Jump to content

The Orioles, the media and the Hangout


clarence

Recommended Posts

JackO is just jealous that the Hangout has surpassed pretty much every other form of legit media that covers the Orioles. I am guessing he used to or does work for one of those media.

I'm going to gander a guess that as great as the hangout is for those of us who love it, the traffic isn't close to that of the sports page -- or to be fair the O's section -- on the Sun or the Washington Post.

But no. I have not worked for any of those publications.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm going to gander a guess that as great as the hangout is for those of us who love it, the traffic isn't close to that of the sports page -- or to be fair the O's section -- on the Sun or the Washington Post.

But no. I have not worked for any of those publications.

And? So what?

Some of the best TV shows are on FX, which gets small ratings.

Yet 40 million people watch American Idol each week. Does that mean AI is better than, say, The Shield? Or Damages?

Your logic says Transformers 2 was one of the best movies of all time because it grossed $836+ million. Yet The Hurt Locker won the Oscar last year and made $40 million at the box office.

That is the kind of logic an esteemed "journalist" like yourself uses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And? So what?

Some of the best TV shows are on FX, which gets small ratings.

Yet 40 million people watch American Idol each week.

Your logic says Transformers 2 was one of the best movies of all time.

For the last time. I am not disparaging the O's hangout. I have already said that it is my third read after the Times and the Wash Post (which would make it my first O's read -- before the Sun and masn). I find it more entertaining.

Though let's be clear. One of the reasons that I read the site is that the posters here aggregate what stories on the Sun and masn and even espn are worth checking out.

Without the professional journalists at the big pubs, the hangout would lose and awful lot of content and value....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the last time. I am not disparaging the O's hangout. I have already said that it is my third read after the Times and the Wash Post (which would make it my first O's read -- before the Sun and masn). I find it more entertaining.

Though let's be clear. One of the reasons that I read the site is that the posters here aggregate what stories on the Sun and masn and even espn are worth checking out.

Without the professional journalists at the big pubs, the hangout would lose and awful lot of content and value....

No, it wouldn't. The OH, and other blogs, websites and forms of media, would just replace them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it wouldn't. The OH, and other blogs, websites and forms of media, would just replace them.

and then one day the blogs and the other forms of media will realize that they too have to start paying journalists in order to bring on board talent that will get accurate scoops and have credible access to information others do not, and we will be right back where we started...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, you are just being insulting and are clearly not reading what I am writing. So, in jest I will shoot back with this answer to your 85 percent quip:

Hey, 99 percent of us could join the armed forces and do it well. Most of us are too smart to consider it.

You are one sorry piece of ****. I don't know how some people let you get away with saying this, but I'd ban your sorry ass from this board, forever. It is the armed forces that has given you "journalists" the freedom to do whatever it is you do. (edit)

For your information, I've lost a family member and a close friend fighting for this country and for anyone not to have respect for anyone that wears the uniform can go to hell in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are one sorry piece of ****. I don't know how some people let you get away with saying this, but I'd ban your sorry ass from this board, forever. It is the armed forces that has given you "journalists" the freedom to do whatever it is you do. Only some liberal piece of trash could even say something like this and think it was funny.

For your information, I've lost a family member and a close friend fighting for this country and for anyone not to have respect for anyone that wears the uniform can go to hell in my book.

No. No. He said that in Jest, see? That makes it all OK.

The dickweed. heh heh. just kidding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are one sorry piece of ****. I don't know how some people let you get away with saying this, but I'd ban your sorry ass from this board, forever. It is the armed forces that has given you "journalists" the freedom to do whatever it is you do. Only some liberal piece of trash could even say something like this and think it was funny.

For your information, I've lost a family member and a close friend fighting for this country and for anyone not to have respect for anyone that wears the uniform can go to hell in my book.

I'm sorry for your loss. Really. Don't think that all of us liberals are in step with this kind of bull#@*% "joking".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are one sorry piece of ****. I don't know how some people let you get away with saying this, but I'd ban your sorry ass from this board, forever. It is the armed forces that has given you "journalists" the freedom to do whatever it is you do. Only some liberal piece of trash could even say something like this and think it was funny.

For your information, I've lost a family member and a close friend fighting for this country and for anyone not to have respect for anyone that wears the uniform can go to hell in my book.

JackO's remark was in very bad taste. But as someone on the left side of center, I take offense at the "liberal piece of trash" remark. This is not a political website and there are board rules about that. The vast, vast majority of liberals are 100% resptectful and supportive of our troops and fully understand the sacrifices that they make. That's all I will say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JackO's remark was in very bad taste. But as someone on the left side of center, I take offense at the "liberal piece of trash" remark. This is not a political website and there are board rules about that. The vast, vast majority of liberals are 100% resptectful and supportive of our troops and fully understand the sacrifices that they make. That's all I will say.

Agreed. No reason to throw liberal or conservative into this at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • No one would use the word "underachieve" to describe someone who didn't meet expectations due to injuries or circumstances beyond their control. Like that's just not what that word means in normal usage.  But technically, sure, Tiger Woods achieved less than was expected of him. Lol. 
    • This is a different team. Corbin Burnes would have made a difference IMO and we have now acquired him.  I am not dogmatic in believing that it has to be Miller and nothing/nobody else. I am saying that there is a serious argument to be made that Miller or another elite backend bullpen weapon is the piece to take us over the top when the Fall get's here. With a team this good who has legit WS aspirations with a strong argument to be made that we have the best team in the AL, I would hate for us to pin our WS hopes on a pitcher like Craig Kimbrel at this point in his career. IMO he is not good/reliable enough. If we have to get into a game (in October) where it turns into a battle of the bullpens, I would prefer not to have bring a knife to a gun fight.  
    • I appreciate this deep cut non-#10 Tejada. 
    • LOL.  Technically, he underachieved because of injury but I think most people equate underachiever with a lack of effort.  
    • I'm not sure if there are any hunters here, but it can be a pretty demanding full-body workout. I suspect Markakis wasn't sitting in a tree stand. I walk miles in rough terrain, good times.
    • I understand your argument, but I think your word choice of "underachieved" isn't helping. When it comes to a guy like Tiger, it's hard to call that guy an underachiever, especially when his work ethic is known and undeniable.  The guy can barely walk and he's still out there trying...that's not an underachiever. Underachieving, IMO (and I think what a lot of people think of when they hear the word) is when someone doesn't live up to to their potential, or work hard to maximize their potential...outside of being injured.   Plenty of things can de-rail a career, I don't think that means that individual is an underachiever.  I don't think Griffey is an underachiever, I don't think Trout is, either.  I just think they haven't had the careers they might have had if they were able to stay healthy. When debating these things, it's helpful to have a definition of which to work with.  So while I agree with you that guys like Tiger, Trout, Griffey and others haven't had the careers they were supposed to have, that doesn't mean they were underachievers.  They just got de-railed...now some of that was their own doing, some of that is just the tolls of playing their sports.  
    • Well deserved. I would have liked to have seen him finish his whole career Baltimore, but mostly have seen him be able to play in the 2012 playoffs. I also appreciate that because of him I know what a kinkajou is.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...