Jump to content

A-Rod facing another suspension?


sangar

Recommended Posts

Law enforcement.

Having been extensively involved in the poker industry for the majority of my adult life I can tell you, without question, that this statement shows a fundamental lack of understanding. Also, what could possibly make you think no one gets hurt? The story itself originated with a violent episode. A lot of people go into these games and after becoming intoxicated with free girls, drugs, and booze, lose a lot more money than they can afford. If they don't pay, with interest, they will not be sued by a collection agency, they will be visited by collectors.

The authorities couldn't care less if you have a home game. They have very good reason to crack down on these games as severely as they do.

AROD didn't hurt anyone.

If you are stupid to go into one of these games and don't have the money to sit down and play, that's on you.

I mean, I guess stupidity is a legit issue but whatever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Good post. I don't think this is a huge deal, but what you point out is what makes it a legit issue.

Exactly. It's like people in this thread have never seen The Sopranos, The Wire or any number of mob movies. In the end this was probably innocent but who exactly do people think usually run things like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AROD didn't hurt anyone.

If you are stupid to go into one of these games and don't have the money to sit down and play, that's on you.

I mean, I guess stupidity is a legit issue but whatever.

You're absolutely right about stupidity but this problem is exacerbated by the "freebies". The whole idea behind them is designed to get people to overspend.

Say Joe Shmoe goes in there, has a couple drinks, has a girl, does some extasy and a little coke. They pretty much know what this guy is about. Pretty soon he has lost $10,000 that he simply does not have. Well, the guys running the game actually do not want to be paid back. They don't want the $10,000 nor do they want to hurt the guy. What they want is the $500 per week interest and they will bleed the guy relentlessly to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're absolutely right about stupidity but this problem is exacerbated by the "freebies". The whole idea behind them is designed to get people to overspend.

Say Joe Shmoe goes in there, has a couple drinks, has a girl, does some extasy and a little coke. They pretty much know what this guy is about. Pretty soon he has lost $10,000 that he simply does not have. Well, the guys running the game actually do not want to be paid back. They don't want the $10,000 nor do they want to hurt the guy. What they want is the $500 per week interest and they will bleed the guy relentlessly to get it.

Yea, I get all of that.

But my point is, who cares if AROD sat a table and played some poker? Even if it was a shady game, if there is no proof he is doing drugs and things like that, then I just don't see it as a big deal and certainly not a national newsworthy story.

If he is doing drugs, getting into fights, etc...then I can see it being an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I get all of that.

But my point is, who cares if AROD sat a table and played some poker? Even if it was a shady game, if there is no proof he is doing drugs and things like that, then I just don't see it as a big deal and certainly not a national newsworthy story.

If he is doing drugs, getting into fights, etc...then I can see it being an issue.

This is the point. If it's a shady game, being run by shady people (like gangsters/drug dealers/etc), then why does that seem to be okay with you? Even if Arod's not doing anything necessarily wrong, you have no problem with him possibly associating himself with criminals?

And I'm pretty sure this has been said repeatedly in this thread, it's not about the activity that was taking place. It's about the legality of it and the company that was being kept, while the activity was taking place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, I get all of that.

But my point is, who cares if AROD sat a table and played some poker? Even if it was a shady game, if there is no proof he is doing drugs and things like that, then I just don't see it as a big deal and certainly not a national newsworthy story.

If he is doing drugs, getting into fights, etc...then I can see it being an issue.

I agree with what you are saying about the tabloid nature of the news media. Look at what they did to Tiger Woods. Sharks smelling blood.

I just think MLB should have taken some sort of measure to keep it's players from lending credibility to this sort of illegal game. They basically gave him (and all players?) approval to continue. If sports players are not sanctioned for associating with illegal games it's only a matter of time until something bad happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the comment that anything that throws a monkey wrench into the Yankees machine I am all for.

If Rodriguez was banned from MLB, it could work out for the Yankees.

He is on the decline, and that would be a lot of money freed up.

I'd rather see him play poorly at 40 in a Yankees uni.

I'm all for a suspension though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the point. If it's a shady game, being run by shady people (like gangsters/drug dealers/etc), then why does that seem to be okay with you? Even if Arod's not doing anything necessarily wrong, you have no problem with him possibly associating himself with criminals?

And I'm pretty sure this has been said repeatedly in this thread, it's not about the activity that was taking place. It's about the legality of it and the company that was being kept, while the activity was taking place.

