Jump to content

Vance Honeycutt


wildcard

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I think some of this is also an understanding that teams don’t value the same things they did 15+ years ago..had to be some adjusting made to the new way of things.

Hitting 220 isn’t considered a big problem anymore..even if it should be.

When the league average is .244, having a guy hit .220 who draws walks, has some power, runs well and plays good defense....you can probably live with that player in your lineup.  Sad, but true in today's baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, OsFanInOhio said:

I thought something similar. Except either comparing to a cf version of Jorge Mateo with 30hr power, or somewhere in the realm of Giancarlo Stanton if he could play defense and steal bases. He’s had a ops+ of 112, 86 and 121 the last 3 years despite striking out 30% of the time (quite a bit more than Santander). If Vance puts up 100-110 ops+ then plays elite cf defense and can steal 20+ bases, a k rate that high can still play. At least in theory. 

Of course Giancarlo Stanton was slashing .262/.356/.537/.893 with a 140 OPS+ at the MAJOR LEAUGE level at the same age as Honeycutt, so we probably have to cool the jets on that comparison. :D

Right now they have to let Honeycutt go play. They'll give him things to work on in the offseason and we'll see if he can come back next year with a good offseason and spring training under his belt and perform well in Aberdeen. If he can be playing in AA for half the season next year and hold his own he'll be on track.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/3/2024 at 10:15 AM, Warehouse said:

Below is my rough mental model (completely gut feel) for Honeycutt outcomes.  These estimates represents peak performance so variability in consistency and health would dilute aggregate WAR over control years to varying degrees.

Even when you consider effects from health/consistency, this paints a rosy picture of outcomes vs. the stats shared by Skanar.  So I might be overly optimistic here. On the other hand, college outfielders probably have better outcomes than other profiles, teams have likely improved evaluation since the early 90s, 22 is better than 21-30, and Elias may be a better evaluator than average.

 

Percentile                    

WAR/525 PAs                    

Comps

95th

5+

Brent Rooker bat, Kevin Kiermaier glove, Bobby Witt baserunning

90th

3.5-4.5

Luis Robert Jr or Byron Buxton without the injuries

75th

2.5-3.5

Jose Siri

60th

~2

Drew Stubbs

50th

1-2

Some version of Michael A. Taylor, Brett Phillips, or Keon Broxton with more power but also more Ks

40th

0-1

Sam Hilliard, Bradley Zimmer

30th

<0

Christian Pache, Daz Cameron, Arismendy Alcantera, Drew Robinson

≤ 20th

Never make majors         

Jeren Kendall

Drew Stubbs as a hitter is a great comp for Honeycutt, nice job. He'll probably be a much better CF defender though, not that Stubbs was terrible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Of course Giancarlo Stanton was slashing .262/.356/.537/.893 with a 140 OPS+ at the MAJOR LEAUGE level at the same age as Honeycutt, so we probably have to cool the jets on that comparison. :D

Right now they have to let Honeycutt go play. They'll give him things to work on in the offseason and we'll see if he can come back next year with a good offseason and spring training under his belt and perform well in Aberdeen. If he can be playing in AA for half the season next year and hold his own he'll be on track.

 

I’m in no way saying Vance will be Stanton. More showing an example of how over a 3 or 4 year stretch (the last few years specifically) a player can be an above average offensive player even striking out at a 30% clip. If he can even be an average mlb hitter (much like folks have said about Mateo for years) then Vance will be a good big leaguer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DocJJ said:

I'd vote no on this...

 

Gallo had some pretty good years.  Obviously he is/was a flawed player.  Still, he had seasons of 4.2, 3.1, 2.9 and 2.4 rWAR, was an all star twice, has won two Gold Gloves.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Your expectations are wildly off on what you think a draft pick should become.

How ironic.

Again, barring injury, I think if Bradfield only finishes the season in AA, that should be considered a disappointment.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, RZNJ said:

How ironic.

Again, barring injury, I think if Bradfield only finishes the season in AA, that should be considered a disappointment.”

We all need a little more slack on the minors board than the main board. 

Remember when a lot of us wanted Lawlar/Mayer over Cowser?  Or Austin Martin over Kjerstad?  Or Druw Jones over Holliday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

We all need a little more slack on the minors board than the main board. 

