Jump to content

Josh Hamilton market update - 3 years $60-75 million


TradeAngelos

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 578
  • Created
  • Last Reply

O's and Hamilton's agents phone conversation:

Agent: Hello this is Mike Moye

O's: Hi Mr. Moye, this is Dan Duquette from the Baltimore Orioles. We we would like to submit a proposal for Josh Hamilton.

Agent: Wonderful. Josh is looking for a 4 year deal.

O's: Well, we're willing to go 3 years at 25 million.

Agent: Ok...that is an offer I can take to Josh. How would you spread the money out over the 3 years? Would you want to front-load the deal or anything?

O's: no no no....we would pay him $8.3 million each year.

Agent: Wait....um....what's that?....oh I have another call. Gotta go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we could get Hamilton on a 3/75 or 4/90 type deal, I'd have to think that PA may be up for that.

Hamilton would make this lineup infinitely better.

No possible way Angelos would sign off on those kind of numbers for Hamilton, or for anyone else for that matter. They had no intentions of bringing Reynolds back and it wasn't to upgrade at first base. DD is talking like Conor Jackson is his big first base acquisition. I don't know who the source is for the articles we see stating that the Orioles are ready to be a player in the FA market every winter, but as long as PA is incharge, they will not be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b

Wow - that's a really balanced, rationale examination of the potential Josh Hamilton would bring to this lineup.

He's a great hitter, no doubt.

A great hitter heading into what are generally the declining years of a player's career. A great hitter that has only averaged 123 games a year during his physical prime due to frequent stints on the DL.

For teams without infinity dollar budgets(i.e.- The Baltimore Orioles), the risk attached to any high dollar multi-year deal has to be measured against the possible reward. And in this case, where we're discussing a contract for a 32 year old injury magnet with a history of drug addiction that would comprise 20% or more of the payroll for the next few seasons, the former far outweighs the latter.

I'd rather pass, and any other rational fan that wants to win consistently, and not just NEXT YEAR, should want the Front Office to the same. And Thank God that they will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

b

He's a great hitter, no doubt.

A great hitter heading into what are generally the declining years of a player's career. A great hitter that has only averaged 123 games a year during his physical prime due to frequent stints on the DL.

For teams without infinity dollar budgets(i.e.- The Baltimore Orioles), the risk attached to any high dollar multi-year deal has to be measured against the possible reward. And in this case, where we're discussing a contract for a 32 year old injury magnet with a history of drug addiction that would comprise 20% or more of the payroll for the next few seasons, the former far outweighs the latter.

I'd rather pass, and any other rational fan should want the Front Office to the same.

You were right the first time and this clarification will do nothing for those who simply want to throw money around, logic will not pursued them. Some here have the motto that any high priced premium name player would be a great addition, and the financial situation of team (the real one the O's are operating under, not the one where we pretend Pete's gonna give out blank checks) is of no concern. It doesn't matter to them whether it would leave the team hamstrung in the future, it's a matter of principle, they want to spend Pete's money because they hate him, if it goes bad who cares because it's Pete's money and they hate Pete. Thing is, it's not Pete that's hurt, it's the O's, cause he isn't gonna keep writing checks. Don't bother trying to make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree the O's had better get in on this. The pieces are in place for success. Some of the comments I have read on this site have been disgusting regarding this man. I had no idea there were so many flawless O's fans, Please for the Love of God give Josh Hamilton a chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah! Let's spend 20%-30% of our budget for the next 3 or 4 years on an injury-prone 32 year old recovering drug addict that has only played in more than 140 games twice in his entire career! It makes perfect sense!

:rolleyes:

Injury prone! Like when he was playing hard and broke his arm at home plate? That is injury prone? It isnt his back with cronic disc problems, it is him giving it his all. Dont look at his stats and see he has played x amount of games and just say he is injury prone. That is officially the dumbest statement of the day. PS I have been drinking, so I am probably over reacting. But get serious! I would be in at 5/115 ALL Day, and so should the Os

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Injury prone! Like when he was playing hard and broke his arm at home plate? That is injury prone? It isnt his back with cronic disc problems, it is him giving it his all. Dont look at his stats and see he has played x amount of games and just say he is injury prone. That is officially the dumbest statement of the day. PS I have been drinking, so I am probably over reacting. But get serious! I would be in at 5/115 ALL Day, and so should the Os

Dude, the stats don't lie. In 6 MLB seasons, all of which were during his physical prime, he played in 140 or more games TWICE. He's missed 40 or more games three times. And now he's heading into the years when a player's body typically begins to break down.

I would pass and wouldn't lose a wink of sleep over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Elite players is what win titles, for the most part. Get as many elite guys as you can. Stars and scrubs is and always will be the best way to build a roster (although that name is misleading because scrubs really just means cheap player and cheap player doesn’t mean scrub..but it gets the point across).
    • So you believe Cowser has well below average power because that’s what 10-15 is?
    • I'd rather pass on Cease and keep Norby, Ortiz, Kjerstad and Cowser in the system.   I know you have to give up value to get value.  But the cost to acquire good starting pitching in terms of money and prospects has inflated so astronomically that I start to wonder if we might just be better off auditioning Povich, McDermott, Seth Johnson, Cole Irvin and seeing if anyone can stick...?     I'd probably be willing to part with Beavers, Wagner, Fabian, Stowers and I can see maybe trading one top guy (but not Mayo, Holliday or Basallo).
    • Let’s use the Orioles 2023 season as a general case study and compare with a study I learned about via well known journalist and author, Malcolm Gladwell, Revisionist History podcast. (Season 1,  Episode 6, “My Little Hundred Million”. )   https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/revisionist-history/id1119389968?i=1000372836942   At minute 12:15 or so, Gladwell discusses whether it is a greater help to a sports team if the worst player on the roster is replaced with a better player or if the team brings in an even better player as its top star.  That is, does it help more to strengthen your strongest link or your weakest link? His conclusion is: It depends on the sport. In basketball one player can dominate the court in offense and defense. So improve your top player. In soccer, a tital team sport improve the weakest player.   It set me thinking is baseball a strong link or weak link sport?   It seems that in constructing the 2023 roster, Elias, whether intentionally or not, used the improve the weakest links strategy.    Gibson replaced Lyles McCann replaced Benboom Frazier replaced Odor.  Additional improvements occurred with adjusting playing time levels of players in the organization for both 22 and 23.  The result was a stellar 101 win season!   The Orioles 2023 regular season experience suggests that baseball is a strengthen the weakest links sport.    But then the playoffs. The consensus seems to be we lacked the superstar who can carry the team.    It seems that baseball in the playoffs is more of a strong link sport.    So, to put it together, the 2023 Orioles season experience suggests that the regular season is improved with an improve the weak link strategy. While playoffs often need a superstar.    So, if this theory holds true, do the Orioles need to specifically add more proven All Star level players or do we simply depend upon the hope that one of these years we will have a good player get hot at just the right time?
    • Anyone considered for extention has insurance for that case.  Nothing like an extention for sure but I know the family of a top 5 pick who carried a $10m insurance policy in college prior to being drafted.  Any agent at that level should have his clients insured.
    • Looking at which numbers?
    • That's the whole point.  Other teams aren't going to give up more in players/prospects than the Yankees gave up AND pay Soto $33 million.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...