Jump to content

Would you have matched SEA offer to keep Cruz an Oriole?


isestrex

Would you have matched 4y/$57M for Cruz?  

160 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you have matched 4y/$57M for Cruz?

    • Yes, that's reasonable
      42
    • No, let the Mariners have him.
      118

This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

From age zero through 32 Cruz was worth 12 wins, which is the 523rd best mark of all time among 1B/RF/LF/DHs.  Just below Dmitri Young, Hal Morris and Dan Gladden.  Quite a few slots behind such luminaries as Aubrey Huff and Chris Davis.

From age 35-38 Cruz was worth 16 wins, which is 10th all time at those positions.  A few spots behind Roberto Clemente and just in front of Stan Musial and Paul Molitor.

I guess if you saw that coming, good on you.

I mentioned yesterday the study I’d done of active players through age 36.    The average player in that group acquired 51% of their total WAR by age 29; the median was 53.5%.    Cruz was the lowest in the group, at 25%.    And that didn’t even include the 7.2 WAR he put up in his age 37-38 seasons.    He’s about as extreme an outlier as you’ll ever find.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On 12/1/2014 at 12:19 PM, isestrex said:

If given the chance, would you have paid 4y/$57M for Cruz if he came back and asked the Orioles to match?

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2020/07/nelson-cruz-discusses-future-plans.html

Quote

“I don’t see it [soon],” Cruz said of calling it quits sometime soon, and he went on to state that “my body is in good shape, and I’m doing everything I can to keep it that way. Why would I retire?”

Indeed, based on the eye-popping offensive numbers he has put up over the past few seasons, Cruz doesn’t look like someone who’s anywhere near the finish line. Cruz was a force with the Mariners from 2015-18 over 2,558-plate appearance tenure in which he slashed .284/.362/.546 (147 wRC+) with 163 home runs, and he only got better a year ago.

Owing to his age and his inability to factor in as a defender, Cruz didn’t secure a multiyear guarantee in free agency after his time in Seattle ended. He instead inked a one-year, $14.3MM deal with the Twins, though that contract did come with a $12MM club option for 2020. The Twins exercised it this past offseason, which was a no-brainer in light of the production Cruz posted in Year 1 in Minnesota.

...

While Cruz only played in 120 games, his fewest since 2013, he still managed to amass 41 home runs across 521 PA and slash .311/.392/.639 – good for a personal-high wRC+ of 163. His HR total played a major role in the Twins setting a single-season record with 307.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/1/2014 at 3:49 PM, Ruzious said:

I would go with Seattle over you on this one. If he stays healthy, he'll be worth the money. And winning is better than losing.

You guys don't know what it's like to be right all the time.  You're so lucky to not have that burden.  

  • Upvote 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ruzious said:

You guys don't know what it's like to be right all the time.  You're so lucky to not have that burden.  

I feel like I am now ready to weigh in here...

"Would you have matched 4y/$57M for Cruz?"

Yes

And why can't Dan Duquette see this very obvious, compelling evidence that it's a smart idea!?!?!?!?!

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that today is Nelson’s birthday, and a little blurb listed all of his accomplishments. I’m wondering if he is in that no man’s land of Hall of Fame voting, where he gets votes for a while and then drops off?

Or does he perhaps have a real shot at induction?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Philip said:

It seems that today is Nelson’s birthday, and a little blurb listed all of his accomplishments. I’m wondering if he is in that no man’s land of Hall of Fame voting, where he gets votes for a while and then drops off?

Or does he perhaps have a real shot at induction?

Anything’s possible and WAR isn’t everything but he has less WAR than Baines, who was roundly considered an awful pick. No way Cruz gets voted in—maybe he’ll be best buddies with someone on whatever committee in 25 years. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, makoman said:

Anything’s possible and WAR isn’t everything but he has less WAR than Baines, who was roundly considered an awful pick. No way Cruz gets voted in—maybe he’ll be best buddies with someone on whatever committee in 25 years. 

He's a known steroid user.  The ones that are actually HoF worthy need to be put in before he has a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He's a known steroid user.  The ones that are actually HoF worthy need to be put in before he has a chance.

The HoF x-factor is that writers seem to love him.   In her recap of her years as a beat writer with the O's, Britt Ghiroli says he is flat out the nicest player she ever dealt with and a was a joy to work with.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SteveA said:

The HoF x-factor is that writers seem to love him.   In her recap of her years as a beat writer with the O's, Britt Ghiroli says he is flat out the nicest player she ever dealt with and a was a joy to work with.

I'd like to see a voter defend voting for Cruz when they didn't vote for Bonds or Clemens.

Does Britt have a HoF vote?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...