No..Its none of my business what he does.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1. Mayo’s defense at 3B has improved.  Not saying it’s even average but maybe. 2. Mullins slumps are scary and even if he rebounds he’s not here long term. 3. Mateo (I know! I know!) is impersonating a ML hitter, with GG caliber defense and game changing speed.  
    • I think there are some similarities. In this day and age, cops can pretty much lateral to any dept in the country due to shortages everywhere. The guys you work with can be stand-up dudes, it's command staff that usually makes the job suck for its officers, and much like a clubhouse you can have a bad squad. Burnes won't have 30 options during the offseason, I suspect. He probably has 5 or 6 teams who would possibly pay what he's asking for. 
    • You mentioned people have nothing to base it on besides a different last name.  That's not really correct.   If you look at recent history among all sports - when there is an ownership change, the new owners more often then not make significant investments in the team. 
    • The O’s travel to St. Louis to face off in three games against the Cardinals, who are 20-26 but have won 5 of their last 7, winning series against the Angels and Red Sox in the process.  The Cards are 8-12 at home this year, while the Orioles are 12-5 on the road.  The pitching matchups are: Dean Kremer (3-3, 3.72 ERA) vs. Sonny Gray (5-2, 3.05 ERA) Kyle Bradish (0-0, 2.63) vs. Lance Lynn (1-2, 4.17) John Means (2-0, 3.06) vs. Kyle Gibson (3-2, 4.09) As always seems to be the case lately, we’re getting the best-performing part of the Cardinals’ rotation, but bring it on!  In his career, Gray is 6-6 against the Orioles with a 4.58 ERA.  Last year we faced him twice in a week with diametrically opposite results: he shut out the O’s for 6 innings on July 2 but allowed 6 runs in 6 innings on July 8.  Lynn is 3-2 with a 3.57 ERA against the O’s in his career; we didn’t face him last year.  Gibson has a career mark of 6-2 with a 3.82 ERA against the Orioles; he was with us, not against us, in 2023. Kremer has only seen the Cardinals once, in 2023, allowing 5 ER in 4.1 IP.  Bradish made his lone start against the Cardinals in 2022, allowing 2 ER in 7 IP.  Means allowed 3 ER in 5 IP last year in his only career appearance vs. the Cards.   So, the Orioles have played a lot more games against the St. Louis pitchers then the Cards have played against ours.  We’ll see how that plays out. If it comes down to the bullpens, the O’s appear to have the advantage.  The O’s pen has a 3.39 ERA (7th in MLB) and an 11-6 record.  The Cardinals relief corps have a 4.17 ERA (18th) and a 7-10 record.  They’ve done a good job of preserving leads, though, saving 14 and blowing only 5 saves (74%); the O’s have saved 14 while blowing 10 (58%).   The back end of the St. Louis pen has been very good: closer Ryan Helsley has a 1.35 ERA and 13 saves, while set up men  Jo Jo Romero and Andrew Kittredge have a 1.54 and 2.41 ERA, respectively. Offensively, it’s been a tough year for the Redbirds.   Their 3.80 runs/game is 25th in MLB and their 92 OPS+ is 23rd.  The O’s, who showed signs of emerging from a team slump over the weekend, rank 4th in MLB at 5.02 runs per game, and 2nd in OPS+ at 118.  They’ve outhomered the Cards 68-38.   There are no active Cardinal regulars with an .800+ OPS (Willson Contreras, at .950, is on the IL), but they do have five players over 100 OPS+.  They haven’t gotten much from mainstays Nolan Arenado (105 OPS+) and Paul Goldschmidt (75).    Seems like we should be able to keep the Cardinals offense to a few runs each night, and we’ll see if our offense is back in gear.     
    • I was making the assumption that was the plan like I think most folks on the OH were. You could be right and that was my entire point. If they do this, we won't see him for a while.
    • Right.  Well, playing 1-2 games a week in CF just makes him more versatile but yeah, it would be odd if the plan was to call him up soon to play 2B.   Which makes me think the plan isn’t set in stone one way or the other.   They just want as many options as possible.
    • Do you agree that if they do that, Holliday won't be up anytime soon? Seems almost a little desperate to me. What has changed to do this now, in the middle of the season and after he struggled so much in his brief MLB time? Has Mayo's defense improved that much? Have they soured on Mullins that quickly? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...