Jump to content

"What Geeks Don't Get: Limits of Moneyball"


Recommended Posts

Thought this was interesting and not sure this is the right forum...

No baseball guys on the panel but it's related Moneyball a book that uses baseball to tell it's story so I stuck it here in case anyone is interested.

Pretty good panel MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference that includes Michael Lewis, Bill Simmons, Mark Cuban, Jonathan Kraft, Bill Polian, Daryl Morey

Video - "What Geeks Don't Get: Limits of Moneyball"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is well worth watching. There actually is not much discussion of baseball other than a little bit about the Red Sox and a sort of general statement (with which all panelists seemed to agree) that baseball is the easiest sport to analyze statistically because so much of it is based on individuals and you can more easily compartmentalize.

Fans of basketball and football absolutely should watch this though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I think Dan deserves some credit here.  Good thread, WC. DD was a good GM despite having a hand tied behind his back almost at all times (no international scouting and signing in South American countries, Peter Angelos, Showalter, the Chris Davis fiasco, etc).  As mentioned, he did find some really good unknown players in Miguel Gonzalez and the little heralded Chen who were good performers.  He did what he had to do in order to keep the major league team in contention throughout most of the 2010s and I believe he did his best at drafting with a franchise that, under the Angelos reign, hadn't given too much to attention to the farm system. His fingerprints are still on this team, I'm not upset about it.  I liked DD, he was the first competent GM we'd had in a long time. I think this sums it up best.  He wasn't infallible, but his years here were mostly good.  Good teams to watch, sell outs at Camden Yards, playoff appearances, etc.  I would add to @glenn__davis's list that he gave in to Buck Showalter a little bit too much.  The Davis contract is evidence of that but I also feel like there were a couple of other times (I can't remember off the top of my head) where Buck got what he wanted, perhaps at the expense of the team moving forward.  Buck, as much as I liked him, too, made no bones about the fact that he wasn't interested in a rebuild or developing young players, etc.  He wanted his guys, his vets and I think that's another area where DD had a hand tied behind his back. 
    • Adam Jones knew who was making the decision. https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-jones-main-0225-20160224-story.html
    • For Machado and Britton at their lowest value point
    • I’ve always felt that some of the statements that the Orioles had no talent whatsoever when Elias arrived were a bit overblown.  Interestingly, of the listed players in the OP, only Hays, Mullins and Santander had made their major league debut, and none of them were established major league players.    One glaring thing about that list is there’s not a single 2B/SS/3B or C.     
    • I agree.  The coddling and obsession about pitch counts seemingly do little to prevent TJ surgeries and other problems. 
    • Well Buck said he knew nothing lol    Put yourself in his shoes. Chris wore it on his sleeve. It ate at him, not being able to return statistically what the contract dictated. Let’s face it, the Orioles paid him for what he did in the past and hopefully was going to do in the future. Mr. Angelos felt a real commitment to the city to try to bring Chris back. At the time, everybody was clamoring for it and loved the idea. It was kind of a behind-the-scenes thing. I didn’t know a whole lot about it until it really happened   https://pressboxonline.com/2021/08/17/former-orioles-manager-buck-showalter-reflects-on-chris-davis-time-in-baltimore/
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...