Remember when a lot of us wanted Lawlar/Mayer over Cowser?  Or Austin Martin over Kjerstad?  Or Druw Jones over Holliday?

Sure do.    0-4 with 3 strikeouts last night.   Honeycutt is headed for the worst debut of any Elias 1st round pick ever.   He could become an all-star and turn out to be a great pick.   But ………….

 

Let me add in a controversial possibility.   People talk about his floor being a 4th outfielder, platoon CF.    This guy might be Zach Watson II and top out at AA.  

Edited by RZNJ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Sure do.    0-4 with 3 strikeouts last night.   Honeycutt is headed for the worst debut of any Elias 1st round pick ever.   He could become an all-star and turn out to be a great pick.   But ………….

 

Let me add in a controversial possibility.   People talk about his floor being a 4th outfielder, platoon CF.    This guy might be Zach Watson II and top out at AA.  

We writing guys off in their draft year now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Lol, I just looked it up, Mayo is already at -0.7 rWAR.  in 37 at bats. Holliday is at -0.3 rWAR. Me, @Frobbyand @Sports Guy have provided more value to the Orioles this year.  
    • Just saw the SEA-NYY highlights from last night, and if you were opposing Luis Gil and he was wild to the tune of loading the bases on walks and a HBP and had run a 3-0 count 25 pitches deep in the 1st inning, is that the moment you would pick to try and steal home? That's what Victor Robles did.       A baseball game of "A lot to a little" quickly ensued.
    • Could it possibly be linked to what golf courses they might be looking to get to. ( say bucket list course like Pebble Beach, Cypress Point. Olympic Club, etc or just youre average Muni layout.
    • My bad.  I thought an earlier post was also by you but it was by @LookinUp
    • I didn't say it was all injuries.  But, fine.  Let's pretend it's just the injuries. Bradish Means G-Rod Wells DC Mateo Urias Mountcastle Westburg Bradish made 8 starts.  Let's be conservative and say that he would have made 30 starts, that's the same amount he made last year.  A starter that's healthy for a full season makes anywhere from 32-34 starts, but for argument's sake, let's be conservative like I said. Means made 4 starts.  Let's be conservative and say he would have only made 25.   G-Rod made 20 starts.  Let's be conservative and say he'd have only made 30. Wells made 3 starts, let's say be conservative again and say if healthy, he'd have matched the 20 games started last year.  But that doesn't really tell the whole story on him as he could have been effective out of the bullpen, too. That's 70 starts on the IL.  You can dice those numbers up anyway you want.  Feel free to knock off 10 or 20 starts off that number if you think I'm being too aggressive, that's still about 1/3 of a season of good starters on the shelf. DC got into 61 games last year, 29 this year.  Let's say he would have matched that this year.  That's 32 appearances out of the bullpen gone from one of our best relievers. Westburg has a 2.4 WAR so far this season, he was averaging just under 104 plate appearances per month.  Missed all of August, and will miss probably 2/3 of of September if we're lucky.  That's about 166 plate appearances right there. Mateo was at 208 plate appearances this year, 350 last year.  Replace that with Holliday who's an absolute zero.   I don't think I have to keep going, but I think you understand the point.  Add on top of this that Mayo has been a complete zero, Cowser is an automatic strikeout and had a .714 OPS last month and a .666 so far for this month.   You made the claim that other teams have dealt with injuries much better than the Orioles have, well, I'd be curious to find out if anyone has replaced 70 starts like we have and replaced a minimum of 308 at bats (Westburg and Mateo only, this isn't including Mounty and Urias) with absolute zeros at the plate from our farm system, and ~30 apperances from a key bullpen member. Oh, and I'm not including Bautista because we knew about him headed into the season. So, yeah.  Find me a team that's dealt with this many injuries this year and has done as well as Hyde has.    
    • Webb is already back, but yes I agree that Kimbrel should be DFA'd ASAP. Unlike Kimbrel, Burch Smith showed last night that he's capable of pitching well, even if he can't do that consistently. 
    • It’s not on Hyde which is why I never mentioned him in the post…
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...