Jump to content

A-Rod facing another suspension?


sangar

Recommended Posts

I dislike A-Rod as much as the next guy but I think this controversy is completely bogus. He's schmoozing with other obscenely rich celebrities. It's not like he's gambling for his life in the Mos Eisley Cantina.

That's the debate right there. Where do you draw the line? Has to be no gambling, period. Can't be no gambling except for sometimes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
The arrogance is what gets to me. After being sternly warned about this, he ignores some of the biggest legal poker houses in the world to play in an illegal game. These casinos have great action and celebrities are not uncommon so he wouldn't have necessarily stood out or drew undue attention. I just don't get it unless he thinks he is above the rules.
MLB has no subpoena power. They have an eyewitness who says Alex was not there. Problem solved.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB has no subpoena power. They have an eyewitness who says Alex was not there. Problem solved.

Baseball can do what it likes. Court, trial or witness dont mean too much. Ask the Chicago Eight. Didnt they beat the case in court just to see Baseball comedown like a ton of bricks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the dumbest, most blown out of proportion NON story ever.

He is playing poker..Big f'ing deal.

There isn't a rich athlete who doesn't gamble some way or another.

I would venture to guess that a huge majority of this site has played in poker games before...as have most of the reporters covering this "story".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the dumbest, most blown out of proportion NON story ever.

He is playing poker..Big f'ing deal.

There isn't a rich athlete who doesn't gamble some way or another.

I would venture to guess that a huge majority of this site has played in poker games before...as have most of the reporters covering this "story".

Your missing the difference. Daddy(Selig) told him not to do it. He did it anyway. It is a threat to Selig and his long term authority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your missing the difference. Daddy(Selig) told him not to do it. He did it anyway. It is a threat to Selig and his long term authority.

Selig being the same as Kennesaw Mountain Landis. And Albert Spalding. And Rube Foster.

Or not....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your missing the difference. Daddy(Selig) told him not to do it. He did it anyway. It is a threat to Selig and his long term authority.

Or...maybe they are worried that one of the greatest players of the past half century will get into trouble. Pete Rose got a lifetime ban for gambling on the game. They don't want players getting caught up with people who are gambling bookies or gamblers themselves. In addition to the danger, yes they've already warned him. Whole can of worms too. They kept Rose out of the HOF, what if there were gambling questions around a player this big and he gets in anyway.

And on SG's point, yeah its pretty silly. Virtually everyone plays a home game at some point, and if you are rich and famous your home game will include people who are also rich and famous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or...maybe they are worried that one of the greatest players of the past half century will get into trouble. Pete Rose got a lifetime ban for gambling on the game. They don't want players getting caught up with people who are gambling bookies or gamblers themselves. In addition to the danger, yes they've already warned him. Whole can of worms too. They kept Rose out of the HOF, what if there were gambling questions around a player this big ... and he gets in anyway ?

And on SG's point, yeah its pretty silly. Virtually everyone plays a home game at some point, and if you are rich and famous your home game will include people who are also rich and famous.

Possible questions of gambling AND already a known steroid user. Speaking of which, he has continued playing with fire in that arena as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible questions of gambling AND already a known steroid user. Speaking of which, he has continued playing with fire in that arena as well.

Note that I wasn't saying that this or steroid allegations should keep ARod from the Hall of Fame. He deserves to be in there, first ballot, with a very high vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would bet money that ARod isnt a first time ballot Hall of Famer. I think the media will make him sweat a little.

You might be right, however I think enough folks from the steroid era will be in by then that he will be first ballot. We are probably talking 10 years from now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would bet money that ARod isnt a first time ballot Hall of Famer. I think the media will make him sweat a little.

It would be a CRIME for him to not be a first ballot HOFer. Right now he has 626 HRs and 2762 hits. His OPS is .955. His career WAR is over 105. He should pass Mike Schmidt before he retires, but that puts him top 20 all time.

There is no reason, at all, to make him wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be a CRIME for him to not be a first ballot HOFer. Right now he has 626 HRs and 2762 hits. His OPS is .955. His career WAR is over 105. He should pass Mike Schmidt before he retires, but that puts him top 20 all time.

There is no reason, at all, to make him wait.

Clemens going to be a first time ballot? I tell you there will be more to this than just stats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Yeah, I admit I got baited by the thread title a bit and popped off before actually listening to the thing.  It doesn't really change that I've always been concerned about Cal being part of the ownership group, but I was definitely hasty to be like "SEE??". Anyway, I've got my eye on Cal. The guy just rubs me the wrong way. But hopefully nothing much to see here, or in the future. 
    • Meanwhile, I have a question about Mayo’s defense.  Everybody implies that it’s dreadful. I guess I can understand that he’s not Manny or Brooks, but how bad is it? Are we hoping he’s at least as good as George Brett, about whom someone once said,(paraphrasing), “his defense is so bad it’s like he carries his bat to the base instead of his glove.“? I love defense, and I see absolutely no reason to move Westburg away. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. It seems far more advisable to plunk Mayo at first and do something with the guys we currently have there?  
    • I think the thread title was misleading.  Not necessarily intentionally.  But if you just  see that without reading everything that was said and considering the context, it would be concerning.  
    • You know, for $24 a year, a measly lousy 24 bucks a year, you can edit your comment. And you can also support @Tony-OHwho has done more work online to create an Orioles environment than literally anybody else in the entire Internet universe.
    • I think there see plenty of guys who will stay with a contending team they like if the money is close.   But Burnes clearly intends to test the market.   No significant home team discount is coming, and it just takes one team to offer something crazy to knock us out of the picture unless we’re just being stupid. 
    • When Mateo is hitting well, he really makes you wonder why he can’t do it all the time.   He looks really balanced at the plate, he uses all fields, etc.  He doesn’t look like a bad hitter who happens to be on a heater.   But that’s what his track record shows he is, until proven otherwise.  I remember that Fangraphs article last year about how Mateo had changed his approach and the improvement seemed real.  Well, no it wasn’t.  But maybe his issues are more psychological than physical?   He’s just a guy who when he slumps, quickly loses confidence and starts pressing and makes it worse?   I don’t know.    As to your point about OBP: in 2024, a .299 OBP is below average but I might not say it blows.  The MLB average is back down to .312 after a spike last year after the rule changes.  Of 312 players with 80+ PA, Mateo’s .299 ranks 191st, or 39th percentile.   Honestly, in this environment, if Mateo could stay at .299 OBP he’d be a very credible player.   But he’s a .272 career OPS guy who’d been at .267 the last two years, so I’m not expecting he’ll be able to stay at .299.   I’ll enjoy it while he’s hot though.   And he is playing a mean 2B.   Took him a couple of weeks to settle in there, but he’s looked great for the last month.    
    • I broached the experiment of Holliday in CF some months ago.  It seems to be something that could make sense.  I still expect he'll be our 2B moving forward, but having such versatility is never a bad thing.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...