Jump to content

Orioles C Matt Wieters to visit Dr. James Andrews

Greg

By Greg
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

murph Hangout Grand Counsel

murph

Posted
Posted

Finally sat down to watch the game about an inning and a half ago and hear about the forearm tightness.

Quickly pull up the OH knowing this thread would be here.

Read the thread and feel totally deflated.

Not the evening I was looking forward to....

Even if Wieters is a DH only I'm not sure we will perform to playoff potential without him behind the plate. My hope is it is something other than a torn UCL. Pretty much all to hope for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 242
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted
It isn't Boras' decision!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Boras can't "let" let do anything.

The agents work for the player the player does not work for the agent.

Why in the world do folks think Boras has this unnatural grip on his players?

On a decision like that, Boras will use every ounce of influence he has to convince Wieters that waiting until after the season would be insanely against Wieters' self/interest -- and he'd be right.

Or, we can extend Wieters now and then tell him to postpone the surgery...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Buck didn't say much about Wieters on MASN, just that he hoped he's catching tmrw night.</p>— Brittany Ghiroli (@Britt_Ghiroli) <a href="

">May 7, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Wieters had MRI yesterday. Will be back for game tomorrow. Quick flight to Pensacola</p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">May 7, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • deward
      Who Should Be Extension Priority #1?

      By deward · Posted

      If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • webbrick2010
      My annual head first slide thread

      By webbrick2010 · Posted

      Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • DrungoHazewood
      Time Gunnar's triple

      By DrungoHazewood · Posted

      Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • interloper
      The A's Series

      By interloper · Posted

      I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • DrungoHazewood
      Colton Cowser 2024

      By DrungoHazewood · Posted

      Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • interloper
      Time Gunnar's triple

      By interloper · Posted

      Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • Frobby
      4/25: Bowie Wins, Only Team Above .500

      By Frobby · Posted

      How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...