Jump to content

O's Sign Endy Chavez


Greg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 159
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I was wondering when the Orioles would get their first ex-Nat. Seems the the Nats have had a few ex-O's over the years but not the reverse. Too bad its not someone who is any good.

To be fair, Chavez is likely to be a very good 4th outfielder, late inning defensive replacement, pinch runner. IOW, he should be very good for the role he was acquired to fill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about Reimold?

I'd personally avoid complicating Reimold's chance to start and prove his value as a MLBP...

How is a guy with a .313 lifetime .OBP who is caught stealing in more than 1/3rd of his attempts the "best leadoff option" outside of Roberts? :roll eyes:

Name a better option on the Orioles roster....Never said Chavez was a great leadoff hitter, he's a good backup option on any team (as his PA's suggest).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah that makes sense that balls in play would correlate to how hard balls are hit haha. But to say that our pitching would have still been last in the league with a much better defense is not reality. I would bet money that the huge difference between our ERA and FIP or xFIP is because of our historically bad defense. Now the exact performance of our staff with a league average defense can be debated but the current trend of the smartest teams in baseball should tell you something about the signficant impact defense has on a pitching staff.

The Orioles were last in FIP (4.67) and second to last in xFIP (4.29) in ALL OF BASEBALL last year. Yes the team ERA (4.92) was significantly higher than their xFIP, but no matter how you want to look at the statistics, the Orioles had one the worst pitching staffs in the league last year, Period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles were last in FIP (4.67) and second to last in xFIP (4.29) in ALL OF BASEBALL last year. Yes the team ERA (4.92) was significantly higher than their xFIP, but no matter how you want to look at the statistics, the Orioles had one the worst pitching staffs in the league last year, Period.

Anyone who thinks we can hit our way out of this mess needs to read this post. Then read it again. Then read it aloud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles were last in FIP (4.67) and second to last in xFIP (4.29) in ALL OF BASEBALL last year. Yes the team ERA (4.92) was significantly higher than their xFIP, but no matter how you want to look at the statistics, the Orioles had one the worst pitching staffs in the league last year, Period.

QFT

#AngelosisTheEmporer

Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles were last in FIP (4.67) and second to last in xFIP (4.29) in ALL OF BASEBALL last year. Yes the team ERA (4.92) was significantly higher than their xFIP, but no matter how you want to look at the statistics, the Orioles had one the worst pitching staffs in the league last year, Period.

I agree our pitching staff was bad either way you look at it but its also very clear how our team D was just as bad if not worse. I really see to good guys on defense and the rest rang from slightly below average to historically bad. I think people would be amazed at how much team D will help or pitching and our record.

Just ask the Rays!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, Endy Chavez had a 322.5 SQD while Reimold had a 374 SQD. There's really no comparison, Reimold should get the majority of the at bats in LF.

Dude, you can't possibly be serious. Endy Chavez had a 1.0 RngR last year whereas Reimold's was a lowly 0.4. To suggest that Reimold should start over Chavez would be utter foolishness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree our pitching staff was bad either way you look at it but its also very clear how our team D was just as bad if not worse. I really see to good guys on defense and the rest rang from slightly below average to historically bad. I think people would be amazed at how much team D will help or pitching and our record.

Just ask the Rays!!!!!!!

Well, many of the people think that a few of the players that make our defense bad are actually pretty good or not really so bad. In addition, a somewhat arbitrary study about babip seems to have given them ammo that our defense is actually pretty good but our pitchers just get hit very hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • You put Ventura in the 1884 Union Association and he wins 57 games just that year. Well, except being a mentally unstable member of a minority group in a less enlightened era, with what was probably a limited grasp of English, I'm thinking he gets shot in a bar the evening after opening day...
    • What does everyone think about Tyler Soderstrom or Kyle McCann? I think I might be willing to trade Basallo if we can get someone like Miller plus some decent depth at catcher. We could also maybe add a couple of our younger lower level prospects to the trade. The A’s are probably looking for as much youth as possible and don’t have as much use for these guys who can contribute now.   I think depth at catcher will be big for the O’s, with as much as they want to DH Adley. Would love to have a lefty hitting catcher with some power to give Adley more regular days off. The biggest hangup I’d have to trading Basallo is that he could end up being that guy. If he doesn’t look like he can stick at catcher, I’d be more willing to trade him because we already have plenty of 1B/DH type guys. 
    • On the other hand, @Sports Guy's take isn't uncommon because Nick had a 7.4 win season at the age of 24. Following a really good season at 23, and a solid rookie season at 22 after he skipped AA. If you look hard enough in the archives here you can find a post I made in 2009 or 2010 saying Nick had about a 1-in-3 chance of being a Hall of Famer. 14 wins through three seasons and age 24 is a heck of a foundation to build on. Lots of Hall of Famers were behind that pace. But unfortunately he never had another 3-win season, much less a seven. Age 27 peak is just an average, it's not destiny. But it's pretty rare to have Nick's first three years and then not have much more career value from age 25-36, total. Injuries or whatever reason, he was worth 14 wins from 22-24, and 20 from 25-36. And as much as I wanted him to stay, his years in Atlanta were just treading water, piling up base hits, but a cumulative value above replacement in six years about equal to his 2008 season. Nick was almost certainly not a difference-maker the large majority of his last 8-9 years in the league.
    • Which one of those is he not on par with in terms of talent? Maybe Chapman? Maybe.
    • Cowser getting the night off tonight makes sense.
    • He's going to be on next year's ballot for the actual Cooperstown HOF. So if they don't care when you're "officially" retired why should the Orioles? 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...