Jump to content

Nolasco


Ripken08

Recommended Posts

The Marlins get minor-league pitchers Steven Ames, Josh Wall and Angel Sanchez in the deal, which was announced Saturday night. The Dodgers will pay the remainder of Nolasco's $11.5 million salary, and will also get an international signing slot valued at $197,000 from the Marlins.

From: http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/danny-knobler/22663180/dodgers-getting-close-to-trade-for-ricky-nolasco

Angel Sanchez: http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=sanche008ang

Steven Ames: http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=ames--001ste

Josh Wall: http://www.baseball-reference.com/minors/player.cgi?id=wall--006jos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't look like they gave up much to get him.

26 year old 2nd round right hander with a minor league career 5+ ERA, 1.519 WHIP (Josh Wall), 25 year old right hander with a minor league career 2.22 ERA, 1.111 WHIP (Steven Ames), and 23 year old right hander in A+ ball with a minor league career 4.88 ERA and 1.410 WHIP (Angel Sanchez). Important to note that Wall has been a reliever in the minors the last few years and Ames has been a reliever his entire minor league career. Sanchez is the only starter who seems to have some upside.

Doesn't look like a lot. Not sure how Sanchez projects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't look like they gave up much to get him.

The Marlins aren't paying a dime of his salary so they pretty much get bullpen arms. The Dodgers get some international cap space but it remains if acquiring Nolasco is pointless for a team that may not contend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • I wonder how people would feel if Eflin’s ERA this season started with a 3 - like every single more predictive measure (3.37 xERA, 3.65 FIP, 3.77 xFIP, 3.92 SIERA) - instead of being a ghastly 4.09.  For those hoping for somebody better - who exactly do you think is better who is potentially available other than Skubal and Crochet? Fedde has been better this year, but last year he was in Korea and Eflin had a 4.7 fWAR season with a 3.50 ERA. I’d still take Eflin over him going forward, even if it’s close. More importantly, he’s also owed only $7.5M next year to Eflin’s $18M, so the trade price will be MUCH higher and every single team looking for pitching can afford him next year and is competing for him. Taking Eflin’s salary lowered the competition and the prospect capital and is EXACTLY the type of deal the Orioles should be doing with their payroll flexibility. Snell was horrible this year, then hurt, and now maybe himself again. Even if you think he’s good going forward now, he’s a rental with the anchor of a potential $31M salary next year if he gets injured or starts struggling again.  Bassitt is good, but by all predictive measures other than ERA still worse than Eflin this year, but he’s 35 and owed even more next year ($21M). And the reports are he’s not even available.  Taillon is fine, but not better than Eflin - everything in his profile is pointing to a 4+ ERA much more than Eflin. Rangers are not trading Eovaldi or Scherzer now. Luzardo maybe, but he’s hurt and MIA may not be trading him either.  Am I missing anybody? I’d love to add any of these guys too and don’t think the Orioles should stop here. But Eflin was arguably the best available, and definitely the best fit in terms of the balance of prospect capital vs. taking on salary. To boot they also added added to a rotation next year that right now only has Grayson and Kremer.  I can understand wanting a more impressive high K, ace SP type in theory, but with all of this context I don’t know how you could think anything other than loving this deal. 
    • Which indicates that this is currently not a good team.  Question marks everywhere. If your not playing and not happy about it, make the most of the chances when you get them.
    • i agree with what those who are saying the vets might be a little miffed with uncertain contract futures looming.  But the reality is the young guys are going to be auditioned adequately before summarily being brought up just to take their "rightful" places now filled by vets. I don't have any problem with how Elias is handling talent either in the farm or on the MLB team.  And after reflecting a while on a position I had about trading long-term O's during a Playoff/WS run - basically, that Elias would show some deference to guys that got us here - I've flopped on that.  What I think is happening is that the audition process is concluding in some ways.  Had Hays come out like an All-Star again this year, I still think he would have/ could have been traded, but for maybe a higher net.  Cowser and Kierstadt have, by now, proven themselves - so to speak, and having control of them, makes them more valuable, particularly since both were outperforming Hays.  I think Mullins could be next.  To me, it was basically a "prove it" year for anyone competing for OF positions.  My biggest question is do they amp up the "try outs" for 2nd and 3rd base now.
    • What I was saying yesterday is without Burnes, he moved into that spot at the top of the rotation for the team as currently constructed. I’m not saying next year he will be a CY candidate, although he has great stuff and has the potential to do so if he can put it all together. 
    • Actually it's clear to me that there is no reporting. No quotes or even "sources say".
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...