?

Would you feel Basallo for Dean Kremer?

You think Kremer is a #2/#3 starter??  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...